Longtime GOP Texas Gov. Perry wins another term

Republican Gov. Rick Perry has defeated Democrat Bill White to win a third four-year term as Texas governor. Full Story
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18570 Jun 26, 2013
justasayin wrote:
<quoted text>I'm sorry, this one....makes no sense...AZ, Jan Brewer??????????
HA, ha you can be so funny. Thought you were savvy enough to know the Governor of AZ. Back into the chasm you go..
Time to paint ourselves as the Indians of 1773 and run down to the voting booths this 2014 and cast out the Tea. Out unto the waters of political oblivion. Republicans od sound mind and integrity will help us in that endeavor.
Senator Susan Collins {R Traditionalist} of Main,“finds it baffling that it’s a small minority of our caucus, that is holding up going to conference, when our party for years, has argued that we need to have a budget. Without a House conference we can’t possibly complete action on it.”
Senator Marco Rubio {R Tea Party} of Florida argues that we should continue to support the ideology that ONE Senator can have the power to hold the USA Hostage and Ransom it off to what that Senator desires.
Democrats counter with the need of raising the debt ceiling to cover the cost of the Congresses’ expenditures. Republicans inability to produce a bill for a budget, mandates this process of hand to mouth budgeting scenarios. Ideologies of the Tea Party pirates lurking in the shadows .“Our Way Or The Highway reverberating through our Congressional Sacred Hallways.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18571 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets blame the housing crash on anyone but the Banking Queen, A.K.A. Bawney Fwanks. LOL
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =ZwVWXN0Pyq4XX
LOL yes we know who failed us and they confessed. This is a repeat as is your drivel.Your Tin Hat is getting rusty..
Predators that walk amongst us.
Paulson admits deregulation has failed us all

By MarketWatch
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch)-- You know things are very very bad on Wall Street when a guy like Henry Paulson -- Treasury secretary, solid Republican, and former Goldman Sachs CEO -- joins the crowd calling for more regulation over the financial markets.
Paulson spared no one in his criticism Thursday of the excesses of deregulation that has now created the worst global financial crisis in a generation, threatening the health of the U.S. economy, the savings of millions of Americans, and the survival of some of the biggest financial institutions in the world.
Wall Street and Washington both failed big time, he said. Wall Street invented new ways to make money by selling securities so complicated that no one could really follow which shell the pea was under. Fortunes were made on the paper Wall Street sold.
At the same time, Washington's watchdogs were dozing, tranquilized by the false assurance that Wall Street would police its own.
It's been obvious for years now that Wall Street could not be trusted, and finally official Washington agrees. The markets need a tougher cop to make sure that money-center banks, investment banks, credit-rating agencies, hedge funds, mortgage brokers and the rest don't let their own greed and arrogance ruin it for the rest of us.
"Regulation needs to catch up with innovation," Paulson said, and he was backed up by the rest of President Bush's working group on financial markets, including Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Securities and Exchange Commissioner Chris Cox. Not a commie among them.
The housing bubble wasn't a flaw; it was a predictable outcome of a system that rewarded smart people small fortunes for conjuring up ways to persuade people to borrow more than they could ever hope to pay back. All the profits were taken off the table quickly, but the staggering costs are only now being paid by homeowners, shareholders, builders and the rest of society.
Paulson's proposals won't necessarily prevent a recurrence, but they are a humble recognition that the centerpiece of two decades of Republican economic policy have failed.
-- Rex Nutting, Washington bureau chief
Republicans have not strayed from their previous agendas other than to increase the probabilities of failure.
Now If you desire I can demonstrate what they are referring to. Hint; Paulson’s derivatives on Goldman Sach’s that he sold to Main Street. Let me know. Before these regulations on financials that Obama Passed in May of 2010 go into affect.{Volcker Rule}. You could make a bundle with Paulson’s simple formula garner vast sums of wealth..
3 years ago when republicans denied their own leadership on manufacturing issues; http://youtu.be/vPs1eMsK4Hw Yup same one that obstructs aid to hurricane, flood, fire, tornado victims would see the mass destruction of our manufacturing. Observe how he scrounges up $300 Million to give to Avondale shipyards, in Alabama to shut down and fire 5,000 employees. South Korea sends him their appreciation. That what you are about. Pitiful.


Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18572 Jun 26, 2013
Waco 1909 wrote:
Nice decision on the voting rights act by the Supreme Court today.
Hey there in is an opportunity. Longer lines. Will they be serving refreshments? Get it?? Back to the chasm for you..
Republican chasm continues to widen. Perhaps the established conservative republicans will finally emulate our for fathers of 1773 and cast out the dysfunctional Tea Party.
Tea Rally back in April, Senator Ted Cruz {R Tea Party} of Texas, taunts the traditionalist republicans after the Senate rejects back ground checks on gun control bill. Cruz along with the all Tea Party members threatened to filibuster away this bill. Established conservative republican considered it more prudent and wiser to let it go to a vote. This would garnish a few democratic votes. Which is what eventually happened. Cruz considers republicans that choose that method of governmental as “Squishy”. Our way or the highway is all that is required. Wall Street Journal Editorial retweeted John McCain {R Traditionalist}; “ Would it have been right for us to not even debate, in light of the Newtown Massacre” Depth of chasm deepens.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18573 Jun 26, 2013
Truth is might wrote:
<quoted text>
You misunderstand. I am talking about the whites in America who are poor but, have to suffer with it because they are white.
They will not get out of poverty because they cannot buy educatioon for their children. There are no scholarships for white children. If whites are the majority population, isn't white poverty a national poverty?
Can see you are one of the less developed. Whites majority? Hmm think that is not so or it soon will be so. So, so what? Its your narrow minded inequality that keeps us in the 23rd position in this more advanced world.
UN exposes Inequality
UNDP { the UN Development Program} measures the “Human Development” factors. Income, health and education. It then applies the inequality factors for results.
Before factoring the inequality factor; USA comes in fourth, following Australia, The Netherlands and Norway.
After the factoring of the inequality factor; USA comes in 23 third. All European Nations and all Scandinavian Nations that have Universal Education, Health Care and Income Security exceeds the USA.
USA counters the its to finically expensive and will slow growth. Sweden’s former finance minister proves this to be false. Stating the robust growth of his nation during the years of 2000 to 2010. Sweden’s growth was 2.31% where in as the USA was at 1.85%. Quote “ We have grown so fast and done so well because we had high taxes”! Higher taxes that paid to keep their infrastructures laboring in their maintenance and upgrades, Universal Education, Universal Health Care, from birth to grave and Technology’s for their future. All the while, we were riding the bushwhacking roller coaster that ended in a catastrophic crash of biblical proportions. Losses to the tune of $6 Trillion to be paid for by Main Street. Such is the price for admission for the roller coaster ride that advanced our inequality to Main Street. Wall Street.. Oh business as usual…
Texan

