California Federal Court ruled Pot is...

California Federal Court ruled Pot is as dangerous as Heroin

Posted in the Antrim Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#1 Jan 27, 2013
And worse than Methampetamine.
There is no medical benefit..said Justice Savage

Pot will continue to be illegal under Federal law

Haaaaaaa

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#2 Jan 27, 2013
Love it.. Been saying the samething...pot IS as back as all illicit drugs

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#3 Jan 27, 2013
And causes limpy biscuit lol

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#4 Jan 27, 2013
Bad*
The poor Justice needs body armor, the lunatic pot smokings are.going.apechit.lol!!!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#5 Jan 27, 2013
Limpy biscuit.. LOL
No medical benefits ever been proven
Its the potheads delusionals
Res ipsa loquitur

United States

#6 Jan 27, 2013
The "California federal court"?!

You don't see anything wrong with that?!

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#7 Jan 27, 2013
Res ipsa loquitur wrote:
The "California federal court"?!
You don't see anything wrong with that?!
No I dont. Its still a federal law in every state.. Its a small win against pot heads.. Hell the Gov of Colorado wants to repeal legalizing pot..

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#8 Jan 27, 2013
Just because 54%.of the voters are potheads doesnt make it correct.. I suppose if 54% of Ill voters voted in.second degree murder is legal that would be ok too lol

It wont stick and your not getting your vending machines

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#9 Jan 27, 2013
Some pothead took it to federal court.. Court basically said fk you pothead lol

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#10 Jan 27, 2013
It was Reagan that banned testing marijuana lol
So Judge wasnt bsing.. Theres never been any controlled testing...just pothead theroy

How can you say pot helps during chemo?
Your all.fucked up anyway

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#12 Jan 27, 2013
Did you forget every state has federal courts lol

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#13 Jan 27, 2013
I think he might be slightly misinformed that its as bad as herion.. But the contents of both being illicit..marijuana changes brain chemistry like any of those drugs
Res ipsa loquitur

United States

#15 Jan 27, 2013
Pattys winning photo wrote:
<quoted text>
No I dont. Its still a federal law in every state.. Its a small win against pot heads.. Hell the Gov of Colorado wants to repeal legalizing pot..
Of course you don't see anything wrong with it. That's because you're a dumbass pretend paralegal. There is no such thing as the California federal court. You combined two systems of justice. It would either be the U.S district or circuit court, located in Cali but not a Cali court.

Also, when did judges become doctors? Can they also diagnose and prescribe something for your vaginal dryness?

And finally, despite the federal stance on marijuana, California legalized it for medicinal use and has been distributing it for years.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#18 Jan 27, 2013
Here comes the pothead rage lol!!

I will be back after your drug withdrawal lol!!
Res ipsa loquitur

United States

#19 Jan 27, 2013
Thought you should also know that nicotine addiction has been compared to heroin by doctors for more than 30 years and counting.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#20 Jan 27, 2013
Res ipsa loquitur wrote:
Thought you should also know that nicotine addiction has been compared to heroin by doctors for more than 30 years and counting.
im sure it is.. This decision.was made for lack of study..there hasnt been any...Dunno where judge got the info about heroin. Pulled it out of his ass. Judges are allowed lol

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#21 Jan 27, 2013
A federal judge isnt going against federal law
Its still against federal law to smoke pot in.all states regardless of state laws.. Federal supersedes state regardless
States can pass any law.. It never is above federal
Im sure you learned that in your fake studies

Uhhh federalism?.duh

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#22 Jan 27, 2013
You have a federal court and a federal appeals ( circuit) circuit 9...you didnt know that?
They are both federal.. No matter where the judge sits, hes a federal judge in a federal court. He heres federal questions not state
Maybe going back to fake school might help you
And get off the drugs

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#23 Jan 27, 2013
Lets try in laymans

State court=appeals to state supreme court
Federal courts=appeal to federal circut courts
The state of California has all those courts

Our federal appeals is combined with other states.
Its located in Mass.. Federal circuit 1

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#24 Jan 27, 2013
So yes, a California Federal Judge is correct
LA Times didnt fk up lol

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Antrim Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Announcement: Desire Belmore finally admitted J... 2 hr Burt Rambeau 10
When are the Greenfield Police arresting Desire... 2 hr Sharon 46
Why Patty has nearly 2800 followers on Twitter 4 hr Burt Rambeau 4
The Greenfield Police knew Cullinan drove drunk... Jul 2 Sharon 35
Update on drunk driver Jenny Cullinan in Antrim Jun 30 Sharon 16
History Jun 28 Burt Rambeau 56
Patty just called and I'm truly laughing ! Jun 25 WOW 25
More from around the web

Antrim People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Antrim Mortgages