'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Full Story
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77832 Jan 28, 2013
dems are retards wrote:
<quoted text>
or you can have a constitutional republic in this country where people can choose to be rich, poor or middle class, we are not a democracy libboy, thus, the Democratic National Convention is to America what the Nazis were to 1930s Germany,
You already lost your rights with Dumbya Bush and now with Obama.

WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE!

Hitler Oath
http://www.nobeliefs.com/images/HitlerOath.mp...

Restrictions on personal liberty, on the right of free expression of opinion, including freedom of the press; on the rights of assembly and associations; and violations of the privacy of postal, telegraphic, and telephonic communications and warrants for house searches, orders for confiscations as well as restrictions of property, are also permissible beyond the legal limits otherwise prescribed.,

The tone is familiar. Is it Clinton’s Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996?

Is it the Bush Patriot Act of 2001?

No. It is from Hitler’s 1933 speech calling for an Enabling Act for the protection of the People and the State after the catastrophic Reichstag fire that the Nazis had secretly lit.

---------

Bush challenges hundreds of laws / President cites powers of his office
http://tinyurl.com/ogv5u / April 30, 2006
WASHINGTON -- President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.

Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems,''whistle-blower " protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research.
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/20...
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77834 Jan 28, 2013
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan Presidency Democrat Majority Congress & Senate
G. Dubbya Bush 9/11 and war + he spent like a Liberal!
(Pelosi had the gavel two years of
G.W.'S LAST TERM!)
Obamas motivations?
For the most part Ari, Both parties are one and the same!

SMARTEN UP!

========

Why We Fight
http://tinyurl.com/bn73v
http://www.sonyclassics.com/whywefight/main.h...

We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. Today the real test of power is not capacity to make war but capacity to prevent it. The guns and the bombs, the rockets and the warships, are all symbols of human failure. History teaches that war begins when governments believe the price of aggression is cheap.
Dwight D. Eisenhower

==========

Republican Presidents Dereliction of Duty
Ronald Reagan, who did not retaliate for the murder of 278 United States Marines in Beirut and who violated his own terrorism policy by trading arms for hostages in what came to be called the Iran-Contra scandal; http://tinyurl.com/9s52o

George H.W. Bush, who did not retaliate for the Libyan murder of 259 passengers on Pan Am 103; who did not have an official counter terrorism policy; who left Saddam Hussein in place, requiring the United States to leave a large military presence in Saudi Arabia.

George W. Bush who did not alert the airports having known the CIA warning memo August 6, 2001: Usama bin Laden and al Qaeda determined to strike inside the United States. FBI warned John Ashcroft July 26, 2001 not to fly on commercial airlines.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/07/26/nat...
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77837 Jan 28, 2013
Reality wrote:
Abortion in America
Abortion is worst than the Holocaust.
Obama said he is a Christian, although, he voted to not ban partial birth abortion.
Obama said when he was running the first time for president and was asked by Rick Warren what was his view on abortion.
Obama said: "this is above his pay grade." Hmmmmm.
5 weeks==heart beat can be detected
8 weeks==brain waves and fingerprints are detected.
10 weeks=can swallow, move, etc.
12 weeks=baby can feel, suck his/her thumb.
Yet pro-abortion say this is not a life.
90% of women who are told they can have an ultrasound prior to abortion, decided not to have the abortion.
FOR EVIL TO TRIUMPH IS FOR GOOD MEN TO DO NOTHING.
Abortion proves this fact.
Dumbya Bush had a Republican Congress until 2006 and did not overturn Roe vs Wade.

Then Dumbya Bush picked two rightwing Justices Alito and Roberts who have the votes to overturn Roe vs Wade and DID NOT DO IT.

So what do YOU glean from these truthful facts?