Falls Church, VA

#18574 Jun 26, 2013
Oh well; another page of blah blah blah, whatever Barney.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18575 Jun 26, 2013
Truth is might wrote:
<quoted text>
We have to return to being the descendants of those who created America. There was no cowardice there.
LOL you want us to be Pilgrims all over again? Hey about 1773 and we could gather up all the TEA and cast it out unto the waters of oblivion. Oh Yeah that sounds like fun..Hmm wonder who created Satan? Does god turn the other cheek when smitten by Satan? Would that mean he is a coward? Fun to dabble within the deranged minds of bigots.
Ah here we go into the summer of 2013. Liberals are rolling out the barrels for fun and singing on sunshine. Resting in shaded pools of the cool, cool changes evolving. A higher evolution to our politics’ maturity is budding forth once again. In the past decade “We The People” have examined ourselves and found us wanting to step out of the gloom and doom scenarios of the traditionalist conservative views of the past.
Shackles of prejudice are falling to the ground. Mary Jane is now identified with beneficial outcomes. Illegal immigrants are observing a light at the end of the tunnel. Gays are growing in their freedoms to be gay. America is awakening to be once again the land of the diverse melting pot it once was. Rejuvenating strengths that was always their fundamental strengths‘.
Demographics of the ideologies of Jim Crow, John Birch or the hyped up McCarthy are fading into the archaic dust bins of our history. Another dark chapter of our growing pains.“We The People” have reached a majority that choose to distance themselves from the gloom and doom policies that promote these dysfunctional callow ideologies.
51% are now in favor of gays to be gay. 72% agree that this is inevitable. Mary Jane up 11 points from 2010. Previously only less than 1/3 comprehended its beneficial factors. This according to Pew Polls. CBS/N.Y. Times poll have discovered 83% favor a path to citizenship for the illegal immigrants. 20% higher than the 2007 Pew Polls. Which was the last time this issue was addressed.
Business scholar Fariborz Ghadar, from the Center Of Strategic and International Affaires explains what is occurring. Quote “ Whether it’s war on terror or the recession or this or that; Society then reacts to those periods and change results” he goes on to say “The younger generation is getting more accepting, the pace of change is much faster, data is available to us more quickly. We’re more plugged in to the world around us and its combining to allow people to develop their own opinions and be open to others”.
1980’s generation grew up with 911 and the gloom and doom of the past of the bushwhacking days. They are now 18 to 32. Here in lies the moving force for the abrupt change in right wing polarization to left wing polarization.
Similar to the 60’s after the Nam episodes. Social rights sprouted, as it is now with the 80’s generation.
Today we have instant communication and knowledge at our finger tips. Fraudulent propaganda schemes of our past prejudices become exposed. Observe the effect on programs such as “Weeds, Modern Family and Ugly Betty” to name a few. They stimulate diversity and liberalization. Advancing the goals of the broad open minded liberal, as opposed to the narrow close minded conservative. There will continue to be gloomy times. They however are advocating their own demise with each experienced generation that follows. Growing in intellect and controlling, the gloom and doom scenarios. Science will soon render these gloomy days for agricultural benefits. Removing them from authority based organizations. Obama once said “ Each successive generation creates a new space for peace and tolerance and justice and fairness” Right to the point.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18576 Jun 26, 2013
Waco 1909 wrote:
<quoted text> You'd think that after all these centuries people would get a clue. Hate is seductive.
Gee that’s a good point. Think that’s the Tea Parties Slogan. What do you hate? Ho, ho…
CEO’s Inequality
Inequality In The USA. Has the highest level among the advanced industrial countries. Comparing to some such as Hungary, Belgium and France which have no significant increases to their inequality. Where in as the USA has been increasing to be more aligned with Iran, Jamaica, Uganda and the Philippines.
GDP does not take into account the measure of inequality. Does not measure the security of its citizens.
All boats rise equally on the rising tide is no longer applicable here in the USA. We have harbors that restrict through manipulation the rising tides. The few affluent yachts at the open end of the harbor suffer no restrictions of significance, equal to the manipulated incoming tide, to the boats in the restricted harbors. Tide dams have been erected to offset the flow of rising tides within the harbors.
Example; Presently USA CEO’s have 200 to 1 ratio in income to the average laborer. Japan as one example has a 16 to 1 ratio. Less than 50 years ago USA had a 30 to 1 ratio. This rising inequality has stimulated additional wanna-be’s executives to seek the same. One example can be found in the UK. The UK’s “High Pay Commission” reported that their top executives were approaching Victorian levels. Presently though they are at the levels of the 1920’s as measured for inequality in laborers’ productivity distributions of wealth.
Sweden, UK and additionally some of the Scandinavian nations and some within the European Union have taken steps to nip this inequality of distributions. Restricting CEO’s pay to a ratio of corporations earnings and out law golden parachutes. Bonuses and gifts as well. There is a provision that allows for parts or all to be circumnavigated if the voters agree. That is, not the voters of the corporation boards but all citizens voters. Sweden passed it in 2012 the others are putting it up for debate and or vote by their citizens.
USA…. the thundering sound of crickets on the issue.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#18577 Jun 26, 2013
Texan wrote:
Oh well; another page of blah blah blah, whatever Barney.
Ah Texan it was you that brought this thread back to life and inspiring all of us to drink from your well. Having fun. Keep it up… Love Bernie..
Tea baggers are not liberal…. Pirates of Hostage/Ransom leadership. Anarchist. Observe differences in their definitions. You propose we adopt this erroneous ideology? You have a few cards missing in your deck…
lib·er·al [líbb&#601;r&#601;l, líbbr&#601;l]
adj
1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual
3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
My great-aunt was liberal in her bequests.

