'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 253484 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

Fox News Propaganda Lies

Garden City, NY

#78181 Jan 30, 2013
SCOTUS wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU are TOTALLY NUTS!
Not true and even if it were NOT RELAVANT!
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/10...
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me.

Excerpt from "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam" by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time (2 March 1998):
While we hoped that popular revolt or coup would topple Saddam, neither the U.S. nor the countries of the region wished to see the breakup of the Iraqi state. We were concerned about the long-term balance of power at the head of the Gulf. Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep," and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-cold war world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome.
whitehair

Fort Thomas, KY

#78182 Jan 30, 2013
mixer wrote:
<quoted text>
I wish someone would listen to you and the milions who think the same way but they wont so wat do we do about this mess. I be writing to my congresses and senators and they say they agree but aint nobody doin nuthin. They send back letter says thank you for writin me dats it!!!!
Thank you.I do the same,and the return letter usually has little content,and very little do.Just another letter to sooth a constituent.
Fox News Propaganda Lies

Garden City, NY

#78183 Jan 30, 2013
SCOTUS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why discuss it?
Chief Justice Roberts will here legal arguments soon!
The we will have something to discuss, when sealed documents have been exposed to daylight!
The Supreme Court needs at least 3 members to take a case.

The Clueless idiot Thomas was the only one who wanted to take the case if Obama was a US citizen.

“I hit'em like Deer in the road”

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#78184 Jan 30, 2013
Fox News Propaganda Lies wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me.
Excerpt from "Why We Didn't Remove Saddam" by George Bush [Sr.] and Brent Scowcroft, Time (2 March 1998):
While we hoped that popular revolt or coup would topple Saddam, neither the U.S. nor the countries of the region wished to see the breakup of the Iraqi state. We were concerned about the long-term balance of power at the head of the Gulf. Trying to eliminate Saddam, extending the ground war into an occupation of Iraq, would have violated our guideline about not changing objectives in midstream, engaging in "mission creep," and would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible. We had been unable to find Noriega in Panama, which we knew intimately. We would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. The coalition would instantly have collapsed, the Arabs deserting it in anger and other allies pulling out as well. Under those circumstances, furthermore, we had been self-consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post-cold war world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the U.N.'s mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the U.S. could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land. It would have been a dramatically different--and perhaps barren--outcome.
Saddam is DEAD! You are wrong, little cut/paste-tard!
whitehair

Fort Thomas, KY

#78185 Jan 30, 2013
Chicago has another bunch shot.In a city where gun control is "the thing".Now the average citizen has no gun for his/her own protection,but the criminals have them all,and care not for the gun laws,that is one reason they are called criminals!
OBAMIES ZOMBIES

United States

#78187 Jan 30, 2013
whitehair wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you.I do the same,and the return letter usually has little content,and very little do.Just another letter to sooth a constituent.
Same here ...
Fox News Propaganda Lies

Garden City, NY

#78188 Jan 30, 2013
FordGalaxyTraveler wrote:
<quoted text>
Saddam is DEAD! You are wrong, little cut/paste-tard!
Dumbya Bush freed the Shites in Iraq who are loyal to Iran.

Wake Up And Smell The Coffee.

======

You seem to be a Frank Luntz believer.

Svengali Luntz changed the wording from Estate Tax to Death Tax so people like yourself will endorse it.

It only applies to Millionaires and Billionaires.

Since: Dec 11

.

#78189 Jan 30, 2013
AmericanMan wrote:
<quoted text>When we get back to losing 750,000 jobs per month and the stock market loses 60% of its value in two days and we go off into a desert looking for WMDs that were never there,,.,,do get back with us on the destroying our country. Fool.
Challenge for you!

Take the Politix Quiz http://politix.topix.com/homepage/4001-what-d...

and tell me how you scored "HONESTLY" I'm pretty sure a Conservative Libertarian knows more about "Liberalism" than a Liberal does!
Jay

Springville, TN

#78199 Jan 30, 2013
You know why he won't disarm his guards? Because his life is more valuable to him than yours is to you.
Because his life is more valuable to his wife, his kids and grandkids than yours is to your wife, kids and grandkids.

In other words, he's loaded with money, he's is an elitist, and you are a peon that pays for his protection.

Bah!!!
**********

Mayor Bloomberg Won’t Disarm Guards
January 30, 2013

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Plain-clothes NYPD officers (armed, one assumes) assigned to NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg briefly used journalist Jason Mattera as a human ping pong ball on a Washington, DC street

He’d dared ask would Bloomberg disarm his security detail in the spirit of gun control. In effect, he questioned whether the mayor would live as he wants average New Yorkers to live: defenseless.

It’s a fair question. I support good cops and private officers, but I also know that only politicians and the wealthy can afford them as personnel protection.