BTW: The Republican Congress was from 1994-2006.
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77840 Jan 28, 2013
Hell on Hee1s wrote:
<quoted text>
War Time president!
George Bush was and had to declare it.
Because of 9/11
Google it.
War Powers of President
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials...
Glenn
1, September 11, 2011 at 9:11 am
“a feeling only magnified later when Obama was shown gloating over how he personally advised the terrorists on the best place to hit the buildings.”
Would you like to clarify this?
http://jonathanturley.org/2011/09/11/reflecti...
Terrorism is a tactic and not a war.

Bush and now Obama cannot have dictoral power for Perpetual Wars.

==========

Of course, the ominous signs in 2001 were realized in a myriad of other ways, from the establishment of the first American torture program to the widespread use of targeted assassinations, including operations killing American citizens. Ironically, I wrote then of the possibility of a new law that could govern the use of assassination, one that would deny a president unilateral authority to kill individuals and would reduce the need to invoke war powers. Instead, the Bush administration claimed full wartime authority as well as radically expanding the use of assassination as an unchecked presidential power. The claim of unilateral presidential authority to kill even United States citizens has been embraced by Obama.

What ultimately fell on that terrible day proved to be some of our most important constitutional structures. Tragically, it is a degree of damage that cannot be claimed by Al Qaeda alone.
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77842 Jan 28, 2013
Hell on Hee1s wrote:
Tru
1, September 11, 2011 at 11:20 am
You have a typo in there in which you say “Obama” instead of “Osama.” Please fix. Thanks.
jonathanturley
1, September 11, 2011 at 11:28 am
Thanks. Sorry for typo. I am driving back to dc after a wedding in Chicago with the kids and dog. I did not catch the typo this morning.
=)
Don't drive and text.

It is dangerous.
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77844 Jan 28, 2013
Hell on Hee1s wrote:
<quoted text>
War Time president!
George Bush was and had to declare it.
Because of 9/11
Google it.
War Powers of President
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials...
Glenn
1, September 11, 2011 at 9:11 am
“a feeling only magnified later when Obama was shown gloating over how he personally advised the terrorists on the best place to hit the buildings.”
Would you like to clarify this?
http://jonathanturley.org/2011/09/11/reflecti...
1948 Smith-Mundt Act The 1948 Smith-Mundt Act prohibited the domestic dissemination of United States government propaganda. The reasoning behind Smith-Mundt was that Congress wanted to be certain that a United States government agency could not brainwash our own citizens as Hitler had done in Germany.

=======

Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand
April 20, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/3u6rty
In the summer of 2005, the Bush administration confronted a fresh wave of criticism over Guantánamo Bay. The detention center had just been branded “the gulag of our times” by Amnesty International, there were new allegations of abuse from United Nations human rights experts and calls were mounting for its closure.
Records and interviews show how the Bush administration has used its control over access and information in an effort to transform the analysts into a kind of media Trojan horse — an instrument intended to shape terrorism coverage from inside the major TV and radio networks.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/20/washington/...

=======

Pentagon’s Pundits: A Look at the Defense Department’s Propaganda Program / April 22, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/64ln28
The New York Times has revealed new details on how the Pentagon recruited more than 75 retired military officers to appear on TV outlets as so-called military analysts ahead of the Iraq war to portray Iraq as an urgent threat. The Times reported the Pentagon continues to use the analysts in a propaganda campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance. We speak with Col. Sam Gardiner (Ret.) and Peter Hart, of Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting.
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/4/22/pentago...
Pdamerica org

Bay Shore, NY

#77845 Jan 28, 2013
2003 torture memo released by Pentagon
Justice Department document said Bush could ignore torture bans
April. 1, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/3azdkv
WASHINGTON - The Pentagon on Tuesday released a now-defunct legal memo that approved the use of harsh interrogation techniques against terrorism suspects, saying that President Bush's authority during wartime trumps any international ban on torture.
The Justice Department memo, dated March 14, 2003, outlines legal justification for military interrogators to use harsh tactics against al-Qaida and Taliban detainees overseas — so long as they did not specifically intend to torture their captors.
Even so, the memo noted, the president's wartime power as commander in chief would not be limited by the U.N. treaties against torture.
LOL

