Six Figure Settlement in Ott Case
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#44 May 31, 2013
Check Reality wrote:
This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit they will see why she was awarded that sum of money. It's all in there. If the city had a case they would put their proof out. As it stands they and the insurance company tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Plain and simple.$450,000 and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, what a travesty.
You have no proof for your allegations. Hope Sweeney doesn't find out about this post. I think he'd love to take you up on a libel suit.
Ha Ha

Arnold, MO

#45 May 31, 2013
Sweeney, you mean the guy that suffers from LDS? What a twerp. This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit they will see why she was awarded that sum of money. It's all in there. If the city had a case they would put their proof out. As it stands they and the insurance company tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Plain and simple.$450,000 and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, what a travesty.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#46 May 31, 2013
Ha Ha wrote:
Sweeney, you mean the guy that suffers from LDS? What a twerp. This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit they will see why she was awarded that sum of money. It's all in there. If the city had a case they would put their proof out. As it stands they and the insurance company tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Plain and simple.$450,000 and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, what a travesty.
More libel.
Check Reality

Arnold, MO

#47 May 31, 2013
All you ever talk about is libel, and prove it. Are you an attorney now? You are a joke.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#48 Jun 1, 2013
Check Reality wrote:
All you ever talk about is libel, and prove it. Are you an attorney now? You are a joke.
Nope, not an attorney.

And you are the joke. I don't think you know HOW to tell the truth. That's sad.
Reality Check

Arnold, MO

#49 Jun 1, 2013
This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit they will see why she was awarded that sum of money. It's all in there. If the city had a case they would put their proof out. As it stands they and the insurance company tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Plain and simple.$450,000 and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, what a travesty.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#50 Jun 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit they will see why she was awarded that sum of money. It's all in there. If the city had a case they would put their proof out. As it stands they and the insurance company tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Plain and simple.$450,000 and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, what a travesty.
Seems all you can do is cut and paste. Ever try to put some thought into your posts? Apparently not. You also can't keep from twisting the truth.
Reality Check

Arnold, MO

#51 Jun 1, 2013
I have been trying to dumb things down so you can understand. The only twisting of the truth in Arnold comes from city hall and the propaganda it releases on a regular basis to the local media.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#52 Jun 1, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
I have been trying to dumb things down so you can understand. The only twisting of the truth in Arnold comes from city hall and the propaganda it releases on a regular basis to the local media.
Actually, you started out dumb so no need to try to dumb it down anymore. It is you that just don't get it. You don't see any other opinions or options than your conspiracy theory. If it doesn't back your theory then you throw it out even though it may be the truth.

The people are tired of your crap. That's why they voted you out.
Reality Check

Arnold, MO

#53 Jun 2, 2013
This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit, a copy of which is available at www.Scribd.com they will see what prompted the awarding of such a large sum of money. It's all in the filing. If the city had a case the insurance company would have pursued it vigorously as they clearly state on their website. As it stands they fairly settled a claim where liability existed, in other words tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Also clearly stated on their website is they do not settle claims based solely on the most economical option available. Plain and simple.$450,000 paid out because liability existed, NOT because it was cheaper and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, that is wrong no matter how you try to candy coat it.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#54 Jun 2, 2013
Reality Check wrote:
This is about a six figure settlement paid to Officer Ott. If one reads the lawsuit, a copy of which is available at www.Scribd.com they will see what prompted the awarding of such a large sum of money. It's all in the filing. If the city had a case the insurance company would have pursued it vigorously as they clearly state on their website. As it stands they fairly settled a claim where liability existed, in other words tucked their tail between their legs and paid up! Also clearly stated on their website is they do not settle claims based solely on the most economical option available. Plain and simple.$450,000 paid out because liability existed, NOT because it was cheaper and the offending officer and his superior retain their jobs and salaries, that is wrong no matter how you try to candy coat it.
And yet you weren't directly involved in any of this so you do not know what the real facts are. Is this your opinion or are you stating this as fact?
Not Saying You Are Dense

Arnold, MO

#56 Jun 3, 2013
Put that shoe right on! Proof was posted, you just fail to acknowledge it.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#57 Jun 3, 2013
All you posted was a copy of the lawsuit. That isn't proof in any court you're convicting people of a crime with your comments...maybe falsely as the lawsuit never made it before a jury to determine guilt.

So, are you're comments your opinion or fact? I'd be careful how you answer with that whole libel thing.
hello

United States

#58 Jun 3, 2013
Letusnamenames wrote:
All you posted was a copy of the lawsuit. That isn't proof in any court you're convicting people of a crime with your comments...maybe falsely as the lawsuit never made it before a jury to determine guilt.
So, are you're comments your opinion or fact? I'd be careful how you answer with that whole libel thing.
take your libel and shove it up your keister.

Letusnamenames

Since: Apr 13

Location hidden

#59 Jun 3, 2013
hello wrote:
<quoted text>take your libel and shove it up your keister.
I don't like things up there that don't belong.

Why don't you try telling the truth for a change and sticking to the proven facts?

Hiding your proxy again? Do you have something to hide? Why aren't you open like you preach to the government? You should practice what you preach.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Arnold Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Michael jessup Fri Tracy 2
Where do the Afican Americans hang out in Arnol... (Aug '10) Aug 26 Wake Up 38
News Lawsuit accuses municipalities of targeting the... Aug 22 VeeBee 6
What happened to Kimmswick? (Jan '06) Aug 13 Addit 790
Westward trails Aug 12 Edd 3
Is fenton a racist city Aug 11 Funny 7
Fox 2 News anna elise parks lookalike Stratford... Aug 10 bud man 7

Arnold Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Arnold Mortgages