4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount
a liberal helping

5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation
a liberal interpretation of the rules

6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study
a liberal education

7. of political liberalism: relating to a political ideology of liberalism

n (plural lib·er·als)
liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness

Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

an·ar·chist [ánn&#601;rkist]
(plural an·ar·chists)
n
1. supporter of anarchism: somebody who believes that governments should be abolished as unnecessary
2. lawless person: somebody who tries to overthrow a government or behaves in a lawless way. Defiant

Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Your definition of Tea is false. Simply put to achieve those goals you proposed requires a socialistic ideology to achieve them.
Texan

Falls Church, VA

#18578 Jun 26, 2013
Another half page of blah blah blah, Barney you tend to make folks wish that the next kane would just wash Florida into The Gulf. Blah blah blah.

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18579 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee that’s a good point. Think that’s the Tea Parties Slogan. What do you hate? Ho, ho…
CEO’s Inequality
Inequality In The USA. Has the highest level among the advanced industrial countries. Comparing to some such as Hungary, Belgium and France which have no significant increases to their inequality. Where in as the USA has been increasing to be more aligned with Iran, Jamaica, Uganda and the Philippines.
GDP does not take into account the measure of inequality. Does not measure the security of its citizens.
All boats rise equally on the rising tide is no longer applicable here in the USA. We have harbors that restrict through manipulation the rising tides. The few affluent yachts at the open end of the harbor suffer no restrictions of significance, equal to the manipulated incoming tide, to the boats in the restricted harbors. Tide dams have been erected to offset the flow of rising tides within the harbors.
Example; Presently USA CEO’s have 200 to 1 ratio in income to the average laborer. Japan as one example has a 16 to 1 ratio. Less than 50 years ago USA had a 30 to 1 ratio. This rising inequality has stimulated additional wanna-be’s executives to seek the same. One example can be found in the UK. The UK’s “High Pay Commission” reported that their top executives were approaching Victorian levels. Presently though they are at the levels of the 1920’s as measured for inequality in laborers’ productivity distributions of wealth.
Sweden, UK and additionally some of the Scandinavian nations and some within the European Union have taken steps to nip this inequality of distributions. Restricting CEO’s pay to a ratio of corporations earnings and out law golden parachutes. Bonuses and gifts as well. There is a provision that allows for parts or all to be circumnavigated if the voters agree. That is, not the voters of the corporation boards but all citizens voters. Sweden passed it in 2012 the others are putting it up for debate and or vote by their citizens.
USA…. the thundering sound of crickets on the issue.
USA seems to disappoint you old boy. Well, I heartily extend you a"Welcome To The Club" my fine liberal friend.
justasayin

Lenoir, NC

#18580 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
HA, ha you can be so funny. Thought you were savvy enough to know the Governor of AZ. Back into the chasm you go..
Time to paint ourselves as the Indians of 1773 and run down to the voting booths this 2014 and cast out the Tea. Out unto the waters of political oblivion. Republicans od sound mind and integrity will help us in that endeavor.
Senator Susan Collins {R Traditionalist} of Main,“finds it baffling that it’s a small minority of our caucus, that is holding up going to conference, when our party for years, has argued that we need to have a budget. Without a House conference we can’t possibly complete action on it.”
Senator Marco Rubio {R Tea Party} of Florida argues that we should continue to support the ideology that ONE Senator can have the power to hold the USA Hostage and Ransom it off to what that Senator desires.
Democrats counter with the need of raising the debt ceiling to cover the cost of the Congresses’ expenditures. Republicans inability to produce a bill for a budget, mandates this process of hand to mouth budgeting scenarios. Ideologies of the Tea Party pirates lurking in the shadows .“Our Way Or The Highway reverberating through our Congressional Sacred Hallways.
Damn, I don't know who Gabby Giffords or John McCain or Sandra Day O'Connor or William Rehnquist or Barry Goldwater or Janet Napolitano oh wait they are from......

