'Fox News Sunday' to Host Kentucky Senate Debate

[ILoveitHere]

Scumbag Of The week: Fox’s Andrea Tantaros

Awarded for the following statement about Newark, New Jersey Mayor Cory Booker spending a week living on the same budget as food stamps allow:

STUART VARNEY (HOST): Could you live on $133 per month for food?

TANTAROS: I should try it because do you know how fabulous I’d look? I’d be so skinny. I mean, the camera adds ten pounds, it really does. I’d be looking great.

Hahahahaha. AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s hilarious!

Millions of Americans are scraping by on what is essentially a starvation diet and Tantaros jokes about how it would be beneficial for losing a few pounds! Get it? It’s funny because it mocks the poor!

The idea of mocking hungry people in the richest country in the world while cheering the policies that put them there in the first place is obscene on so many level that it staggers the imagination. The up side to this is that, which every passing day, it is becoming clear that Fox will not shift its cruel and heartless rhetoric in the slightest and that means the GOP will have to follow and continue to lose elections.

In the meantime…Congratulations, Andrea! You’re a true scumbag! But keep up the good work! America needs you to keep the GOP on the path to extinction!

[Wall Street Government]

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
Republicans were RIGHT; both literally and figuratively, Social Security has been "Fundamentally Transformed" into a "Socialist program".
S.S.I was created for blind and permanently disabled to a program for anyone who is overweight, drug addicted, can't read, got high wrecked a car/truck/ATV and has a bad back (from humping while drunk), etc, etc, etc.
Republicans only want to cut fraud and trim the waste!
I know a woman in W.V. never worked a day in her life, dropped out of H.S.(Never tried for G.E.D. married an illegal (who died after 2 years) has 5 kids (by 3 Baby Daddies) and draws S.S. and S.S.I. and keeps her new illegals boyfriend in weed and other drugs all on our dime!
Republicans would curtail that....and Obama (with your help) will create more of that!

Republicans only want to cut fraud and trim the waste!

You're the first one to mention that, the rest want to privatize it or issue coupons.

EVERYONE wants to cut the fraud and waste.

An owner of a defunct company accused of bilking the Defense Department out of more than $20 million, including charging nearly $1 million to ship two 19-cent washers, pleaded guilty Thursday to federal wire fraud and money laundering.

Charlene Corley owned plumbing and hardware equipment supply company C&D Distributors LLC with her sister, Darlene Wooten, who committed suicide last fall, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

Corley faces as many as 20 years in prison for each of the counts she pleaded guilty to — conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering. In addition, she owes as much as $750,000 in fines, said Assistant U.S. Attorney Kevin McDonald.

The company has repaid the government $4 million, and the government has seized an additional $7 million in cash and other assets, including beach houses and other land, he said.

From 1997 to 2006, Corley and Wooten exploited an automated shipping payment system designed to speed shipments bound for U.S. forces overseas by submitting huge bills to ship inexpensive items, prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said among the fraudulent charges were ones for $998,798 to ship two 19-cent lock washers,$492,097 to ship an $11 threaded plug, and $499,569 to ship 10 cotter pins worth $1.99 each.

We should get rid of the defense department.

They were targets of fraud.

According to teabaggers.

RIGHT?

[repubtards suck]

nehushtan wrote:

<quoted text>ah so people who pay taxes to fund the military don't deserve the same respect that folks in the military do? they didn't work for their benefits?
and you can hem and haw all you want but the military is a socialist system.

I personally know hundreds of military personnel and most of them are on disability while working a full time job with what we have been through I know all of us have scars but! if you can work a full time job you are not disabled I know several that were never in combat that got hardship withdraws and medical withdraws and are on disability through the military and work a full time job once again if you can work you are not disabled I would think these kitten smashers on here would be all over this but you don't hear a peep from them about it like Aristole the holy on here I appreciate all my teammates have done they have been put through hell but this is an issue I stand against what say you? remember it is a volunteer military!

