Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
gored moniker thingy

Cordele, GA

#27680 Oct 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, the ONLY party that will help stop(postpone???) what you posted is the conservative party. I know you know this, but Obama is about to push amnesty AGAIN. Get ready.
"conservative party", huh- Where do you vote? I didn't see a conservative party on my ballot.
stelio kontos

Columbus, GA

#27681 Oct 17, 2013
I find your lack of intelligence disturbing. See y'all in the funny papers. Oh wait, you are already there. Nighty night folks. Try to be as destructive toward each other with your comments. Oh wait, again, stupid me, you already do. Sleep tight. David is now 10-8.
gored moniker thingy

Cordele, GA

#27682 Oct 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
No, no, no. I didn't mean to sound as if I were going off on you. I did ask and you did respectfully answer. I was just trying to point out the other side needs some work, too. If the Republicans loosen up on abortion and marijuana, that would make them Democrats and then we're back to one party. Does that make sense? I am trying to determine how this country is ever going to heal itself from all of this. It concerns me.
No it doesn't really make any sense to me. Just who in the hell decided that a democracy (or republic, Dave) must have two or more widely divergent parties in order to operate. Just look at the CURRENT republican party, for example, you could divide it up into three separate groups that have little more in common with each other than they do with democrats. I submit that there is actually more danger in political diversity than there is in political commonality.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27683 Oct 17, 2013
OMTE wrote:
<quoted text>I disagree, most conservatives are lame and alot of them only want to conserve their money.(IMO):( "Conservatives" helped bless us with that demon Bush jr. I think we need a true Libertarian, like Rand Paul, to restore our nation's greatness. But that's just me. ;)
I can't disagree in regard to the lameness of the conservatives. My point was that LIBERALS certainly won't help. They are in favor of it.
Yes. I am looking at Rand Paul, too. I will have to hear all of the conservative candidates and weigh their chances.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27684 Oct 17, 2013
Laughing at U wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill has no soul or humanity, he won't crushed by anything.
Nah. He just talks smack on here like everyone else. In real life, he really IS a very nice, respectable guy. I know he has ticked you all off. I'm not quite sure what he did, but obviously he did. Under different circumstances, you would probably like him. Just curious....what exacly did he do? Is it the "clueless and uneducated....." ? We're all pretty guilty of smackdowns.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27685 Oct 17, 2013
just sayin wrote:
<quoted text>Why should he tell the truth, there is little chance he'll ever be held accountable in this life anyway. Jobless claims are up, but one must be unemployed continually for two weeks before being eligible and the numbers are from last week. The cheerleaders for everything Obama will never tell that part of the story.
Another fallacy that I'm sure you've already covered, is the threat of default on our debt. Can't happen unless the president does it intentionally. It is illegal, not that this president respects the law as he has proven.
It's amazing, isn't it? He will ALWAYS be protected. Too many people are wanting this social experiment to succeed. If the truth were to ever be told, this administration is a colossal failure. He'll NEVER take nor be given the blame. No matter what. Will NEVER happen. The disappointing thing is that so many people(Democrats) are fine with his chaos and for some reason think that when everything shakes out, they won't be affected. Can't quite determine how they are coming to that conclusion, but that's how they roll.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27686 Oct 17, 2013
that poing wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong big man!! I desperately want them to compromise for the common good. People sit down and talk, one side gives a little and the other side gives a little and over time we are where we should be. What we have now are a few loudmouths who think compromise is getting their way. If you are honest with yourself and look at the facts Obama gave a little, but the other side wanted it all their way, and it cost them, as it should. Compromise was built into our democracy and was the way government operated before the Tea Party conservatives. As soon as they found out they don't have the votes to get what they want, they blackmail the American people. We need to put them all in a room, both sides, all of them. Not let the press know what's going on and not let them see the light of day until a majority agree on a commons sense compromise. That's NOT what the Tea Party wants, Obama invited all the House representatives to a meeting, only a few showed up. This is what we get from the Tea Party year after year. It will go on until they make the public so mad they don't matter anymore.
I think we are at that point.
Obama: "I won't compromise" "I shouldn't have to give anything".
Now, how do you get that Obama gave a little? He acted his typical petulant shameless childish self.
If you don't call THAT having it ALL his way, then you have a problem. It is very clear. Why can you NOT understand that? That is the way he has "lead"(although he is NO leader) the entire time. He REFUSES to reach across the aisle. Other presidents have but that is beneath the high and mighty Obama. HE IS THE KING. Obama could have avoided this whole thing. If you don't know that, you are as blind as the rest of the liberals. I don't blame any of them for not wanting to cooperate with that ruthless spawn of the devil. This country will remain in chaos as long as Obama is in office. I think we'll see a lot of difference, regardless of who is president, as soon as he is GONE. I know I'll be happy to not have to look at his lying, conniving, petty, freedom destroying, petulant, spoiled face EVER again.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27687 Oct 17, 2013
that poing wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong big man!! I desperately want them to compromise for the common good. People sit down and talk, one side gives a little and the other side gives a little and over time we are where we should be. What we have now are a few loudmouths who think compromise is getting their way. If you are honest with yourself and look at the facts Obama gave a little, but the other side wanted it all their way, and it cost them, as it should. Compromise was built into our democracy and was the way government operated before the Tea Party conservatives. As soon as they found out they don't have the votes to get what they want, they blackmail the American people. We need to put them all in a room, both sides, all of them. Not let the press know what's going on and not let them see the light of day until a majority agree on a commons sense compromise. That's NOT what the Tea Party wants, Obama invited all the House representatives to a meeting, only a few showed up. This is what we get from the Tea Party year after year. It will go on until they make the public so mad they don't matter anymore.
I think we are at that point.
And as far as that clown inviting all of the House for his little meeting. That was nothing more than a publicity stunt and it's like slapping someone across the face and then turning around and expecting that same person to be your buddy. He had already made his stance perfectly clear. WHAT A TOOL.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27688 Oct 17, 2013
just sayin wrote:
I wonder what's next for the crisis maker in chief.
He'll need to come up with something to keep that debacle Obamacare off the front page. He'll land on his feet. He has a lot of protection.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27689 Oct 17, 2013
whom wrote:
<quoted text>
A nice little fairy tale for a bad little boy in south georgia.....
do you reckon he went to sleep....
Naaaaaah.'Ole LewHolt is still around. I KNOW this to be true. He's okay. It's just politics.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27690 Oct 17, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
They had a choice between Bush or Kerry. What do you think?
I know, right???? AND the libs HATE people with loads of money, however, they voted for Kerry!!!!!! Kerry represents EXACTLY what they supposedly HATE. Ever heard of Heinz????? lol Makes no sense. Not surprised.
Laughing at U