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18581 Jun 26, 2013
What do I hate Bernard? The attrition of freedom in America. The ever increasing number of laws that inundate the citizens of this land. The illegality of marijuana. The huge amount of my fellow citizens who are imprisoned. The fact that organic food costs a fortune. The fact that we breed lawyers like cockroaches but have a shortage of doctors. The fact that no matter how mundane the felony, we disenfranchise the felons from their ability to vote, and brand them for life. So tell me Bernard. Do I sound like a liberal, a conservative... Or a human being? You seem to have all the ready answers.
justasayin

Lenoir, NC

#18582 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah Texan it was you that brought this thread back to life and inspiring all of us to drink from your well. Having fun. Keep it up… Love Bernie..
Tea baggers are not liberal…. Pirates of Hostage/Ransom leadership. Anarchist. Observe differences in their definitions. You propose we adopt this erroneous ideology? You have a few cards missing in your deck…
lib·er·al [líbb&#601;r&#601;l, líbbr&#601;l]
adj
1. broad-minded: tolerant of different views and standards of behavior in others
2. progressive politically or socially: favoring gradual reform, especially political reforms that extend democracy, distribute wealth more evenly, and protect the personal freedom of the individual
3. generous: freely giving money, time, or some other asset
My great-aunt was liberal in her bequests.
4. generous in quantity: large in size or amount
a liberal helping
5. not literal: not limited to the literal meaning in translation or interpretation
a liberal interpretation of the rules
6. culturally oriented: concerned with general cultural matters and broadening of the mind rather than professional or technical study
a liberal education
7. of political liberalism: relating to a political ideology of liberalism
n (plural lib·er·als)
liberal person: somebody who favors tolerance or open-mindedness
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
an·ar·chist [ánn&#601;rkist]
(plural an·ar·chists)
n
1. supporter of anarchism: somebody who believes that governments should be abolished as unnecessary
2. lawless person: somebody who tries to overthrow a government or behaves in a lawless way. Defiant
Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Your definition of Tea is false. Simply put to achieve those goals you proposed requires a socialistic ideology to achieve them.
"Definition of LIBERAL
1
a : of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts <liberal education>
b archaic : of or befitting a man of free birth
2
a : marked by generosity : openhanded <a liberal giver>
b : given or provided in a generous and openhanded way <a liberal meal>
c : ample, full
3
obsolete : lacking moral restraint : licentious
4
: not literal or strict : loose <a liberal translation>
5
: broad-minded; especially : not bound by authoritarianism, orthodoxy, or traditional forms
6
a : of, favoring, or based upon the principles of liberalism
b capitalized : of or constituting a political party advocating or associated with the principles of political liberalism; especially : of or constituting a political party in the United Kingdom associated with ideals of individual especially economic freedom, greater individual participation in government, and constitutional, political, and administrative reforms designed to secure these objectives
— lib·er·al·ly adverb
— lib·er·al·ness noun" I especially like #3 it must be true it's on the internet.

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18583 Jun 26, 2013
Bernard has already bragged about having sex with a woman, he bragged about it on Topix. So... That makes him licentious! I always thought only kids bragged about sex! Seriously though, I thought the guy was bombed out of his gourd when he did that! How about it Bernard? Were you loaded??

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18584 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
So "debunk" the fact that our troops are considered possible terrorists by Janet Napalitano and Barry Soetoro. "Debunk" the fact that our troops are
under scrutiny for anti-Obama thoughts. The answer is that you can't.
Sounds like the actions of a very paranoid bunch of criminals that run our government, but you should know that, you worthless O-bot.
I'll try this again:

Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
wtf

De Leon, TX

#18585 Jun 26, 2013
So What wrote:
Why you Dumbocrats even bother to show up is beyond me...
why do we have pepole in co. county thinking their republicans theres not enough money in comanche county for anyone to be republican. your dumb if you think that party cares for us.
Defiant1

Deer Park, TX

#18586 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try this again:
Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
If you really want reliable info on Big Sis and the Dept. Of Homeland Stupidity, you can Google it your own damn self and find lots of sources. Same with the "special" treatment of our troops who don't like Obama.