[thirdwurldamerik a]

remeber the lady in new jersey that thye obozo clown was hugging and telling her how help was on the way a month ago, well today that lady said obozos visit was a waste of time shes still waiting on help

[repubtards suck]

KYMI wrote:

Oh Bush, its your fault American Airlines went bankrupt - it had nothing to do with the unions, Oh Bush, GM and the unions had nothing to do with their own demise, Oh Bush, we need more money from those who work to subsidize those of us who won't work, gimme, gimme, gimme, or we will take, take, take, we don't care about fiscal cliffs, downgrading of Americas credit rating, money is our drug, we are addicted, please give us more, the withdraw from money money money is going to hurt soooo bad, lets just forget about it and get high smoking $100 bills, but we won't inhale, Oh Bush, where for art thou oh Bush,

I noticed YOU said " those of US that wont work" so you are saying you won't work! so are you just pissed off because YOU cant get free stuff like you say is being handed out hand over fist?

[anymous]

dead cops kiilling police calif tv investgations

notice all good cops getting killed for fun in middle east notice parades celebrations

all due to snuff porn human trafficing kidnapings stuff---middle east dont you know george bush is the big fish out there your helping kill your own

san mateo county sheriffs office------snuff from mouth of your public speeking mouth today

its the human trafficing

[repubtards suck]

I also noticed even that crazy bitch american bitchgave up and quit posting 24/7 so why don't the rest of you pubtards do that to?

[Aristocles son of Ariston]

nehushtan wrote:

<quoted text>ah so people who pay taxes to fund the military don't deserve the same respect that folks in the military do? they didn't work for their benefits?
and you can hem and haw all you want but the military is a socialist system.

You must be from Mexico...The people who work towards retirement and pay into the Social Security, unemployment insurance, and other retirement programs deserve what they have "EARNED" (by sweat equity). The 'lay on your ass all day' crowd like OWS protesters deserve nothing they have not paid into!
Anyone who has served in the U.S. Armed Forces has EARNED their benefits package (peace time or War time).
The 3rd or fourth generation of H.S. dropouts who never try for a better life...deserve 1/2 my retirement? The Retirement I EARNED?
GO F#@K yourself!

[thirdwurldamerik a]

whats a matter turdtamper the truth from republicans a bitter pill

[Aristocles son of Ariston]

repubtards suck wrote:

I also noticed even that crazy bitch american bitchgave up and quit posting 24/7 so why don't the rest of you pubtards do that to?

Because the HARD Working, Patriotic, God fearin, work for what we have crowd NEVER RUNS from a FIGHT!
This fight is for the AMERICA we LOVE!
Why don't you move to a Socialist/Communist/Country?

[Republican Honey]

repubtards suck wrote:

<quoted text> I personally know hundreds of military personnel and most of them are on dih what we hs but! if youy wh can work a full time job you are not disabled I know several that were never in combat that got hardship withdraws and medical withdraws and are on disability an issue I stand against what say you? remember it is a volunteer military!