Nicholasville, KY

#77847 Jan 28, 2013
Let this thread die, not relevant anymore!
WTF

Ashland, KY

#77851 Jan 28, 2013
Reality wrote:
Liberals:
Can put together a Gun Ban Bill in days.
Can't put together and pass a Budget and Debt Bill in 4 years.
That gun ban bill has been in the works for at least for 4 years, and was going to happen no matter what.This was the most opportunity time to strike .America is headed toward a holocaust of our own. Femma Camps and coffins already waiting.
When we start seeing our families go hungry because we have no jobs, no homes and no way to fight back there will a civil war where we will be massacred in the streets. The government knows this and is getting prepared for a fight and they will have the weapons to do it. We will have sticks and rocks.
WTF

Ashland, KY

#77852 Jan 28, 2013
LOL wrote:
Let this thread die, not relevant anymore!
You speak for your self, now move on if you don't like it.Why should we do what you want because you say so.

“HeavensofFireEar th is catching”

Since: Jan 13

Perdition, Tx

#77854 Jan 28, 2013
WTF wrote:
<quoted text>
That gun ban bill has been in the works for at least for 4 years, and was going to happen no matter what.This was the most opportunity time to strike .America is headed toward a holocaust of our own. Femma Camps and coffins already waiting.
When we start seeing our families go hungry because we have no jobs, no homes and no way to fight back there will a civil war where we will be massacred in the streets. The government knows this and is getting prepared for a fight and they will have the weapons to do it. We will have sticks and rocks.
City Streets will be apocalyptic ruins!
Rat traps nailed to central park trees will be like grocery stores, 1st come, 1st served! How do you like your rat? BBQ or roasted over oily skid?
Nerd Rage

Chambersburg, PA

#77855 Jan 28, 2013
WTF wrote:
<quoted text>
That gun ban bill has been in the works for at least for 4 years, and was going to happen no matter what.This was the most opportunity time to strike .America is headed toward a holocaust of our own. Femma Camps and coffins already waiting.
When we start seeing our families go hungry because we have no jobs, no homes and no way to fight back there will a civil war where we will be massacred in the streets. The government knows this and is getting prepared for a fight and they will have the weapons to do it. We will have sticks and rocks.
What gun ban bill? Just because there's a bill doesn't mean that it will ever get passed also to believe that the govt. will ban all guns is just not plausable. They may try to ban "Assult rifles" for no good reason but that's a long shot. Where are you getting your news?
Democracynow org

Bay Shore, NY

#77857 Jan 28, 2013
dems are retards wrote:
<quoted text>
you are not allowed on this forum, libs are not allowed, they have no intellect, they say stupid things and act like they know something, you think like a dictator just like your oblamer, Bush cannot go around the Supreme Court - who ruled on RvW, but your traitor in chief does, thats why you think like that and thats why you need to go to another fourm that has much less intellect, you are out of your league here libboy,
BAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me.

==========

A Spy Speaks Out
Former Top CIA Official Tyler Drumheller On "Faulty" Intelligence Claims /
http://tinyurl.com/rle4x / April 23, 2006

"The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy."

Tyler Drumheller CIA Ret.

(CBS) When no weapons of mass destruction surfaced in Iraq, President Bush insisted that all those WMD claims before the war were the result of faulty intelligence. But a former top CIA official, Tyler Drumheller — a 26-year veteran of the agency — has decided to do something CIA officials at his level almost never do: Speak out.

He tells correspondent Ed Bradley the real failure was not in the intelligence community but in the White House. He says he saw how the Bush administration, time and again, welcomed intelligence that fit the president's determination to go to war and turned a blind eye to intelligence that did not.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/21/60m...

Ex-CIA Official Paul Pillar Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
February 10, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/azl6w

The former CIA official who coordinated U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until last year has accused the Bush administration of "cherry-picking" intelligence on Iraq to justify a decision it had already reached to go to war, and of ignoring warnings that the country could easily fall into violence and chaos after an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein.