I bet you probably need someone to wipe your lazy a$$ for you, you stupid drone. You also don't like the truth about your masters so
why should I waste my time on a fool like you?.

“physics is your friend”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18587 Jun 26, 2013
ActuaIIy wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll try this again:
Boy, when you can provide even one legitimate source that can disprove any of the fact I present then you might have some credibility. Until then keep wallowing in the land of "did not"
Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/city/paris-tx/TQGE...
I got a friend who can enlighten you. Wait a few minutes,
justasayin

Lenoir, NC

#18588 Jun 26, 2013
By Mary Kate Cary, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

In February, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano testified before Congress, and according to news accounts at the time, she purposely did not use the word "terrorism" at all, especially regarding any attacks against the United States by militant Islamic extremists. At the time, the Associated Press reported that she was the first chief of Homeland Security to drop the word "terror" from remarks to Congress.

So it was a surprise yesterday when the Huffington Post published an unclassified report that Napolitano sent to local law enforcement officials around the United States, warning them that "the return of military veterans facing significant challenges reintegrating into their communities could lead to the potential emergence of terrorist groups or lone wolf extremists capable of carrying out violent attacks." Other parts of the report mention veterans as potential recruits to terrorist cells as well. This is the thanks they get from a grateful nation? Apparently not.

Secretary Napolitano wouldn't use the word "terrorists" to describe extremists who carried out the 9/11 attacks, but she did use it to describe returning American soldiers who have kept us all safe from terrorism. Yesterday, the head of the American Legion wrote her a letter asking for an apology on behalf of all those serving our country. She went on the morning shows this morning and downplayed the whole thing as "Washington spin." On MSNBC this morning, she agreed to take only one question on the controversy and said everyone should "take a deep breath," a phrase which always makes me feel like the person saying it thinks the rest of us are a bunch of two-year-olds. Her response came across as condescending, and she seemed annoyed at the question.

If you read the whole report, you'll see that it's full of speculation and "potential" rather than actual threats. One thought struck me while I was reading it: Why was this unclassified in the first place? It was a mistake to put this report out to local law enforcement, where it was sure to get leaked to the press. But it was an even bigger mistake to write it at all. Our vets deserve better.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#18589 Jun 26, 2013
Defiant1 wrote:
<quoted text>
If you really want reliable info on Big Sis and the Dept. Of Homeland Stupidity, you can Google it your own damn self and find lots of sources. Same with the "special" treatment of our troops who don't like Obama.
I bet you probably need someone to wipe your lazy a$$ for you, you stupid drone. You also don't like the truth about your masters so
why should I waste my time on a fool like you?.
If you had anything FACTUAL you would post it here instead of crying "look it up yourself" boy. You know you have NOTHING that's why you are reluctant to post anything to back you up.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Aubrey Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Dec 17 98 Degree Diarrhea 595
Who do you support for State Board of Education... (Oct '10) Nov 29 Fartology 752
Need Assistance Nov '14 Truth is might 2
Unfinished Home on N. Custer Road between ManeG... (Jun '14) Nov '14 Cher Hukill 2
women (Feb '09) Oct '14 Mr Patel 3
looking to relocate. looking for rent house Oct '14 Educated 3
MEGATEL Salesperson ARRESTED Paloma Creek Sep '14 marci 3

Aubrey News Video

Aubrey Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Aubrey People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Aubrey News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Aubrey

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:16 pm PST

NBC Sports 3:16PM
DeMarco Murray is determined to play
NBC Sports 4:14 PM
Ryan Mallett wants to be the Texans' QB next season
NFL11:56 AM
DeMarco Murray plans to play for Cowboys vs. Colts
Bleacher Report11:56 AM
Eagles vs. Redskins: Live Score and Analysis for Philadelphia
Yahoo! Sports 5:54 PM
Eagles playoff hopes suffer with loss to Redskins