PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail

[Tink]

http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/New...

<snip>According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.

article at link

[Clyde Nocar]

For a billionaire like her royal pelosiness a 15k here or there is less thsn pocket change.

[Lori Von Vamp]

Tink wrote:

http://republicans.waysandmean s.house.gov/News/DocumentSingl e.aspx?DocumentID=153583
<snip>According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.
article at link

Waaahhhh. Mith Pewozi ith twyin' to put me in da jail! Waaaahhhh!

[Tink]

Lori Von Vamp wrote:

<quoted text>
Waaahhhh. Mith Pewozi ith twyin' to put me in da jail! Waaaahhhh!

Make fun, but I doubt if many people here can swallow 15,000 a year for mandatory government insurance. I'm thinking not all those who voted for obama were expecting this.

[Zonga]

Tink wrote:

http://republicans.waysandmean s.house.gov/News/DocumentSingl e.aspx?DocumentID=153583
<snip>According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.
article at link

Well, yea, OK.

But you know, by 2016 a loaf of bread is going to cost $69.95.

[Alberto Gonzo]

Clyde Nocar wrote:

For a billionaire like her royal pelosiness a 15k here or there is less thsn pocket change.

As usual you leave out the details! The amount is 2.5 percent of taxable income, so, the $15,000 price would be for someone who ends up with an aftertax income of $600,000! Hmmmm, think they could afford $15K for health insurance. If you make $50K after tax, 2.5 percent would be $1,250.00 or about $100 per month, sure beats the $450 Blue Cross wanted for my daughter's healthcare 8 years ago! Floridiots are sooooooooo stupid. Why are you spreading Drudge propaganda, did Limbaugh or Beck tell you to do it?

[village Idiot]

Alberto Gonzo wrote:

<quoted text>As usual you leave out the details! The amount is 2.5 percent of taxable income, so, the $15,000 price would be for someone who ends up with an aftertax income of $600,000! Hmmmm, think they could afford $15K for health insurance. If you make $50K after tax, 2.5 percent would be $1,250.00 or about $100 per month, sure beats the $450 Blue Cross wanted for my daughter's healthcare 8 years ago! Floridiots are sooooooooo stupid. Why are you spreading Drudge propaganda, did Limbaugh or Beck tell you to do it?

Why? Some people can't be bothered with facts. They prefer to let emotional paroxysms overrule their limited intellect.

[CJB]

Two cities, Baltimore and San Francisco, are not missing their idiot!!

For Halloween, I should have dressed up like Nancy Pelosi. If that would not scare the kiddies, I do not know what would!! That b**** gives me nightmares!!

[Quackery gone wild]

How much does it currently cost to incacerate an individual ?

Wasn't the concept of debtor's prison deemed unlawful back in the dark ages ?

[CJB]

Man, Obama aight!! I just got one complaint.

How am I supposed to pay 15,000 a year fo health insurance when all I be doin is making Happy Meals at Mac Donald's once a week?

The bank done repoed my Caddy last week and now this?

[CJB]

Quackery gone wild wrote:

How much does it currently cost to incacerate an individual ?
Wasn't the concept of debtor's prison deemed unlawful back in the dark ages ?

Yep, now instead of paying for people's occasional hospital visits, we will be paying for their shelter and meals while they be chillin' in the Grey Bar Mo-tel!!

You gotta love how they are so concerned with poor folk.

[Buncy]

Quackery gone wild wrote:

How much does it currently cost to incacerate an individual ?
Wasn't the concept of debtor's prison deemed unlawful back in the dark ages ?

The Brits had debtors' prisons in the 19th century. Dickens described them in his novels,_The Pickwick Papers_ and _Bleak House,_ and brought the whole British Empire to shame. Matter of fact the prisons were abandoned in large part because of Charles Dickens.

[Tink]

village Idiot wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? Some people can't be bothered with facts. They prefer to let emotional paroxysms overrule their limited intellect.

Is that you trolling jessica?

Can't say that I understand the actual figures of who will pay what. I'm more concerned that we will be REQUIRED to buy this and if not face JAIL. That is my big issue.That you have no problem with our government requiring us to buy something from them or go to jail is remarkable. I bet if homosexuals were required to participate in a behavior modification program or go to jail you might feel a little different about giving our government such control over our freedoms.

[Tink]

Here's some different figures as to who will pay what...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274...
<snip>On Nov. 2, the Congressional Budget Office estimated what the plans will likely cost. An individual earning $44,000 before taxes who purchases his own insurance will have to pay a $5,300 premium and an estimated $2,000 in out-of-pocket expenses, for a total of $7,300 a year, which is 17% of his pre-tax income. A family earning $102,100 a year before taxes will have to pay a $15,000 premium plus an estimated $5,300 out-of-pocket, for a $20,300 total, or 20% of its pre-tax income. Individuals and families earning less than these amounts will be eligible for subsidies paid directly to their insurer.

theres more at the link....lots more that people should be educated about.

[Buncy]

Tink wrote:

<quoted text>
Is that you trolling jessica?
Can't say that I understand the actual figures of who will pay what. I'm more concerned that we will be REQUIRED to buy this and if not face JAIL. That is my big issue.That you have no problem with our government requiring us to buy something from them or go to jail is remarkable. I bet if homosexuals were required to participate in a behavior modification program or go to jail you might feel a little different about giving our government such control over our freedoms.

The more you post the crazier you get. You remind me of that flake in Columbia -rttl- who got all wet and runny over some highschool student in Jackson, MI who was "in danger" of being criticized for writing an article badmouthing Michele Obama. LOL!

Y'all insane.

[Buncy]

Tink wrote:

Here's some different figures as to who will pay what...
http://online.>>>> >>wsj<<<< <<<.com/article/SB100 014240527487047956045745196710 55918380.html

Bwwaaahhhaaaa. Disinfo from Rupert Murdick.

[Tink]

Buncy wrote:

<quoted text>
The more you post the crazier you get. You remind me of that flake in Columbia -rttl- who got all wet and runny over some highschool student in Jackson, MI who was "in danger" of being criticized for writing an article badmouthing Michele Obama. LOL!
Y'all insane.

Comming from the poster with multiple personalities disorder. lol

[Tink]

Buncy wrote:

<quoted text>
Bwwaaahhhaaaa. Disinfo from Rupert Murdick.

They've laid it out where as you just scoff at it. Think I'll go with the ones who cite where their info comes from. Unless you can post information to back up your claims of this being disinfo...?

[the big pill]

Tink wrote:

<quoted text>
Make fun, but I doubt if many people here can swallow 15,000 a year for mandatory government insurance. I'm thinking not all those who voted for obama were expecting this.

They can’t afford it and that’s where the ruse comes into effect. They will be “subsidized” by the taxpayer dollars. We will pay for both their care and their insurance.

The 2,000 page Pelosi turd will be the end of the Democrats for another 20 years.

[mike50]

Quackery gone wild wrote:

How much does it currently cost to incacerate an individual ?
Wasn't the concept of debtor's prison deemed unlawful back in the dark ages ?

Nancy's "brilliant" plan is most likely not constitutional anyway. Nancy, one again, shows her arrogance, disdain for the people, and a lack of any idea of how most Americans lives their lives. This woman is an embarassment.