The Yauna takabara and the ancient Macedonians

Recent research has provided unambiguous details concerning the ethnological classification of the ancient Macedonians, including from another source that lies outside the Greek world, which removes all doubt that had existed concerning the Hellenic nature of this nation.

[Strategos]

Nice and informative. Lets hear what "the sons of the flowers and the sun" have to say on the issue...

[Symiakos]

I bet one of the Skop numb skulls that grace this forum, tell us that the inscriptions (old Persian), are actually ancient Macedonoid Makedonski inscriptions.

XD

[TRUTHPREVAILS]

Symiakos wrote:

I bet one of the Skop numb skulls that grace this forum, tell us that the inscriptions (old Persian), are actually ancient Macedonoid Makedonski inscriptions.
XD

lololol.....naw dont think the slavs can get away with this one///:)) the persians are pretty clear as they said Macedonians are Greek----""" ""Thus for the Persians the Macedonians were Greeks with shieldlike headcoverings(same language,same customs,and same habits)""" "HECK even the Spartans would agree with the Persians on this one.........

[hic Rhodus]

Strategos wrote:

Nice and informative. Lets hear what "the sons of the flowers and the sun" have to say on the issue...

They 'll say that the ancient Greeks paid 5.000 drachmas to the
Persians in order to call the Macedonians "Yauna Takabara".

[Alexander]

Funny, none of the ancient inscriptions mentioned modern-day turkish refugee bloggers posing as ancient Macedonians while simultaneously pretending to be modern-day ancient Greeks.

Must be in some other Persian's tomb.

Keep digging gypsyies!

[Symiakos]

Alexander wrote:

Funny, none of the ancient inscriptions mentioned modern-day turkish refugee bloggers posing as ancient Macedonians while simultaneously pretending to be modern-day ancient Greeks.
Must be in some other Persian's tomb.
Keep digging gypsyies!

How could they have mentioned Turks, when the word/name Turk did not exist in Old Persian?

The Persians did mention the Macedonians as being Greeks though! ;))

Straws.....clutching....hard.. ..

BTW...FYROM has one of the highest populations of Slaviciezed Turks within it's newly found borders.

Got Turk in ya??

The funny thing is, you believe your an ancient ethnic Macedonoid Makedonski, where god has chosen your sorry lot as the progenitors of human civilization when he spoke to your delusional lot through the TV screen!

XD

Now that's funny shite!

[Alexander]

Symiakos wrote:

<quoted text>
How could they have mentioned Turks, when the word/name Turk did not exist in Old Persian?
The Persians did mention the Macedonians as being Greeks though! ;))
Straws.....clutching....hard.. ..
BTW...FYROM has one of the highest populations of Slaviciezed Turks within it's newly found borders.
Got Turk in ya??
The funny thing is, you believe your an ancient ethnic Macedonoid Makedonski, where god has chosen your sorry lot as the progenitors of human civilization when he spoke to your delusional lot through the TV screen!
XD
Now that's funny shite!

I thought I told you to keep digging gypsy!

[Symiakos]

Alexander wrote:

<quoted text>
I thought I told you to keep digging gypsy!

I don't listen all too well...got selective reading, especially when it comes to malakies from Skops.

Maybe I'll dig my way to your place, and we can go out for an ice cold frappe! ;)

[REALITYCHECK]

Strategos wrote:

Nice and informative. Lets hear what "the sons of the flowers and the sun" have to say on the issue...

lololololol........ABSOLUTELY NOTHING THE SLAVS WERE NOT THERE IN TIMEbc AT THAT TIME ONLY THE GREEKS AND PERSIANS WERE THERE.......LOLOLOLOL......... NOPE NOT AT ALL--- THE PERSIANS DID NOT MISTAKE THE GREEKS AND THE MACEDONIAN STATE WAS NO LESS GREEK THAN THE SPARTAN STATE ACCORDING TO THE PERSIANS THEY CONFIRMED IT ON STONE..........IN BC YES BC BEFORE CHRIST........./

[hic Rhodus]

Alexander wrote:

Funny, none of the ancient inscriptions mentioned modern-day turkish refugee bloggers posing as ancient Macedonians while simultaneously pretending to be modern-day ancient Greeks.
Must be in some other Persian's tomb.
Keep digging gypsyies!

O.K. A R Y A N
http://www.bulgarmak.org/macedonians_protesti...

[STORI]

Ha ha ha. HUh how overwhelming evidence. LOL LOL LOL.
Man these greek malakas are hilarious.

Don´t forget mongrels that in the Macedonian language Yauna or rather today spelled junak means brave warrior/hero. So if this name Yauna takanabara means anything it means Bravo warriors with hats. Sorry to drop the bad news to you greeks (although I´m not sure what is even greek on you)

[STORI]

It should say brave wrriors with hats (of certain kind)

[STORI]

LOL. Brave warriors with hats.

[hic Rhodus]

STORI wrote:

It should say brave wrriors with hats (of certain kind)

With all the respect on your scientific value in linguistics I
dare to object some points:
1-The evolution from the ancient Macedonian YAUNA to modern JUNAK
is dubious:I can't explain the transformation of the vowel Y into
syristic J.Usually Y becomes in modern macedonian Z .So after my calculations the word should take the form of ZUNAK in modern
macedonian as we saw it clearly already in the rosetta stone.
I continue below

[hic Rhodus]

STORI wrote:

Don´t forget mongrels that in the Macedonian language Yauna or rather today spelled junak means brave warrior/hero. So if this name Yauna takanabara means anything it means Bravo warriors with hats.

2-I disagree also with the word TAKANABARA.I dont'know if you are
familiar with Persian of the third century B.C.but I believe that
the first part of this compound word (TAKANA)does not mean 'hat'.
Takana is produced by permutation of the last two syllables 'na ka'
Thus the correct form was TANAKA and not takana.Due to the sibilant pronounciation of T as Ts in old Persian we have TSANAKA
that means TUREEN. To be continued

[hic Rhodus]

The ancient macedonians also borrowed the word from the Persians so it means tureen too.
Thus Yauna Tsanakabara in ancient Macedonian
means Brave warriors with tureens on(their heads).
I think it makes sense.The Macedonians were practical people.The tureens were made of zinc.
So they were using the tsanakas (tureens)as hats
but also as plates or dishes for eating and also
as shields.
With scientific respect,pozdrav

[Istor]

Whoever denies Macedonians' Greekness is ignoramus or idiot or an imbecile SlavoSkopian propagandist.

[Massedonian Hysterian]

Istor wrote:

Whoever denies Macedonians' Greekness is ignoramus or idiot or an imbecile SlavoSkopian propagandist.

I think the Greeks must have fabricated the evidence by carrying a mountain to Persia and falsifying the real grave of Darius. After secretly digging out a monument on the rockface overnight they must have added some writing in Persian that the ancient Macedonians were Greeks with silly hats. How lame.

No matter how hard Greeks try to hide the truth there is always someone out there who will expose it!

[Arrianos]

Bravo for the post "The Yauna takabara and the ancient Macedonians" .
Skopians should be ashamed once again.Their only connection to Macedonia is the usurpation of a totaly Greek name .

[hic Rhodus]

STORI wrote:

LOL. Brave warriors with hats.

Mr.Stori you did not answer to my post.I am curious to have
your opinion about this issue.What's the problem?You don't
fell well maybe?
Pozdrav again.