'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Se...

'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

There are 287849 comments on the thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com story from Oct 1, 2010, titled 'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate. In it, thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com reports that:

"Fox News Sunday" is heading to Louisville, Ky. Jack Conway, Kentucky's attorney general and the Democratic candidate for Senate , and Rand Paul, the Republican nominee and son of Representative Ron Paul, Republican of Texas, have agreed to a live debate on "Fox News Sunday" on Oct.3 at 9 a.m. (Eastern time).

Join the discussion below, or Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com.

American Lady

Danville, KY

#66870 Dec 2, 2012
1
Joined
Sunday Nov 18

A "back UP"
I C U

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#66871 Dec 2, 2012
Republicans have no problem whatsoever spending all sorts of money on creating new soldiers and sending them to unfunded and unnecessary wars, but then won't take care of our veterans once they come home. At that point they've become too expensive.

Sadistic.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#66872 Dec 2, 2012
American Lady wrote:
1
Joined
Sunday Nov 18
A "back UP"
I C U
Gold star 4 U!
The Liberty Wall

Stockholm, Sweden

#66873 Dec 2, 2012
&fe ature=youtu.be

Watch this, makes fun of Obama =D
American Lady

Danville, KY

#66874 Dec 2, 2012
MindYourOwnB wrote:
<quoted text>
Gold star 4 U!
I'm alright
KYMI

Okemos, MI

#66875 Dec 2, 2012
MindYourOwnB wrote:
Republicans have no problem whatsoever spending all sorts of money on creating new soldiers and sending them to unfunded and unnecessary wars, but then won't take care of our veterans once they come home. At that point they've become too expensive.
Sadistic.
You can always tell a lib post, it always accuses someone else of what they are guilty of, sending troops into combat and then withholding funding from them, traitors!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#66876 Dec 2, 2012
Why President Obama was Reelected

It’s a safe assumption to make that the reelection of Barack Hussein Obama to the office of the United States Presidency will be talked about for decades to come. In history textbooks, 2012 will be referred as a momentous election year when the nation came together and collectively decided to stick with a president through the thick. Like Franklin Roosevelt, Abraham Lincoln, and other “transformative” presidents before him, Obama will be praised for keeping the country together in the midst of economic difficulty. In sum, he will be called a popular figure who triumphed over America’s old guard and lead the nation into a new era of solidarity and renewed social tolerance.

The lavishing has already begun with prominent voices on the left like Paul Krugman declaring the “new America” has made Obama their champion. It’s being said in major newspapers across the world that this new incarnation of the American experiment is much more attuned to the struggle of minorities and the downtrodden. They went with a President who will use the divine power of the federal government to lift the disenfranchised onto the platform of dignified living.

http://mises.ca/posts/blog/why-president-obam...
liar liar

Mason, OH

#66878 Dec 3, 2012
Hey wrote:
Should Obama be Impeached??? LMAO GOOD ONE...
Put him right there with Bill Clinton,HUH...
Since Al Gore's December 13 concession speech, Texas Governor George W. Bush has been given the title president-elect. This is the term traditionally accorded to the individual who is elected by the voters.
In this case, however, the designation is entirely inappropriate. The Republican candidate did not gain the presidency as a result of a popular mandate. Not only did Bush lose the popular vote nationally, he would have lost the popular vote in Florida had not five US Supreme Court justices intervened to overturn an order of the Florida high court and stop the counting of votes in that pivotal state.
Bush was not elected president, he was selected by judicial fiat. He should, by rights, be called the president-select

Since: Dec 11

.

#66879 Dec 3, 2012
LIAR, LIAR, Pants on Fire!

http://video.foxnews.com/v/2003917864001/
liar liar

Mason, OH

#66880 Dec 3, 2012
KYMI wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh well, I don't take these libs serious anyway, I just have fun outsmarting them with logic, its like shooting a bb into a hornets nest, they all fly around buzzing and making noise looking for something to sting and end up stinging themselves, then blame it on Bush, exactly like the economy!
LOLOL,
Since Al Gore's December 13 concession speech, Texas Governor George W. Bush has been given the title president-elect. This is the term traditionally accorded to the individual who is elected by the voters.
In this case, however, the designation is entirely inappropriate. The Republican candidate did not gain the presidency as a result of a popular mandate. Not only did Bush lose the popular vote nationally, he would have lost the popular vote in Florida had not five US Supreme Court justices intervened to overturn an order of the Florida high court and stop the counting of votes in that pivotal state.
Bush was not elected president, he was selected by judicial fiat. He should, by rights, be called the president-select
thirdwurldasmeri ka

Crossett, AR

#66882 Dec 3, 2012
the leftwingwhackadoos sent evewry liberal rag they call em newspapers to florida in n200 to recount chads they couldnt fihne enuff to elect albert arnold gore jr, and they have been lying since , sad isnt it

Since: Dec 11

.

