A pit-bull ban in Westwego? What's a ...

A pit-bull ban in Westwego? What's a pit bull?

There are 1 comment on the nola.com story from Mar 19, 2013, titled A pit-bull ban in Westwego? What's a pit bull?. In it, nola.com reports that:

Westwego City Councilmen Glenn Green certainly means well. After a 54-year-old constituent dear to the councilman's heart was mauled nearly to death by three of four pit bulls she and her boyfriend kept in their Avenue A home, Green said he wants Westwego to ban pit bulls and maybe Rottweillers too while they're at it.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at nola.com.

Dorothy Pipher

Marrero, LA

#1 Mar 20, 2013
To be useful, legislation must be effective, enforceable, economical, and reasonably fair.
This legislation is motivated by fear and lack of
relevant knowledge..
The media and the inexperienced would have you believe that these breeds are vicious and
should be prohibited. However, these very breeds as a whole have proven their stability and good
canine citizenry by becoming 'Search & Rescue dogs, Therapy dogs working inside hospitals,
professional Herding dogs and family companions for years.
Our Country was not founded on the restriction and punishment of the masses based on the
actions of a few... when has this changed?
A five year study published in the Cincinnati Law Review in 1982, vol. 53, pg. 1077, which
specifically considered both Rottweilers and "pit bulls", concluded in part that:
...statistics did not support the assertion that any one breed was
dangerous,..when legislation is focused on the type of dog it fails,
because it is ... unenforceable, confusing, and costly... focusing
legislation on dogs that are "vicious" distracts attention from the
real problem, which is irresponsible owners.
In light of this and other studies, we urge you to take the following actions:
1. Reject the current legislation, which is contrary to fact and distracts from the real issue, that of
responsible ownership.
2. Actively pursue legislation that would render owners liable for the actions of their pets, such as
a good non-breed specific dangerous dog law. We suggest that the appropriate policy should be
"blame the owner, not the dog." Owners can and should take responsibility for their pets.
Bottom line: the legislation proposed will not only be unfair for responsible citizens but it
addresses the wrong problem. Voting for this proposal as it stands only harms the law abiding
responsible dog owner

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Avondale Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Morons Living Below Sea Level 14 hr Katrina 1
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 16 hr Mother Mcreeeeee 20,096
Commercial Construction Recommendation Needed f... Wed Steve 1
Happy 10th Birthday Hurricane Katrina Wed Katrina 4
News Religious leaders speak out against Confederate... Tue RevKen 2
NO ILLEGALS DRUGS in U.S. Aug 24 NO DRUGS ILLEGALS... 1
Review: ALM Gateway To Success Aug 23 The truth 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Avondale Mortgages