From a lot of websites. The Catholics are in denial. can you imagine what it means if you rewrite scriptures?<quoted text>
I didn't know you were a Seventh Day Adventist or a Oneness Pentecostal. All of these are from their websites.
I will only deal with this one. Anyone can read the whole paragraph and see that you go the point of lying to further your denial The paragraph says that this eyewitness saw the unaltered book of Matthew and it may have been the original. The fact it was the unaltered version means Eusebius was aware of an altered version. He quotes the unaltered version. Whether it was the original or not is irrelevant as we know for a fact that the copy we have in our bibles today is not the original. It is nothing but dishonesty to disqualify the statement of Eusebius because he was not sure it was the very original book. He did know it was the unaltered book. History is biased because of pick and choose lairs down through the ages that would do anything to promote their version regardless of the truth. Such is this post.<quoted text>
2nd Paragraph. "Could have been". not true
Demonstratio Evangelica" by Eusebius:
Eusebius was the Church historian and Bishop of Caesarea. On page 152 Eusebius quotes the early book of Matthew that he had in his library in Caesarea. According to this eyewitness of an unaltered Book of Matthew that could have been the original book or the first copy of the original of Matthew. Eusebius informs us of Jesus' actual words to his disciples in the original text of Matthew 28:19: "With one word and voice He said to His disciples: "Go, and make disciples of all nations in My Name, teaching them to observe all things whatsover I have commanded you." That "Name" is Jesus.