#66883 Dec 3, 2012
thirdwurldasmerika wrote:
the leftwingwhackadoos sent evewry liberal rag they call em newspapers to florida in n200 to recount chads they couldnt fihne enuff to elect albert arnold gore jr, and they have been lying since , sad isnt it
Actually...that was their "Test Model" for "Obama-Fraud". They targeted Democratic strongholds and used as much as 110% voter registration (as opposed to actual registered voters). Since when has candidate i America won more than 100% of "registered voters" and no questions are asked of part leaders?

well

Mason, OH

#66884 Dec 3, 2012
thirdwurldasmerika wrote:
the leftwingwhackadoos sent evewry liberal rag they call em newspapers to florida in n200 to recount chads they couldnt fihne enuff to elect albert arnold gore jr, and they have been lying since , sad isnt it
Do you not remember the 2000 election. I guess not. Just learn your history and the facts and you will make since.
well

Mason, OH

#66885 Dec 3, 2012
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually...that was their "Test Model" for "Obama-Fraud". They targeted Democratic strongholds and used as much as 110% voter registration (as opposed to actual registered voters). Since when has candidate i America won more than 100% of "registered voters" and no questions are asked of part leaders?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jlblbK3kT0kXX
The new and younger, smarter voters have stood up to the old crap. It will be this way from here on out.
thirdwurldasmeri ka

Crossett, AR

#66886 Dec 3, 2012
i remember the 2000 election very clearly george w bush won albert arnold gore jr los, i remember maxine water standing on the house floor saying "we dont care about the rules of law we wants you as president even if george bush did win"
well

Mason, OH

#66887 Dec 3, 2012
thirdwurldasmerika wrote:
i remember the 2000 election very clearly george w bush won albert arnold gore jr los, i remember maxine water standing on the house floor saying "we dont care about the rules of law we wants you as president even if george bush did win"
Then you know as I stated above he was a selected president. He lost the popular votes and took it to the supreme court, in which, his dad appointed some, to choose the winner, he stole it. His primary interest was to get even with Saddam. Don't twist the situation in what you want it to be, go by facts. Maxine did not state that, she thought the winner should be President, which was Gore, but that is okay, we see what Bush did, also, he is the reason many young people began to interest themselves in politics, which is good, they now know the truth about the wealthy bigots, and war hogs, the republican party. Romney kept the lies going, they read through that also. They may not teach fair politics in the schools there, but the young have access to outside resources not and can figure things out on their own. Those who do not will be the people rejected in the future with their closed mindedness.
GhostofRaygun

Rochester, KY

#66888 Dec 3, 2012
KYMI wrote:
<quoted text>
You can always tell a lib post, it always accuses someone else of what they are guilty of, sending troops into combat and then withholding funding from them, traitors!
Actions speak louder than words.
.
(AP) WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans blocked legislation Wednesday that would have established a $1 billion jobs program putting veterans back to work tending to the country's federal lands and bolstering local police and fire departments.
wtf

Richmond, KY

#66889 Dec 3, 2012
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm alright
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =MHby_TDUHaEXX
You are a stupid dumbass.
wtf

Richmond, KY

#66890 Dec 3, 2012
Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually...that was their "Test Model" for "Obama-Fraud". They targeted Democratic strongholds and used as much as 110% voter registration (as opposed to actual registered voters). Since when has candidate i America won more than 100% of "registered voters" and no questions are asked of part leaders?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =jlblbK3kT0kXX
You ignorant little twerp, you lost get over it.

Since: Dec 11

.

#66892 Dec 3, 2012
Where is the outrage?



Eric holder "REFUSED" to "prosecute" the NBP seen and arrested for voter intimidation.
Yes they were tried...found "Guilty" and in the "Sentenncing phase" of the trial the justice department (at Holders instructions) dropped the charges and walked away! This is reverse racism and voter suppression from a "Horse of another color", but white people are accused of Racism for opposing Susan Rice's nomination to Secretary of State?
She "Failed" to protect Americans.
She "Lied" about the circumstances.
She "Hast a history of Failure".
She continues to LIE!
She refuses to cooperate with a real investigation of the events that transpired in Benghazi, Libya.
The Commander in Chief says she has done an “extraordinary” job? WTF?

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/nov/28...

She presided over a similar situation before...and she doesn't remember that?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Barbourville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
anthony castle 10 min Truth 10
Scotty Trent is a real catch ladies 16 min sad 6
Jobeth hobeth 29 min Bullcreek 5
Unfaithful 53 min Yahweh 13
News Bible study rules for public schools proposed (Feb '10) 53 min CCzar 166,448
Today Eclipse 1 hr Amazed 5
Rodney Bullock 3 hr mindy lou 10

Barbourville Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Barbourville Mortgages