Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201844 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178322 Feb 3, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
All strawman no substance.
Has Rose_NoHo impressed you again tonight with a particularly "intelligent and insightful" post? How about the one about lions licking their asses?

Too Funny!
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178323 Feb 3, 2013
Bore On wrote:
Was the last poster a:
1.) Out of towner?
2.) A bore on?
3.) Just a out of work idiot?
4.) Out of country poster?
5.) a non US citizen that supports the Repubicans?
6.) Married to a Republican but not a citizen?
7.) out to the cleaners.
8.) Folding tin hats to protect their heads.
9.) Four idiots who are asking who's on top?
Your town sucks.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178324 Feb 3, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Off of Broadway, almost in my old backyard...
:D
Got a crazy cousin lives out there. Not far from the VFW. Nice bar there, open to the public, just sign in at the door.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178325 Feb 3, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
How hard is it for people like you to understand the concept of two consenting adults?
Or three consenting adults?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178326 Feb 3, 2013
Largelanguage wrote:
<quoted text>
How cute! Now the little boy mikey is spreading his insecurities of approval and attention onto us! He knows I'm the big bad round here, but he doesn't like it!
Too funny! Arnold liked it too!

http://www.honekut.com/HonEkutCom_Audio/Sound...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178327 Feb 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Has Rose_NoHo impressed you again tonight with a particularly "intelligent and insightful" post? How about the one about lions licking their asses?
Too Funny!
Morron doesn't realize that that is all off-topic, and I see that Big D won't mention it to them...
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178328 Feb 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Or three consenting adults?
What's good for two can only be better for three...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178329 Feb 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Or three consenting adults?
Why yes, of course.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178330 Feb 3, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
That's dumb because the Christians would be coming out their asses too. So they'd taste them all over again. Duh.
Excellent observation. And if a lion wants to lick his Chongo, let him.
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178331 Feb 3, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Why yes, of course.
Good man.
:-D

Got the Ford incident all sorted out ?
Randy -Rock- Hudson

Wooster, OH

#178332 Feb 3, 2013
Later, kids, off to work..

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#178333 Feb 3, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Good man.
:-D
Got the Ford incident all sorted out ?
Not entirely. Got the check from the insurance company deposited. I gotta hand it to 'em for being more than fair. I'll be sorting out a new truck as soon as the weather is in my favor and I feel limber enough to put one through some maneuvers. Gotta strecth of road that my old one performed poorly on (no, not the scene of the crash) that I want to run down. Stretch of 65 mph concrete divided four lane that had the thing rocking from front to rear rather violently. I think it was a function of wheel base (crew cab long bed) and the distance between expansion joints in the slab. Very annoying experience that could best be described as Yshyahyahyahyahyahyahyahyahyah yahyahyahyahyahyah... Perhaps a little bit slower than that, but annoying all the same. I'm on that stretch a fair fraction of my driving time around here and would like to not experience it anymore.
Black momma OG

Norwalk, CA

#178334 Feb 3, 2013
sheesh void of hate wrote:
<quoted text>
Why yes, of course.
I am glad you are fine you are wonder woman and little angel on your shoulder

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#178336 Feb 4, 2013
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No matter how often you post that analogy, it doesn't hold water. For a couple of reasons. One being nuts are fruits, by definition. Another being that the ability to bear fruit is part of the definition of a fruit tree, but the ability to have kids isn't part of the definition of marriage.
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
LOL, what a pointless statement.
Humanity wouldn't exist were it not for children.
<quoted text>
I've never murdered any child.
Why did you make that up?
LOLSER!
STILL no logical counter to this fact;

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.

STILL no logical counter to this fact;

A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.

Even funnier?

The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!

Ho, Ho, Ho, Hilarious!!!
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#178338 Feb 4, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
All strawman no substance.
Yes, indeed. These low information types make me laugh out loud with their wacked-out logic.
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#178339 Feb 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Gay couples are the picture of defective failure. Mating behavior gone abusive with NOTHING to show for it.
STILL no logical counter to this fact;
A fruit tree bearing fruit.
A fruit tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A nut tree who never bears fruit wanting to be a fruit tree.
A nut tree hanging fruit on it's branches pretending to be a fruit tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' fruit trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call nut trees fruit trees too!
Ho, Ho, Ho, Hilarious!!!
Yep, your post is hilarious. I can't wait to see a tree hanging fruit on its own branches pretending to be a nut tree. Do you live in Munchkin Land?
Jane Dodo

Hoboken, NJ

#178340 Feb 4, 2013
Randy -Rock- Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
What's good for two can only be better for three...
Did you just use the 3 > 2 argument?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178341 Feb 4, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Or three consenting adults?
I'd settle for getting laid, but Kimare's not having it.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#178342 Feb 4, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you just use the 3 > 2 argument?
He did. Next he'll counter with something entirely insane like "why don't you marry your gerbil while you're at it."

It never fails.

We just want to marry the person we love, and they have to bring in plural marriage because they have no argument against SSM, other than the fact that they find it "creepy"?

As for me, Kimare won't even let the missus look at me; he's afraid she'll turn lesbo when she sees me.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#178344 Feb 4, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
He did. Next he'll counter with something entirely insane like "why don't you marry your gerbil while you're at it."
It never fails.
We just want to marry the person we love, and they have to bring in plural marriage because they have no argument against SSM, other than the fact that they find it "creepy"?
As for me, Kimare won't even let the missus look at me; he's afraid she'll turn lesbo when she sees me.
Yeah "they" sure are jackasses! You can't marry gerbils. They're for butts! But you should be allowed to marry who you want.

You aren't insisting on the traditional, arbitrary and discriminatory number of two while at the same time insisting gender is irrelevant. Are you?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Antioch Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Main and empire 1 hr Kk laurie 1
Is Brentwood considered part of Section 8 housi... (Aug '06) 12 hr Jason Wells 106
Pioneer Antoich Norteno Rapper Dies (Mar '07) Jul 30 NORTE SOLDADO 1,565
News Antioch police probe infant's near-drowning Jul 29 Nicole bc 1
Unsolved murders in Antioch (Mar '12) Jul 29 Linda 24
News Contra Costa Times/Oakland Tribune editorial: M... Jul 28 Jodyshouse 1
News The Carvery in Downtown Livermore Closes (Nov '13) Jul 24 Ssophiiee 9
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Antioch Mortgages