Most people are surprised to know that it is possible to work part-time or occasionally and still receive Social Security disability benefits. However, when you stop and think about it, it makes perfect sense that Social Security would not punish someone for at least trying to work because, if they did, no one would ever try. There are two basic situations in which someone who is working may still be entitled to benefits.
The first situation is where a claimant is working part-time on a regular basis, or sporadically works here and there when they are able. Keep in mind that Social Security defines the ability to work as the ability to work "on a regular and continuous basis," and further defines work essentially as a five-day week, eight- hour-a-day effort. If someone chooses to only work part-time, that does not mean he or she is disabled. However, a person who simply cannot work five days a week and/or six to eight hours a day because of their medical problems can argue, often successfully, that the work activity is not "substantial" enough to prevent payment of benefits. A good example of this is the medical conditions fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: With these medical conditions, people often feel quite capable of engaging in daily activities around the house or even work for short periods of time, but their medical condition worsens if they over-do it.
Also, many people find that their condition will prevent them from working for weeks or months at a time, but they are able to work during those times when their condition is not so severe. A good example of this situation is people with bipolar disorder. With this medical problem, people will "cycle" in and out of severely depressed moods; during the significant periods of depression they find that they are unable to perform many everyday tasks, but are usually capable of doing a lot more when they are not depressed. In both situations just described, the claimant could be found disabled and entitled to receive Social Security disability benefits.
Second, some people have returned to work full-time, or are considering a return to full-time employment. Again, that decision does not necessarily mean that disability benefits will be denied. This is a somewhat complicated area of Social Security disability law, but it is possible to say in general that Social Security will permit a disability claimant to work at "substantial" levels for up to nine months (and in some cases six more after that) before they will question whether or not the claimant's benefits will end. In this way, a person can try to work again without worrying that his or her disability claim will be automatically denied. In some cases, a disability claimant has already worked full-time for nine months, or is quite certain that his or her condition has improved and that he or she will be able to work on a regular basis. Even here it may be possible to obtain disability benefits, if your disability stopped you in the past from working for at least a 12-month period.
The decision of whether or not you should attempt to work is complicated, because it involves consideration of personal, medical, vocational and legal issues. While we could never advise you whether or not you should try to work, we will work closely with you in helping you make your decision. The most important thing to remember is that trying to work does not in any way lessen your chances of receiving Social Security disability benefits.
http://www.mydisabilityattorney.com/CM/OtherB...

[Republican Honey]

repubtards suck wrote:

I also noticed even that crazy bitch american bitchgave up and quit posting 24/7 so why don't the rest of you pubtards do that to?

People value their own opinion or they wouldn’t offer it to others.
It’s a sensitive thing for most. Our opinions represent our thoughts and words concerning our experiences over our lifetime.

[wtf]

Republican Honey wrote:

<quoted text>
People value their own opinion or they wouldn’t offer it to others.
It’s a sensitive thing for most. Our opinions represent our thoughts and words concerning our experiences over our lifetime.

You deadbeat pos waste.

lmfao

[wtf]

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
Republicans were RIGHT; both literally and figuratively, Social Security has been "Fundamentally Transformed" into a "Socialist program".
S.S.I was created for blind and permanently disabled to a program for anyone who is overweight, drug addicted, can't read, got high wrecked a car/truck/ATV and has a bad back (from humping while drunk), etc, etc, etc.
Republicans only want to cut fraud and trim the waste!
I know a woman in W.V. never worked a day in her life, dropped out of H.S.(Never tried for G.E.D. married an illegal (who died after 2 years) has 5 kids (by 3 Baby Daddies) and draws S.S. and S.S.I. and keeps her new illegals boyfriend in weed and other drugs all on our dime!
Republicans would curtail that....and Obama (with your help) will create more of that!

You should not talk about your Mom that way stupid.

lmfao

[wtf]

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
You must be from Mexico...The people who work towards retirement and pay into the Social Security, unemployment insurance, and other retirement programs deserve what they have "EARNED" (by sweat equity). The 'lay on your ass all day' crowd like OWS protesters deserve nothing they have not paid into!
Anyone who has served in the U.S. Armed Forces has EARNED their benefits package (peace time or War time).
The 3rd or fourth generation of H.S. dropouts who never try for a better life...deserve 1/2 my retirement? The Retirement I EARNED?
GO F#@K yourself!

You lay on your fat ass all Day every Day you Republitard pos.

[ILoveitHere]

Aristocles son of Ariston wrote:

<quoted text>
Because the HARD Working, Patriotic, God fearin, work for what we have crowd NEVER RUNS from a FIGHT!
This fight is for the AMERICA we LOVE!
Why don't you move to a Socialist/Communist/Country?

Why would we leave? We like it here. You don't.

