Only evolutionists think they are apes and can't see they are a furless primate, that is an obligate biped, with the ability to draw on many traits to make meaning of the world and are the only species having this discussion.<quoted text>You are doging, and I asked first. You tell me where apes crossed the line from non-human to human, and what changed that caused the difference, and I'll answer everyone of your questions. Make certain that I won't go off running your rabbits because you are unable to defend you claims!! Now....go ahead and display your weakness by your inability to again being unable to define the difference between a non-human and a human. What evolved to cause this change in labeling?
I wonder if any evolutionist would like to claim some other species is having much the same conversation about the universe and the meaning of it.