Too much FAUX?<quoted text>
Been on a shopping rampage with my daughter today and am just catching up. But lots to read here in a short time. Can't believe the people on here who are so ill informed about the new bills signed by the president - all of which are quite infringing on American's 4th Amendment protections: search and seizure.
Obama signed into law in December of 2011 on New Year’s Eve, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and then, in March of 2012, Obama signed the National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order (NDRP). All fancy titles which nobody pays much attention to but are huge violations of our freedoms.
Basically the right to detain an American citizen indefinitely and even assassinate them, if they are suspected of terrorism—without due process.
And...peacetime martial law, giving the President authority over food and water, production, fuel, transportation, livestock and more.
Now you tell me why the president feels the need to such laws unless they have reason to fear the citizenry of this country. And why do you suppose that is?
NDAA Expansion of the President's power to declare martial law under revisions to the Insurrection Act, and take charge of United States National Guard troops without state governor authorization when public order has been lost and the state and its constituted authorities cannot enforce the law was a bill passed in the United States Congress on September 29, 2006 and signed by President GEORGE W. BUSH on October 17, 2006 becoming Public Law 109-364. House Vote - 396 Ayes (168 Democrats/1 I) with 31 Nays and 5 present not voting.
According to The International Business Times, "The bill affirms and codifies the U.S. President's authority to indefinitely detain in military custody anyone, including U.S. citizens, suspected of terrorism or supporting terrorists."
In a statement released after the signing of the bill, Obama says, "I want to clarify that my Administration will not authorize the indefinite military detention without trial of American citizens. Indeed, I believe that doing so would break with our most important traditions and values as a Nation."
Even though Obama signed the bill he does not agree with everything that's included in the bill.
"I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation, and prosecution of suspected terrorists," Obama said.
CBS news reports, "If Mr. Obama violates any of the provisions in the bill, Congress could challenge the White House in court, which would have the final say in any dispute."
The $662 billion bill also includes tough sanctions against Iran over its nuclear program and allocates money for the military.
NDAA was sponsored by Howard McKeon REPUBLICAN Representative from California. The bill was introduced on April 13th.
The Constitution, as of September 2001, does allow for the use of military force against United States citizens. The Supreme Court ruled the Authorization for Military Force (AUMF) Constitutional:
“(a) IN GENERAL‐ That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.”- Authorization for Use of Military Force (P.L. 107‐40) Enacted: Sept. 18, 2001