dads who don't pay child

Posted in the Antwerp Forum

moment

United States

#1 Sep 6, 2013
I am annoyed by dads who have all this extra stuff that they don't need to live on and yet refuse to pay child support or the correct amounts.they work under the table to screw the baby ma out of money or even have a job claim they are poor and go out and buy new stuff but can't buy needs of the kids smh
SuzieQ

Gouverneur, NY

#2 Sep 6, 2013
Thenkeep your scanklegs closed and ou wo't have toworry about being annyed.
Haaaaa

Gouverneur, NY

#3 Sep 6, 2013
moment wrote:
I am annoyed by dads who have all this extra stuff that they don't need to live on and yet refuse to pay child support or the correct amounts.they work under the table to screw the baby ma out of money or even have a job claim they are poor and go out and buy new stuff but can't buy needs of the kids smh
that's what family court is for better get to it it takes a long time to get a court date
smb

Gouverneur, NY

#4 Sep 6, 2013
What about some of the single mothers that get child support,and spend it on their own selfish needs. They buy themselves the most expensive clothing, are usually in the bar rooms every week-end etc.
But their kids have nothing!!!
Haaaaa

Gouverneur, NY

#5 Sep 7, 2013
smb wrote:
What about some of the single mothers that get child support,and spend it on their own selfish needs. They buy themselves the most expensive clothing, are usually in the bar rooms every week-end etc.
But their kids have nothing!!!
. I think they should have to show where they spend the support money they get only fair .
yep

Gouverneur, NY

#6 Sep 7, 2013
As someone who pays over 300 a week in support it pisses me off to see my kids being evicted from EVERY place they live and going with no fuel and utilities I firmly believe that the scumbagggg mother should be made to prove what she is spending the money on.
exactly

Armonk, NY

#7 Sep 7, 2013
Totally agree /\ I know a lot if single mothers who take the child support to support thier own habits! And the kids get told no when they need or want something! I think the mother should also be made to work instead of going to court all the time demanding more money from these guys! Especially when they have the children the same amount of time! And for the record I am a girl standing up for some of these guys because they do try and get ripped off because the mothers just want money!
lmfao

Gouverneur, NY

#8 Sep 7, 2013
Love How this post totally back fired.
spence

New York, NY

#9 Sep 8, 2013
If a couple goes to court for custody. Lets make the decision by who can support the kids. Many men would take custody of their children without getting support from the woman. Custody should go to who ever can support the children without having to go to court and extort money from the other parent. Doing it that way would lead to a lay off at social services. We can't have that. Taxes might go down. If one parent can support the child without support from the other parent or welfare why not do that? If they are a good parent. Not a druggie or drunk or abusive why not?
hmmm

United States

#10 Sep 9, 2013
Haaaaa wrote:
<quoted text>. I think they should have to show where they spend the support money they get only fair .
well if they get none that'd be hard lol
mother

Edwards, NY

#11 Sep 9, 2013
I did support my kids and the father was supposed to pay $28 a month in support for the 3. I was married to him, just in case anyone wants to know. He never paid and I did keep taking him to court. I got $12 a month to pay for diapers for 3 children. I did get assistance for dss. I needed the help until i got on my feet. The father would keep getting drawn into court but still would not pay. Why should a father get the kids, even if they are getting good money. most fathers dont want them. A mother does want them, most of them anyway. I do think a mother should show where the money is spent. I dont agree with parents having kids and using them for money. I know too many that do that. I love my kids very much and the father did not want them. so just because a father can support them does not mean they should get them.
spence

Danielson, CT

#12 Sep 10, 2013
If the father can support them but doesn't want them. He should be made to pay. But if the father can support them and does want them. And is willing to do so without any support from the mother or our tax dollars. He should be allowed to have them. After all. The fathers and mothers are the ones that should support them. Not the tax payers. Of course the children shouldn't be forced to live with a drunk or druggie or anyone abusive. In cases where a man is a good father and wants and loves his kids. If he can take care of them. On his own. He should have them. Why should he pay support to a woman that won't work and only wants the kids to get his money. And uses the system to destroy his life.
towns

United States

#13 Sep 10, 2013
Every court case is different and has a different outcome.just because someone has more money doesn't make them a better match for the kid or kids in that case.what matters is that the other parent helps support the kid or kids and that they get what they need from both parents not just money
spence

Danielson, CT

#14 Sep 11, 2013
I just seems that a lot of the men are capable loving fathers. Ones that could support the kids on their own. Instead they have to give a huge part of their PAY check to a woman that couldn't survive without the child support and welfare benefits. Let the father raise and support the kids. Let the mother support herself and not live off his pay check. If the mother isn't willing to work to support her own kids I feel she is an unfit mother. The kids will learn to live off the system. Then we have another welfare generation. It goes on and on. That is what social services wants. Without the welfare recipients they would be out of a job. Welfare kids are to social service what cows are to farmers.
mike chambers

Springfield, MA

#15 Sep 11, 2013
spence wrote:
If a couple goes to court for custody. Lets make the decision by who can support the kids. Many men would take custody of their children without getting support from the woman. Custody should go to who ever can support the children without having to go to court and extort money from the other parent. Doing it that way would lead to a lay off at social services. We can't have that. Taxes might go down. If one parent can support the child without support from the other parent or welfare why not do that? If they are a good parent. Not a druggie or drunk or abusive why not?
Excellent point !!!
fyi

Gouverneur, NY

#16 Sep 11, 2013
Just an fyi that judge in slc is far from fair! We have custody of my husbands children and we went to stop support NOT GET ANY lets make that clear. We had to pay out of pocket for a lawyer bc this woman tried to make my husband continue to pay support bc this moron said we still have to maintain a home for those kids.... SERIOUSLY..... WHAT ABOUT THE HOME WE MAINTAIN! In the long run it eventually worked out but not until the greedy biitchh of an ex took and spent over a grand of our money that the FAMILY court judge says if we want back we have to take her to civil court. The way I see it ... the judge owes us!!!!!

And also when it was all worked out in the end she had to pay us 30 a week. Really?? We payed over 300
spence

Danielson, CT

#17 Sep 12, 2013
It should be. That when a family breaks up. Some family member steps up and supports the kids. Father,Mother,Aunts or Uncles or Grandparents. I realize That in some families all mentioned are on welfare. Why should a Man support a drunken ex wife and her latest drunken boyfriend. He and the kids would be better off if they lived with him. I do know that all Dads aren't saints. But they aren't getting custody. there is a lot of cases where the mother is worthless and the father is good. But he has to pay her. Then there are the cases where they both are worthless. The kids don't have a chance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Antwerp Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Two Gouverneur men, one North Lawrence woman ja... 2 hr Please 4
Doesn't Feel Good, huh, Joe Lacks? Apr 24 Jerry 2
Kfc in Gouverneur Apr 23 Nealio 91
News St. Lawrence County legislators want Amish to i... Apr 23 Nealio 3
arlyss ???? Apr 21 2 sense enjoy 2
Gouverneur police why do we still pay them Apr 20 Jerry 31
who is hollie platt (bristol) (Apr '11) Apr 20 Unbelievable 28
More from around the web

Antwerp People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]