Blairsville, GA

#27691 Oct 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah. He just talks smack on here like everyone else. In real life, he really IS a very nice, respectable guy. I know he has ticked you all off. I'm not quite sure what he did, but obviously he did. Under different circumstances, you would probably like him. Just curious....what exacly did he do? Is it the "clueless and uneducated....." ? We're all pretty guilty of smackdowns.
He has never smacked me down. Neither have you. He is simply cold and calculating. No amount of "smack talk" as you say can hide it. That is why he is the most hated man on Topix.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27692 Oct 17, 2013
Bigdave1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh come on. You know down deep inside that you would never vote for Kerry. A Vietnam vet that threw his medals over the White House fence while protesting against the war. You know he is a diehard liberal and always has been. Choice of two evils, which one? Come on dude I think I know you better than that. You do know that you didn't have to vote at all.
PLUS Kerry is RICH! Well, his WIFE is rich. Kerry married well. At any rate, the liberals HATE wealth. Oh, wait. I guess it's OKAY for a libroid to be rich. My bad.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27693 Oct 17, 2013
gored moniker thingy wrote:
<quoted text>I am sure that it is a great story, syn. But I only made through the first two sentences before I realized that I am really pressed for time- hope that you don't mind too terribly if I wait until it comes out in paperback- as I am certain that is forthcoming!
Well, that's okay. You don't know LewHolt. I you did, it would be nostalgic. Yep! A trip down memory lane.
gored moniker thingy

Cordele, GA

#27694 Oct 17, 2013
whom wrote:
<quoted text>
A nice little fairy tale for a bad little boy in south georgia.....
do you reckon he went to sleep....
....maybe you should try to be a little more specific about the south Georgia boys- I think that at last count there were at least three. OMTE (the whiz kid), silver foxx (the cotton scout), and me (the country bumpkin).

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27695 Oct 17, 2013
gored moniker thingy wrote:
<quoted text>"conservative party", huh- Where do you vote? I didn't see a conservative party on my ballot.
Look it up.
gored moniker thingy

Cordele, GA

#27696 Oct 17, 2013
Synergy wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, that's okay. You don't know LewHolt. I you did, it would be nostalgic. Yep! A trip down memory lane.
LewHolt- yeah, he coached football at Notre Dame, right. But I think you misspelled- it is Lou Holtz.

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27697 Oct 17, 2013
gored moniker thingy wrote:
<quoted text>"conservative party", huh- Where do you vote? I didn't see a conservative party on my ballot.
So, you think a liberal party will help stop the illegals? Seriously???? Ummmmm......NO!
gored moniker thingy

Cordele, GA

#27698 Oct 17, 2013
love my baby- and my miley

“Liberals are closet raaacists!”

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#27699 Oct 17, 2013
gored moniker thingy wrote:
<quoted text>No it doesn't really make any sense to me. Just who in the hell decided that a democracy (or republic, Dave) must have two or more widely divergent parties in order to operate. Just look at the CURRENT republican party, for example, you could divide it up into three separate groups that have little more in common with each other than they do with democrats. I submit that there is actually more danger in political diversity than there is in political commonality.
The kind of political chaos we have now is insane. I've not witnessed anything like this before. In a normal situation, the parties seem to at least work together on SOME issues. This administration is irretrievably broken. I don't think I have to tell you whom I blame for it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Athens Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Man flees from Oconee police during traffic stop (Jan '16) Jun 28 Papa john 3
Dos any one know where kara mo (Nov '16) Jun 28 Papa john 2
News Photos: Cyclists ride the proposed Firefly Trail Apr '17 Kanada 1
Nightmares Mar '17 Krae12203 1
UGA Law First Annual 5k Mar '17 IPleadThe5k 1
Amazon censoring books for Israel Mar '17 Jim Fetzer 2
Remove all health care subsidies for Congress ... Mar '17 wjabbe 3

Athens Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Athens Mortgages