Plan Would Put Collinsville Dams Back...

Plan Would Put Collinsville Dams Back To Work

There are 112 comments on the Hartford Courant story from Jan 13, 2009, titled Plan Would Put Collinsville Dams Back To Work. In it, Hartford Courant reports that:

Waste gate controls sit idle and are covered with snow at the upper dam and powerhouse on the Farmington River in Collinsville, unused and deteriorating since they ceased producing power in the 1960s.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hartford Courant.

First Prev
of 6
Next Last
Keith J Robbins

Killingworth, CT

#1 Jan 13, 2009
This is a for profit venture, if a private company were going to do this they would have to raise capital. That being said public funds from sources other than Canton should not be used. Good luck with the DEP and EPA.
Bill

United States

#2 Jan 13, 2009
Why would you need "legislation"? I can see permits being required.$8-!0 million seems low, especially if fish ladders need to be built. A great idea, though. Needs professional study and cost estimate. Go to Iceland to see excellent hydro-electric power facilities. Many un-manned. Monitored and operated by remote control.
UNCLE SAM IS BACK

Southbury, CT

#3 Jan 13, 2009
Conn originaly built its prosperity on hydro power my god this state is riddled with these dams we could cut our import of electricity by 30%
Borris Badenov

Hartford, CT

#4 Jan 13, 2009
Bill wrote:
Why would you need "legislation"? I can see permits being required.$8-!0 million seems low,
That's just for legal fees to fight the NIMBYs and BANANAs. They're already getting organized.
Bulls-eye BIlly

Rocky Hill, CT

#5 Jan 13, 2009
Borris Badenov wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just for legal fees to fight the NIMBYs and BANANAs. They're already getting organized.
Right on - and the fact that the GOVERNMENT will have to grant a license, grant permits, and by the time it is done, 10 million will seem like a drop in the bucket.- exactly why the dams were not revitalized in the 70's - for a project that is almost all already there.
no common sense
Old Navy Gunner

New Hartford, CT

#6 Jan 13, 2009
Rainbow dam ,way down the Farmington, were built to promote salmon fishing. The very few salmon, perhaps 50-60 a year are trapped and transported by truck to hatcheries. This salmon program has cost millions a year for 25 years and has produced zilch. Time to stop wasting money on it!!!!!
doug

Manchester, CT

#7 Jan 13, 2009
I don't see any reason not to get this done. If the money can't come from grants, make it a loan. The revenue would seem to pay pay the loan in not too many years.

We should be looking at all sources of energy like this throughout the state. Why build expensive nuclear plants, windmills, import expensive Canadian power etc. when we already have power sources here in CT. Every little bit helps.
Reality Check

East Hartford, CT

#8 Jan 13, 2009
First, a Selectman in a small town has no business being in charge of a hydroelectric dam. Who in Canton is qualified for this work?

Second, I agree with the above posters. This is an excellent idea, if the right operations manager is chosen. DEP needs to wave the fish ladders. There are none there now, why is this an issue? Does anyone have existing condition in their vocabulary anymore?

Third, just get it done, wave all public hearings by state statute. This is the primary reasons why our energy is sky high.

And to the poster above, about New Zealand, they do not have our Environmental or Safety laws. This is how countries like New Zealand and China are able to just go and put in dams. I am not saying this is right either, because virgin environments have been damaged, forever.
Reality Check

East Hartford, CT

#9 Jan 13, 2009
Old Navy Gunner wrote:
Rainbow dam ,way down the Farmington, were built to promote salmon fishing. The very few salmon, perhaps 50-60 a year are trapped and transported by truck to hatcheries. This salmon program has cost millions a year for 25 years and has produced zilch. Time to stop wasting money on it!!!!!
Thank you for your service to our country.

