US school shooting revives gun debate

[Cathouse Mouse]

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/19/natio...

hahaha

... sorry, but that's just funny.

[The Infantile left Winged]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

http://articles.latimes.com/20 13/jan/19/nation/la-na-nn-gun- appreciation-day-five-injured- at-three-different-gun-shows-2 0130119
hahaha
... sorry, but that's just funny.

Of course it is funny to the hate filled left!

And just how funny is this? outhouse mouse.
==========
And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.

To gun rights advocates, the city provides stark evidence that even some of the toughest restrictions fail to make places safer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/us/strict-c...

[Respect71]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it is funny to the hate filled left!
And just how funny is this? outhouse mouse.
==========
And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.
To gun rights advocates, the city provides stark evidence that even some of the toughest restrictions fail to make places safer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/us/strict-c...

The problem is they believe they can legislate morality. Heaven forbid they should invest their time into a troubled teen or young person... Let the government do it. Lazy

[Cathouse Mouse]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course it is funny to the hate filled left!
And just how funny is this? outhouse mouse.
==========
And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.
To gun rights advocates, the city provides stark evidence that even some of the toughest restrictions fail to make places safer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/30/us/strict-c...

Sorry if you failed in seeing the humor in that. "Repsonsible" gun owners shooting themselves and other "responsible" gun owners in their vicinity just boils over with humorous irony if you ask me. It made me chuckle while reflecting on the Dick Cheney hunting trip accident.

Sometimes, it just becomes too much to not laugh.

[just another guy]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry if you failed in seeing the humor in that. "Repsonsible" gun owners shooting themselves and other "responsible" gun owners in their vicinity just boils over with humorous irony if you ask me. It made me chuckle while reflecting on the Dick Cheney hunting trip accident.
Sometimes, it just becomes too much to not laugh.

Accidents where people are injured are just a riot. I bet you lyao at car wrecks. Train wrecks must have you wetting your panties.

[Cathouse Mouse]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Accidents where people are injured are just a riot. I bet you lyao at car wrecks. Train wrecks must have you wetting your panties.

Well ..... to put it in perspective. "Repsonsible" gun owners shooting themselves in the hand at a gun show is not too unlike .....

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Wouldn't you agree?

[Wall Street Government]

The Infantile left Winged wrote:

<quoted text>
So it is just fine now that oblamer has extended it.
And lemming... how do you feel about this?
And why aren't you crying and screaming about this?
Is it because it is oblamer???
==========
President Obama Signs Indefinite Detention Into Law.
President Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) today, allowing indefinite detention to be codified into law.
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/pr...

"So it is just fine now that oblamer has extended it".

Teabaggers would like to think so.

Unlike them, some DO NOT walk in lockstep with their party.

Didn't like it then, wasn't happy that Obama extended ANY part of it.

[Respect71]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

<quoted text>
Well ..... to put it in perspective. "Repsonsible" gun owners shooting themselves in the hand at a gun show is not too unlike .....
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Wouldn't you agree?

At least the gun owner takes the responsibility and doesn’t blame the gun, and it’s better than a free American giving his rights away to government and then asking said government to do the same from all Americans because of fear.

You video reminds me more of you and your liberal leadership running into the Constitution… That makes your video even more hilarious.

[Respect71]

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Really?!

[just another guy]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
At least the gun owner takes the responsibility and doesn’t blame the gun, and it’s better than a free American giving his rights away to government and then asking said government to do the same from all Americans because of fear.
You video reminds me more of you and your liberal leadership running into the Constitution… That makes your video even more hilarious.

The lunatic left are despicable. They use "the children" to push everything they do. The same children their bs saddles with tons of debt and growing by the minute. Those that they don't murder first, that is.

[Cathouse Mouse]

New Ted Nugent video.

Taliban Ted faces off with Feds;

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

.

.

.

yep.

[just another guy]

Cathouse Mouse wrote:

New Ted Nugent video.
Taliban Ted faces off with Feds;
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
.
.
.
yep.