Paul R Pillar's critique is one of the most severe indictments of White House actions by a former Bush official since Richard C. Clarke, a former National Security Council staff member, went public with his criticism of the administration's handling of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and its failure to deal with the terrorist threat beforehand.

It is also the first time that such a senior intelligence officer has so directly and publicly condemned the administration's handling of intelligence.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Nerd Rage

Chambersburg, PA

#77859 Jan 28, 2013
Democracynow org wrote:
<quoted text>
Everything I post is factual and nobody can disprove me.
==========
A Spy Speaks Out
Former Top CIA Official Tyler Drumheller On "Faulty" Intelligence Claims /
http://tinyurl.com/rle4x / April 23, 2006
"The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy."
Tyler Drumheller CIA Ret.
(CBS) When no weapons of mass destruction surfaced in Iraq, President Bush insisted that all those WMD claims before the war were the result of faulty intelligence. But a former top CIA official, Tyler Drumheller — a 26-year veteran of the agency — has decided to do something CIA officials at his level almost never do: Speak out.
He tells correspondent Ed Bradley the real failure was not in the intelligence community but in the White House. He says he saw how the Bush administration, time and again, welcomed intelligence that fit the president's determination to go to war and turned a blind eye to intelligence that did not.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/04/21/60m...
Ex-CIA Official Paul Pillar Faults Use of Data on Iraq
Intelligence 'Misused' to Justify War, He Says
February 10, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/azl6w
The former CIA official who coordinated U.S. intelligence on the Middle East until last year has accused the Bush administration of "cherry-picking" intelligence on Iraq to justify a decision it had already reached to go to war, and of ignoring warnings that the country could easily fall into violence and chaos after an invasion to overthrow Saddam Hussein.
Paul R Pillar's critique is one of the most severe indictments of White House actions by a former Bush official since Richard C. Clarke, a former National Security Council staff member, went public with his criticism of the administration's handling of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks and its failure to deal with the terrorist threat beforehand.
It is also the first time that such a senior intelligence officer has so directly and publicly condemned the administration's handling of intelligence.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
You post that, and yet you don't mentions one singel word about Benghazi? Hypocrite!

Since: Dec 11

.

#77860 Jan 28, 2013
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
You post that, and yet you don't mentions one singel word about Benghazi? Hypocrite!
The Bayshore poster is not without "BIAS"...and not quite fully convinced by the Dimocrat crap-a-palooza.
TWA

London, KY

#77861 Jan 28, 2013
wonder what obozo is gonna screw up today, i know hes gonna screw something up hes screwed something up every day so far
Drivin n textin

United States

#77862 Jan 28, 2013
mixer wrote:
Drivin n textin on topics = dum and no life get a hobby foo besides eatin n gossipin
So what is your hobby...?????
Hypocrite Hillary

United States

#77863 Jan 28, 2013
Nerd Rage wrote:
<quoted text>
You post that, and yet you don't mentions one singel word about Benghazi? Hypocrite!
"WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT DOES IT MAKE"?
yes grandma

United States

#77864 Jan 28, 2013
mixer wrote:
Hell on heels sound like a scary fat chick but probly looks like a dude
Tell us more...
your mama

United States

#77865 Jan 28, 2013
mixer wrote:
Hell on heels sound like a scary fat chick but probly looks like a dude
...now please describe yourself ...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
KY What's mitch McConnell done for coal, when ther... 15 min Truther 4,558
Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 25 min phil greer 131,004
Tru-Seal re union (Feb '14) 46 min voter one 11
whos the best tell at Jackson msc 50 min bmx 1
Barbourville high school salaries WOW 53 min Gray 8
Rick Ayers 55 min bmx 4
JM Hall's Office Found In Violation of Open Rec... 1 hr Referee 12
Republicans have tunnel vision!! 21 hr Limbertwig 70
•••
•••
•••

Barbourville Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Barbourville People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Barbourville News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Barbourville
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••