More IP Addresses Sought

More IP Addresses Sought

Posted in the Arnold Forum

WitchHunt

Saint Louis, MO

#1 Aug 1, 2014
I read in the news that the attorney for the three claiming libel has gone back to court seeking information for 8 more IP addresses. He claims there were libelous comments made against his clients from 8 more.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm wondering if enough damage wasn't done with what already happened? We got the super out and a couple others that were caught up, too. Why go after more? Wasn't the point made? And I'm curious what these other comments were. Was it simple name calling? If that's it, then I personally feel people are getting too sensitive. Whatever happened to freedom of speech in that case? If they were as bad as the first ones accusing them of actions that they didn't do (child molestation, beasteality, sexual orientation falsehoods), then okay. I understand that. But simple name calling possibly? Where is the line drawn?

Sam, could you please elaborate on the comments that the other 8 IP addresses made that were libelous? I think more light needs to be shed on this.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/...
Doris Borgelt

Arnold, MO

#2 Aug 1, 2014
What if there were more administrators, family members, teachers or maybe even board members that participated in this on-line bullying? They need to be included.
WitchHunt

Arnold, MO

#3 Aug 1, 2014
And what if a private citizen got caught up in this mess?

I would like to know which comments are being obtained and what they said.
Doris Borgelt

Arnold, MO

#4 Aug 1, 2014
Well, you will be able to see them as soon as everyone else does as long as the judge agrees to it. What if private citizens are caught up in it? "
It will be because they participated.
Interesting

Sikeston, MO

#5 Aug 1, 2014
I really wish Dr. Rizzi would go after the person that said he was a pedophile.
Eileen

Arnold, MO

#6 Aug 2, 2014
WitchHunt wrote:
I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm wondering if enough damage wasn't done with what already happened? We got the super out and a couple others that were caught up, too. Why go after more? Wasn't the point made?
So your logic is that even if people committed a crime, since one or two have already been named, let's just let the rest go, because it's a "witch hunt"?

What kind of "damage" do you think has been done, that it's "enough"? To who? For what?

Using your logic, if ten people rob a bank, only one or two should be prosecuted because the point would be made, and no need to "damage" all the criminals.

Holding people accountable for their criminal activity is what society does to ensure our laws are upheld by our citizens. It is not set aside because the criminals have had enough "damage" and we don't want to be really mean to the bad guys.

Ridiculous.
Wow

Sikeston, MO

#7 Aug 5, 2014
Herman filed a motion to compel charter and att again. They added a couple new ones though.
From casenet:

Plaintiffs First Motion to Compel the University of Missouri, the Missouri Research and Education Network, to Disclose Subscriber Information of Defendants

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Arnold Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
If you eat sleep and breath the paranormal... (Nov '10) 13 hr SEMO 1999 5
Spingdale Pool & Bar 15 hr justin igger 6
Stratford Inn Fenton 15 hr justin igger 5
More Muslims In Fenton Dec 8 watchin 16
Fox C6 Board of Education : Discussion (Jun '14) Dec 5 Eileen 1,493
Hotties at Philip 66 by dollar general Dec 3 You bet 24
Where do the Afican Americans hang out in Arnol... (Aug '10) Nov 22 Augustus 50

Arnold Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Arnold Mortgages