Comments
|
Assemblyman O'Mara should be praised.. why did PA Assembly woman Tina Pickett and Assemblyman Matt Baker write me and say that they would not introduce such a law as Assemblyman O'Mara did? Could it be that Tina Pickett was afraid of ruffling the feathers of the father ..of Andrew Zeller.. Gerard Zeller who may run against her. I have sent this info to Senator Gene Yaw who seems receptive..to the concept. Others have offered to co sponsor such a bill in the PA Senate and Assembly. But it is disgusting how Tina hid in a hole on this issue. You can just search Youtube.com search Steven's Law.. A02180 Summary: BILL NO A02180 SAME AS No same as SPONSOR O'Mara COSPNSR MLTSPNSR Amd S600, V & T L Enacts "Steven's Law"; requires passengers of motor vehicles involved in personal injury accidents to report such accident when the operator of such motor vehicle does not stop or provide information to the injured party. A02180 Actions: BILL NO A02180 01/15/2009 referred to transportation A02180 Votes: A02180 Memo: BILL NUMBER: A2180 TITLE OF BILL : An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to enacting "Steven's Law" to require the reporting of personal injury motor vehicle accidents by passengers PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL : To require a passenger of a motor vehicle involved in a personal injury accident to report the accident when he or she knows the operator of the motor vehicle did not stop and provide information to either the injured party and/or to a police officer. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS : Section 1 amends section 600 of the vehicle and traffic law to add a new subdivision 3 that provides that a passenger, knowing or having cause to know that personal injury has been caused to another person due to an incident involving the motor vehicle of which they are a passenger, and where the operator of said vehicle has not stopped an provided information to the injured party and/or a police officer, the passenger shall report the incident as soon as physically able to the nearest police station or judicial officer. Failure to do so shall constitute a class B misdemeanor and is punishable by a fine of not less than $250 or more than $500 in addition to any other penalties provided by law. Section 2 provides that this act shall take effect on the first of November after the date on which it shall have become law. JUSTIFICATION : On March 22, 2007, 17-year old Steven Bacon was the victim of a hit-and-run accident in the town of Ashland. His body wasn't discovered until the next day. The driver of the vehicle turned himself into police the next day but only after the driver of another vehicle - a friend of the driver - who witnessed the incident, insisted that he turn himself in. Also in the vehicle that killed Steven Bacon was a passenger who was also a witness to the incident. Although no one can know for certain whether Steven Bacon would've survived his injuries had his body been discovered sooner, there is no doubt that there were people with knowledge that something horrible had happened that night whose failure to come forward resulted in Steven Bacon's body laying in the culvert on the shoulder of the road for well over 12 hours. The driver was charged, in addition to manslaughter in the second degree, with leaving the scene of a personal injury accident in violation of vehicle and traffic law section 600(2). However, his passenger was under no legal obligation to report the accident even though he was fully aware that a body flew over the car in which he was riding, and also aware that the driver neither stopped nor reported the incident. This legislation creates that legal obligation for a passenger of a vehicle to report the incident if the driver does not. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY : 2008: referred to transportation FISCAL IMPLICATIONS : None EFFECTIVE DATE : The first of November after the date on which it shall have become law. |
||||
|
it was needed long time ago , not just because my brother got killed
|
||||
|
You mean PA imposes no legal duty on witnesses to immediately report crimes they witness, nor to report seriously injured citizens they happen across?
Surely it is a crime for a Pennsylvanian witness to choose not to report a murder, a beating, a theft. Why is choosing not to report an automobile accident involving a vehicle you happen to be traveling in, and the serious injuries to your fellow citizen laying roadside a special case? And why would Omara propose such a limited-scope crime, and with such a low crime and punishment classification? I am sure Pennsylvanians would accept that any legal duty to report crimes they put upon themselves should apply to all witnesses of all crimes in all situations--save spousal relationships, perhaps. I suspect Pennsylvanians would also accept that the consequences to a witness who does not comply be severe. Why are your representatives so timid? Take a poll of their constituents' feelings on the matter for them, and show them. The vehicle's passengers who chose to not report the injuries to Steven as soon as possible should have been subject to harsh criminal liability. A Class B Misdemeanor is not going to factor into my decision making process when I, as a witnessing passenger, debate whether to immediately report Steven's injuries when those injuries were caused by the questionable driving of my slightly drunk friend, boss, or family member. Changing the behavior of witnesses at the point in time it matters is the goal, here, correct? My decision not to immediately report Steven's injury could reasonably and foreseeably result in his bleeding to death. That is what we want to prevent. The decision to act must be immediate. The penalty for my decision to forsake the physical life of Steven (replace "Steven" with the name of one of your loved-ones) in favor of a chance to avoid some undesired consequence to my slightly intoxicated good buddy and boss, the driver, should be commensurate with the reasonably foreseeable consequences of my decision. People die from mild concussions. Being struck by an automobile is clearly a presumably life-threatening event. The decision of a competent witness to not immediately report such things should expose them to maximum penalties that are severe. Let the courts decide how severe, case by case. The liklihood I will report Steven's injuries ASAP grows the greater the penalty for me not doing so becomes. This applies the more loathsome a character I am, as well. If I will not report Steven's injuries for common, humanitarian reasons, I may still care about risking many years in prison for a driver who only might benefit from my inaction, and silence. With a substantial penalty on the line, I would find no trouble rejecting the driver's argument that we just wait for complete sobriety before reporting the accident. Waiting takes me from a state of utter blamelessness to one of serious jeopardy just like that. |
||||
|
||||
Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
| Topic | Updated | Last By | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Police Anchor Camp (Mar '06) | Dec 23 | joe | 71 |
| Wlasiuk retrial delayed after family car crash (Sep '08) | Dec 23 | bearhunter1744 | 9 |
| Home Invasion in Cortland | Dec 21 | marble road | 2 |
| North Country man pleads guilty in fatal DWI crash | Dec 14 | jack | 1 |
| Challenger appears District 6 winner | Dec 11 | Not yet | 9 |
| Review: Enlightened Dentistry - Ramon D Casipit... | Dec 9 | annon | 1 |
| Lewis legislators back 'rooftop highway' | Nov '09 | ColBeach | 2 |