Go Army beat Navy...HooRah!
Cost effective

Old Lyme, CT

#10 Jan 13, 2009
What the courant fails to mention is how long it will take for the taxpayers to get their money back. By taxpayers I mean all taxpayers, federal and state.
Is it 5 years or 50 or 500years before this project actually becomes cost effective?
Just because the government is willing to spend money, doesn't always mean that it should...
Topper

Canterbury, CT

#11 Jan 13, 2009
Borris Badenov wrote:
<quoted text>
That's just for legal fees to fight the NIMBYs and BANANAs. They're already getting organized.
Wow, you must be prescient. So tell us: who in Canton, Avon, or Burlington is "getting organized" to oppose this? And why?
Reality Check

East Hartford, CT

#12 Jan 13, 2009
Topper wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, you must be prescient. So tell us: who in Canton, Avon, or Burlington is "getting organized" to oppose this? And why?
Oh just wait, Trout Unlimited, Farmington River Watershed Association, I guarantee a grass roots group will be formed.
Dave

Hartford, CT

#13 Jan 13, 2009
With an existing dam already in place, this is a great place to generate electricity. It should have minimal inpact that the DEP or EPA can object to. Diversify our energy sources to include more hydro generation and less carbon burning sources is a win-win. We should add more hydro producing capabilities to any existing dam.
Anon

Rocky Hill, CT

#14 Jan 13, 2009
What hasn't been mentioned in the article is that under current renewable legislation a hydro generator using a dam is not eligible for renewable certification. The renewable laws only recognize "run of the river" facilities as hydro renewable. If this facility is restored and continues to use the dam, it will not be certifiable.
Ian

Winsted, CT

#15 Jan 13, 2009
This one really is a no-brainer. The dams are there, the power houses are there... I can see no environmental damage from running the water through a turbine rather than over the dam, and a positive benefit if fish ladders are installed. Plus generating no-carbon, no waste power.

Now if the various so-called 'green' groups would get behind the project a boost it, wouldn't that be lovely! One can dream...
Bill Sullivan

Suffield, CT

#16 Jan 13, 2009
Good to read about forward-thinking Green projects. Please keep it up. In fact, could you create a new category on your main page: CT Green news?

Great graphic image, too, on how a turbine works!
Good Greef

Boston, MA

#17 Jan 13, 2009
I expect at some point, perhaps quietly, those who use oil to power generators that produce electricity will get involved to find a way to halt this. If word got out that a natural resource could take away from the oil fired turbines that are used in the North east, it would damage the oil companies pockets. for years the oil companies have been able to put restraints on wind and solar development!

I for one, hope this Canton idea spreads!
Dan G

Massapequa, NY

#18 Jan 13, 2009
Don't forget the fish ladder when you refurbish the dams.
Great Idea for Collinsville Dam
Psychotic Hamster

Gales Ferry, CT

#19 Jan 13, 2009
I support this project only if it does not rais taxes. I am already near a point of having to move out because of the money that is removed from my pocket.
Blorf

Boston, MA

#20 Jan 13, 2009
Good Greef wrote:
I expect at some point, perhaps quietly, those who use oil to power generators that produce electricity will get involved to find a way to halt this. If word got out that a natural resource could take away from the oil fired turbines that are used in the North east, it would damage the oil companies pockets. for years the oil companies have been able to put restraints on wind and solar development!
I for one, hope this Canton idea spreads!
Excellent point. For those that DO know their history, this has been tried before only to be mysteriously shut down! To those that check this as wrong or clueless...check your history!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Avon Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Board of Selectmen Meeting August 29, 2016 11 hr Joan Coe 1
Public Hearing on Lease to Ameresco Inc. for So... 12 hr joan coe 1
News Gay Marriage (Mar '09) Aug 20 newsb 482
Vote for Hillary Aug 18 GetReal 2
News More Advice On Acura TL Transmission Failures A... (Apr '09) Aug 17 Justin 2002 tl s 314
Strange woman on Unionville Bridge? (Jul '10) Aug 12 Eva 8
Board of Selectmen Meeting August 8, 2016 My co... Aug 8 joan coe 1

Avon Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Avon Mortgages