More like a lunatic leftist seeing a gun.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep they are afraid. That is why 60% of permits are now issued to women.

No, you stupid JAGGOFF.

The higher percentage of permits issued to women reflect the shrinking poll of males with tiny-dicks like yourself apply for permits.

Of course, the CCW doesn't help them a bit in the house where there fat husband is going to shoot them like your bladerunner pal.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

And once again the Constitution is not subject to the most recent poll.

One of these days you should try reading it.

Find someone who passed high school to help you out on the big words and to poke you as you nod off... since it seems you can't make it to the end of a sentence that has more than two dozen words in it.

[Respect71]

barefoot2626 wrote:

<quoted text>
One of these days you should try reading it.
Find someone who passed high school to help you out on the big words and to poke you as you nod off... since it seems you can't make it to the end of a sentence that has more than two dozen words in it.

And your back with you small immature insults and you lack of understanding of our Constitution…

You and Salazar should find a “safe zone” and go have tea. Perfect company I’d say.

[just another guy]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
And your back with you small immature insults and you lack of understanding of our Constitution…
You and Salazar should find a “safe zone” and go have tea. Perfect company I’d say.

They are scared little mice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Looks like barefool broke out of it's cage again.

[Respect71]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
They are scared little mice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Looks like barefool broke out of it's cage again.

Great video! Really illustrates the fears of liberal leaders! That city needs to be proud that their city Attorney and his recognition of our Constitution as well as the Mayor.

Good show Oak Harbor!

[barefoot2626]

Respect71 wrote:

<quoted text>
And your back with you small immature insults

How sad that you dish it out but cry like a five year old child whose mommy won't buy him his candy when it gets tossed in his face.

Hypocrite.

PS: get some new material, honey.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

They are scared little mice.

I'm not the big fat pusspuss who needs to carry a weapon to make his tiny dickie stiff.

Jaggoff.

[barefoot2626]

just another guy wrote:

<quoted text>
They are scared little mice.

WAHHHHHHHHHH! WAHHHHHHH! MOMMY! Democracy! Not fair! WAHHHHHHHHHH!

DENVER — Lawmakers moved closer on Friday to passing a package of new gun restrictions in Colorado, a state that has lived under the shadow of two of the worst mass shootings in United States history.

After hours of debate that lasted well into the evening, Colorado’s House of Representatives gave initial approval to legislation requiring background checks on private gun sales and placing limits on ammunition magazines — measures that were being watched nationally by advocates on both sides of the issue.

The bills were part of an array of gun proposals being pushed hard by state Democrats this year after the shooting at an Aurora movie theater last summer and the killings at an elementary school in Connecticut in December.

“There is a common thread that we see in these massacres,” said State Representative Rhonda Fields, a Democrat from Aurora who sponsored both pieces of legislation and whose son was shot to death in 2005.“They’re using high-capacity magazines so they can unleash as many bullets as they can, to kill as many people as they can, in our schools, our theaters and our churches.”

The debate over whether to enhance restrictions on firearms has become a contentious focal point of state legislative sessions around the country this year.

Perhaps nowhere has this been the case more than in Colorado, a state with deep conservative and independent streaks. But it is also a place that has been pondering tougher guns laws since the Columbine school shooting in 1999, and the increasing influence of Democratic lawmakers in recent years has made gun-control legislation a political possibility.

Friday’s debate on the House floor capped a week in which gun bills proposed by Democrats cleared several legislative committees, often after lengthy and emotional comments, mostly from proponents of gun rights. Republican legislators argued for hours against the measures, saying the proposed magazine limits — 15 rounds for guns and 8 for shotguns — were merely arbitrary and would have little effect on gun violence.

“It makes no difference to public safety if there are 10 rounds in a magazine, whether there are 15 rounds in a magazine or whether there are 30 rounds,” said State Representative Jared Wright, a Republican from Fruita.