Joe and Jane America, especially in what I call this “non-economy”, can’t afford bodyguards. I have a saying for this safety disparity:

“Rich people get bodyguards; poor people get shot.”

http://www.westernjournalism.com/mayor-bloomb...
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78200 Jan 30, 2013
Fox News Propaganda Lies wrote:
<quoted text>
Their Levees - Our Levees
http://tinyurl.com/9sjde
Here's how the British hold back the waters from flooding London:
And the Dutch solution to protecting an entire nation that mostly rests below sea level:
The Italians are defending their city on the sea, Venice:
And...
Here's how the richest, most powerful and technologically advanced
nation on earth protected against the long-forecasted flooding of New Orleans:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0112-...
=========
Minimum Wage 101:
Germany $12.74 England $9.20 Italy $9.18 France $8.88 Australia $8.66 United States 5.15
Last time I checked, the federal minimum wage in the US was $7.25.
Germany -$12.75 X 40=$510.00 - 72%=$143.00
U.S.A.-$7.25 X 40=$290.00 -.06%=$272.60 (sales tax depends on your state)

Now how would you like to live in Germany at $12.75 per hour!
you dont say

United States

#78201 Jan 30, 2013
Fox News Propaganda Lies wrote:
<quoted text>
Dumbya Bush freed the Shites in Iraq who are loyal to Iran.
Wake Up And Smell The Coffee.
======
You seem to be a Frank Luntz believer.
Svengali Luntz changed the wording from Estate Tax to Death Tax so people like yourself will endorse it.
It only applies to Millionaires and Billionaires.
Maybe not Bush, maybe not FOX, but BSNBC and Global Warming is responsible for everything ...

Wake up and smell the coffee!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78203 Jan 30, 2013
Fox News Propaganda Lies wrote:
<quoted text>
Ronald Reagan used our US Constitution for toilet paper.
=======
The Iran-Contra Affair 20 Years On
Documents Spotlight Role of Reagan, Top Aides
Pentagon Nominee Robert Gates Among Many
Prominent Figures Involved in the Scandal
http://tinyurl.com/y9rduo
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB210...
Oliver North Questioned - Rex 84 Exposed During Iran Contra
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Ug0IL7k3elQXX
LMAO!!! Hell, I was almost dragged into that mess, at least the guns weren't given to the Mexican drug lords.(Fast and Furious)

Since: Dec 11

.

#78207 Jan 30, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Last time I checked, the federal minimum wage in the US was $7.25.
Germany -$12.75 X 40=$510.00 - 72%=$143.00
U.S.A.-$7.25 X 40=$290.00 -.06%=$272.60 (sales tax depends on your state)
Now how would you like to live in Germany at $12.75 per hour!
There is no bottom to the barrel of stupid!

No matter how deep you reach, you can't touch reality for them!

Take history for example ask them what the "Six Day War" was.
Obama is setting up WWIII with F-16's and 200 tanks!

http://www.policymic.com/articles/19151/israe...
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#78208 Jan 30, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no bottom to the barrel of stupid!
No matter how deep you reach, you can't touch reality for them!
Take history for example ask them what the "Six Day War" was.
Obama is setting up WWIII with F-16's and 200 tanks!
http://www.policymic.com/articles/19151/israe...
You are so frigging ignorant it is not funny. We have the largest Military in the World several times over.

Pull your head out of your rear.
what is your problem

United States

#78209 Jan 30, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>That is what caused you to be so stupid?
...Obama blames bad economy on everything under the Sun, but his policies ...
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#78210 Jan 30, 2013
what is your problem wrote:
<quoted text>
...Obama blames bad economy on everything under the Sun, but his policies ...
That was agreat Economy Bush handed him in 2009????

You stupid pos.
duh

United States

#78211 Jan 30, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>That was agreat Economy Bush handed him in 2009????
You stupid pos.
Obama must be really "good" president for the last 4 yrs...geez.....economy is really "improving".
You stupid pos.
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78213 Jan 30, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no bottom to the barrel of stupid!
No matter how deep you reach, you can't touch reality for them!
Take history for example ask them what the "Six Day War" was.
Obama is setting up WWIII with F-16's and 200 tanks!
http://www.policymic.com/articles/19151/israe...
Liberals will swallow anything, if it has "for the children" preceding it.
I think the armor on those tanks is classified, that by itself should be grounds for stopping the transfer.
Hopefully the F-16's doesn't have the state of the arts electronics on board, but knowing Obama they probably do. Hell, he will probably send training advisers or bring the pilots here for training.
What a great guy he is!!!
wtf

Elkhorn City, KY

#78214 Jan 30, 2013
duh wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama must be really "good" president for the last 4 yrs...geez.....economy is really "improving".
You stupid pos.
January 20, 2009 DOW at 6,000

January 20, 2013 DOW at 13,500

You stupid pos.

lmao
lmao
lmao
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#78215 Jan 30, 2013
wtf wrote:
<quoted text>You are so frigging ignorant it is not funny. We have the largest Military in the World several times over.
Pull your head out of your rear.
LMAO!! What rock have you been sleeping under??

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who will be the next Knox Co. Judge Exec.? 24 min my opinion 172
Just curious Old Datsun 280Z 29 min Santa 4
Johny bays is in jail, someone should rob his h... 39 min Jack 1
How is Godfathers Pizza at Shell ? 2 hr Pope 10
Recounts what happens next a civil upheaval? 2 hr Quantummist 20
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 2 hr Moe Larry Curly 156,579
Chris McQueen 2 hr friend 7

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages