Are you speaking from authority, or just speaking?<quoted text>
Many believe the problem is the WH and the State Dept. for failing to provide the protection prior to the terrorist murdering the ambassador.
And you know this because you are part of the intelligence community and/or DOS, or just speaking from supposition?<quoted text>Of course the reason Ms.Rice was chosen to do spiel the talking points was because she had no knowledge otherwise.
That is probably true given she was a first party witness to any of it, unless you're implying she was in Benghazi masterminding and/or investigating the riot and subsequent murder.<quoted text>They fed her the info she used.
And yet you're claiming to know exactly what transpired and posting it on here; where did you gather your intelligence? And having known what really happened, why didn't you contact the DOS and let them know what was being planned. There were other posts that were attacked that same day too and other in subsequent days to come. Why did you hold on to this information until now?<quoted text>Should have checked out the info before talking points were spread for her weeks exposure.
Looks like? I could make up all kinds of scenarios with little to no information but I don't have people breathing down my back for answers and acting all self-righteous and omniscient.<quoted text>Bad for her,but also looks as though the WH did this on purpose,don`t you think?
Ah so you know this from first person experience and as a witness? Why are you posting this information on topix, shouldn't you be in a congressional committee somewhere being rigorously questioned and awarded medals for opening the lid on pandoras box?<quoted text>This has moved the quest to question Ms.Rice rather than why the State Dept.left the ambassador out to dry.The whole thing is a messy cover-up.