"The Republican party has a party of ‘followership.’ The problem with Republican leaders is that they’re cowards, not that they’re fundamentally mistaken. The real locus of the problem is the GOP activist base and the Republican donor base. They went apocalyptic over the past four years and that was exploited by a lot of people in the conservative world. I won’t soon forget the lupine smile that play over the head of one major conservative institution when he told me that our donors think that the apocalypse has arrived…that Republicans have been fleeced and exploited, and lied to by a conservative entertainment complex."
-David Frum, once a speechwriter for President George W Bush

You kind of have to read between the lines but it’s pretty clear: Fox and AM hate radio control the course of the GOP and they do not have the GOP’s best interests in mind. This was proven several times in 2009 when politician after politician was forced to bow and scrape before “Boss” Limbaugh and by Frum’s previous prescient statement,“Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us, and now we are discovering we work for Fox.” Now Frum has made it clear that the GOP has been played to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars by what Frum has accurately labeled the “conservative entertainment complex.”

Fox and AM hate radio do not traffic in news; they traffic in fear, hate and outrage. That is what keeps their audience riveted and trapped in a bubble of nonsense If they were to start reporting the actual news, they would lose half their audience and they know it. As long as this paradigm exists, the GOP will be forced to play to that audience of amped up paranoid conspiracy nuts. Fox and AM has a choke hold on a lucrative market segment an they’ll never let it go as long as they can profit off of lying to it.

Fox and AM hate radio are literally parasites feeding off of the GOP and they are rapidly killing it.

[Republican Honey]

ILoveitHere wrote:

<quoted text>

Had to remove your post.

FNC saw a large ratings jump during the early stages of the Iraq conflict. According to some reports, at the height of the conflict Fox News had as much as a 300-percent increase in viewership (averaging 3.3 million viewers daily).[35]

In 2004, FNC's ratings for its broadcast of the Republican National Convention exceeded those of all three broadcast networks. During President George W. Bush's address, Fox News attracted 7.3 million viewers nationally; NBC, ABC, and CBS had a viewership of 5.9 million, 5.1 million and 5.0 million respectively.

In late 2005 and early 2006, FNC saw a brief decline in ratings. One decline was in the second quarter of 2006, when Fox News lost viewers for every prime-time program compared with the previous quarter. The audience for Special Report with Brit Hume, for example, dropped 19 percent. Several weeks later, in the wake of the North Korean missile crisis and the 2006 Lebanon War, Fox saw a surge in viewership and remained the #1-rated cable news channel.[36][37] Fox produced eight of the top ten most-watched nightly cable news shows, with The O'Reilly Factor and Hannity & Colmes finishing first and second respectively.[38]

FNC ranked No. 8 for all cable channels in 2006, and No. 6 in 2007.[39] The channel ranked No. 1 during the week of Barack Obama's election (November 3–9) in 2008, and reached the top spot again in January 2010 (during the week of the special Senate election in Massachusetts).[40] Comparing Fox to its 24-hour-news-channel competitors, in May 2010 the channel drew an average daily prime-time audience of 1.8 million (versus 747,000 for MSNBC and 595,000 for CNN).[41]

In September 2009, the Pew Research Center published a report on the public view of national news organizations. The report indicated that 72 percent of Republican Fox viewers rated the channel as "favorable", while 43 percent of Democratic viewers and 55 percent of all viewers shared that opinion. However, Fox had the highest "unfavorable" rating of all national outlets studied (25 percent of all viewers). The report went on to say, "partisan differences in views of Fox News have increased substantially since 2007".[42]

As of January 2011, Public Policy Polling reported that Fox News Channel was the second-most trusted television news network in the United States, with 42 percent of respondents reporting they trusted the network compared to other news channels (behind PBS at 50 percent and ahead of NBC at 41 percent, CNN at 40 percent, CBS at 36 percent and ABC at 35 percent). Fox News Channel is also ranked the most distrusted news channel in the U.S., with 46 percent of respondents reporting they distrust the network (behind PBS at 30 percent, NBC at 41 percent and CNN, CBS, and ABC each at 43 percent). This represented a combined 16-percent drop among respondents from the year before, and placed the channel fourth among Americans in trust-distrust (behind PBS, NBC, and CNN and ahead of CBS and ABC). Most of this drop was the result of an increase in distrust among moderates and liberals. While conservatives largely held the same view of the network as they did the year before (dropping from 75 to 72 percent), moderates and liberals increased their distrust of the network (from 48 to 60 percent among moderates, and 66 to 82 percent among liberals). Of the poll's respondents, 18 percent identified as liberal, 41 percent as moderate and 40 percent as conservative; 40 percent identified as Democratic, 37 percent as Republican and 23 percent as independent or "other".[43][44]

