OH, I didn't know you were a lawyerand NOT "if" you are using "Fighting Words" ...
fighting words n.
words intentionally directed toward another person which are so nasty and full of malice as to cause the hearer to suffer emotional distress or incite him/her to immediately retaliate physically (hit, stab, shoot, etc.)
While such words are not an excuse or defense for a retaliatory assault and battery, if they are threatening they can form the basis for a lawsuit for assault.
Words which would likely make the person whom they are addressed commit an act of violence. Fighting words are a category of speech that is *unprotected* by the First Amendment. Chaplinsky v New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568 (1942).
Inflammatory words that are either injurious by themselves or might cause the hearer to immediately retaliate or breach the peace. Use of such words is not necessarily protected "free speech" under the First Amendment. If the hearer is prosecuted for assault, claiming fighting words may establish mitigating circumstances.
"you" the libTARDS use of "obscenity AND BS" you USE on here DAILY are
protected by the US Constitution ...
RIGHT & WRONG!
Obscenity IS NOT Protected Speech - Concerned Women for America
obscenity. Find out how you can make a difference in combating obscenity. Obscenity *IS NOT* Protected Speech
How many HERE have VIOLATED those rules ...???
Well, counselor, did I appeal predominantly to "prurient" interest?????...;)