On the night of October 22, 2012, Fox set a record for its highest-rated telecast ever, with 11.5 million viewers for the third U.S. presidential debate.[45][46] In prime time the week before, Fox averaged almost 3.7 million viewers with a total day average of 1.66 million viewers.[47]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fox_news

[AnnAgain]

Jay wrote:

KYMI, That was some article by Stanislav Mishin.
He really hit the nail on the head. Too bad we have such brain dead liberals in this country, and they would probably put a NUT on the article.
We are becoming the laughing stock of the world thanks to the low life crap that was elected to run this country!

You are piece of dogshit aren't ya ... and a very sore loser HAHAhaaaa

[Republican Honey]

With 600,000-plus citizens from all 50 states advocating secession, Barack Obama has finally united the country.

After ingesting millions of campaign ads Nov. 6, 2012, marks the day America awoke, hung over, to view the carnage that 51 percent of them wrought. Result: a national tipping point into socialism and theft of property, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by the “have-nots” i.e., illegals and those unwilling to work but more than happy to enjoy taxpayer-financed health care, food stamps (liquor, cigarettes) and other “entitlements.”

Add to that life-sucking cabal a Congress that cannot stop spending and refuses to live within a balanced budget and we have more than one “fiscal cliff” ahead of us.

We’ve allowed an underperforming community organizer to cobble together a voting horde that wants something for nothing. They think nothing of taking from those who get up every morning, go to work, obey the law and pay taxes.

We are living through what happens when “bleeding heart” liberals allow illegal aliens to rape our economy; fill our jails; and procreate a generation of their citizen offspring who are poised to hold “America’s back door” open for millions of other illegals; to take our jobs and drain our hospitals, schools and eventually our economy. Nothing lasts forever, and most everything goes in cycles.

Does anyone really think that a dictator can never govern the U.S.? Name a nation that has not experienced that fate at one time or another. If the current crushing unemployment numbers blow past the current 7.9 percent, and prices skyrocket, how long before the proverbial “wheels” come off and martial law needs to be enacted?

“No nation is more than three square meals from a revolution.”

Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/entitlements-...

[wtf]

Republican Honey wrote:

With 600,000-plus citizens from all 50 states advocating secession, Barack Obama has finally united the country.
After ingesting millions of campaign ads Nov. 6, 2012, marks the day America awoke, hung over, to view the carnage that 51 percent of them wrought. Result: a national tipping point into socialism and theft of property, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by the “have-nots” i.e., illegals and those unwilling to work but more than happy to enjoy taxpayer-financed health care, food stamps (liquor, cigarettes) and other “entitlements.”
Add to that life-sucking cabal a Congress that cannot stop spending and refuses to live within a balanced budget and we have more than one “fiscal cliff” ahead of us.
We’ve allowed an underperforming community organizer to cobble together a voting horde that wants something for nothing. They think nothing of taking from those who get up every morning, go to work, obey the law and pay taxes.
We are living through what happens when “bleeding heart” liberals allow illegal aliens to rape our economy; fill our jails; and procreate a generation of their citizen offspring who are poised to hold “America’s back door” open for millions of other illegals; to take our jobs and drain our hospitals, schools and eventually our economy. Nothing lasts forever, and most everything goes in cycles.
Does anyone really think that a dictator can never govern the U.S.? Name a nation that has not experienced that fate at one time or another. If the current crushing unemployment numbers blow past the current 7.9 percent, and prices skyrocket, how long before the proverbial “wheels” come off and martial law needs to be enacted?
“No nation is more than three square meals from a revolution.”
Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/entitlements-...

Let us know when you get to 60,000,000 dumbass.