Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law

Obama Signs NDAA Martial Law

Posted in the Antioch Forum

dickie

Antioch, CA

#1 Dec 17, 2011
Watch This!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Guaranty of Civil War. Get arrested for anything & risk Indefinite Detention or Defend your Life & GOD Given Rights " this Evil act doesn't change that". Senate & Obama "NWO" passed NDAA (Legal Holocaust bill) SOPA PIPA Ending all of Your Rights.
Liberty is Freedom

Chicago, IL

#2 Dec 17, 2011
dickie wrote:
Watch This!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Guaranty of Civil War. Get arrested for anything & risk Indefinite Detention or Defend your Life & GOD Given Rights " this Evil act doesn't change that". Senate & Obama "NWO" passed NDAA (Legal Holocaust bill) SOPA PIPA Ending all of Your Rights.
@@@@@@@@@@

Well Mr. DICK Head, "dickie". Liberty is Freedom has been writting that this is comming for over two years. An "YOU" Mr. DICK Head, "dickie" have been saying no this will never happen. Well dickie. How wrong can "YOU" be ?

Now this day by your own words you have taken my side. Thanks for your surrender.

BUT< fact is you are very stupid in your tactics...
dickie

Antioch, CA

#3 Dec 17, 2011
Just admit it, you voted for obama, and plan to do it again in 2012... you aren't fooling anybody.

Suckin too many things through the dryer exhaust vent has made you lose your mind.
Liberty is Freedom

United States

#4 Dec 18, 2011
dickie wrote:
Just admit it, you voted for obama, and plan to do it again in 2012... you aren't fooling anybody.
Suckin too many things through the dryer exhaust vent has made you lose your mind.
NOT Close. I'll be using your admission on a later date.
question

Bethpage, TN

#5 Dec 19, 2011
Concerning H.R. Bill 1540....there is a you tube video that has been posted the last several days, in the video ANONYMOUS has mislead some of you to believe that civil liberties may be at risk due to this bill being passed. While I will agree that our civil liberties are under attack, this bill is not one of them....in the bill it clearly states that in....SEC. 1032. REQUIREMENT FOR MILITARY CUSTODY.

(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-

(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.

also if you go up to...... SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

(e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

Basically your constitutional rights are safe for now......
dickie

Antioch, CA

#6 Dec 19, 2011
This bill does codify indefinite detention into law.

It expressly empowers the President — with regard to anyone accused of the acts in section (b)– to detain them “without trial until the end of the hostilities.” That is the very definition of “indefinite detention,” and the statute could not be clearer that it vests this power. Anyone claiming this bill does not codify indefinite detention should be forced to explain how they can claim that in light of this crystal clear provision.

http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_a...
question

Bethpage, TN

#7 Dec 19, 2011
dickie wrote:
This bill does codify indefinite detention into law.
It expressly empowers the President — with regard to anyone accused of the acts in section (b)– to detain them “without trial until the end of the hostilities.” That is the very definition of “indefinite detention,” and the statute could not be clearer that it vests this power. Anyone claiming this bill does not codify indefinite detention should be forced to explain how they can claim that in light of this crystal clear provision.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_a...
SEC. 1031. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY FORCE.

(e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.

it says it right there plain as day.....it does not affect U.S. citizens and does not take precedent over existing laws...including constitutional rights.
Stoneman

Chicago, IL

#8 Dec 20, 2011
i'll but in for a second.

Should any be lucky enough to own property hed by Federal Lease. Which specifies, "No Codes" No Regulations" & "Unrestricted Use", Nothing would apply.

Those arethe "FACTS" of owning Property on the decommissioned Camp Stoneman in California.

The few of a few properties left in America where all of ones Constitutional Rights are intact...
Stoneman

Chicago, IL

#9 Dec 20, 2011
Put your little pin heads togather and a point can be made. There is still property under Federal Lease with all rights intact. Which means the City, County Government has no jurisdiction, which means, City Ordances also do not have authority.

Also the Federal Lease I refer, too states "No Parking on the streets".

Cleadly you dick heads who are working in authority really should be doing your job and writting parking tickets. Currently Pittsburg P.D. is in violation of a Federal agreement.

GO FISH !
Stoneman

Chicago, IL

#10 Dec 20, 2011
Lets talk about "ABUSE OF AUTHORITY".
Ken Webber

Marlin, TX

#11 Dec 22, 2011
I am debunking the person - TROLL - above who said it does not apply to American citizens. You are full of it. 1031 DOES apply to ALL people including American citizens. Under 1031 ANYONE can be picked up by the military. They are to then be exported outside US LEGAL JURISDICTION for purposes of an "interrogation" torture session. If you cling to being an American citizen they simply repeat the torture until you admit to whatever it is they say you are. Then you disappear, FOREVER! 1032 is the section that says it does not apply to American citizens but you already gave up those protections in the interrogation to determine if you were a "covered person." To say it extends no new powers is a blatant lie. It does nothing new in America, however, the torture session takes place OUTSIDE US LEGAL jurisdiction in a foreign country. So what takes place in the jungle, stays in the jungle. This bill is EVIL, it repeals the US Constitution and the bill of rights and anyone can read section 1031 and see what it says and IMPLIES. So to the communist Nazi saying the bill doesn't apply to American citizen, you are 100% debunked and shown to be a TROLL.
Cruze

United States

#12 Dec 22, 2011
Ken Webber wrote:
I am debunking the person - TROLL - above who said it does not apply to American citizens. You are full of it. 1031 DOES apply to ALL people including American citizens. Under 1031 ANYONE can be picked up by the military. They are to then be exported outside US LEGAL JURISDICTION for purposes of an "interrogation" torture session. If you cling to being an American citizen they simply repeat the torture until you admit to whatever it is they say you are. Then you disappear, FOREVER! 1032 is the section that says it does not apply to American citizens but you already gave up those protections in the interrogation to determine if you were a "covered person." To say it extends no new powers is a blatant lie. It does nothing new in America, however, the torture session takes place OUTSIDE US LEGAL jurisdiction in a foreign country. So what takes place in the jungle, stays in the jungle. This bill is EVIL, it repeals the US Constitution and the bill of rights and anyone can read section 1031 and see what it says and IMPLIES. So to the communist Nazi saying the bill doesn't apply to American citizen, you are 100% debunked and shown to be a TROLL.
@@@@@@@@@@
It is a "PLEASURE" to meet someone who "UNDERSTANDS" and can "ARTICULATE" "FACTS" of "LAW"...

Thank You
LtC. U.S.A., Ret
@@@@@@@@@@
An independant Australian

Australia

#13 Dec 23, 2011
Why this bill obliterates your constitutional rights:
"(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States."

Note the word 'requirement'. Under this bill foreign nationals MUST be handed over to the military and US citizens CAN be handed over (how you prove you're an American citizen when you're walking down the street is another matter...).

"e) Authorities- Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities, relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States."
Both Bush and Obama have explicitly asserted (as though that makes it fact) that as CIC of the armed forces they already have the right to detain or assassinate 'terrorists'. Drone strokes have previously been used to target American citizens overseas so precedent dictates they already have that right. This is why that statement says; 'Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law'. If they wanted to garantee your rights they would have said 'Nothing in this section shall be construed to infringe the constitutional rights of US citizens'.

It was worded that way for a reason.

Things are different in Australia because we don't have any constitutional rights so our government can do whatever it wants, whenever it wants. Seems your 'leaders' want the same power.
Cruse

United States

#14 Dec 23, 2011
dickie wrote:
This bill does codify indefinite detention into law.
It expressly empowers the President — with regard to anyone accused of the acts in section (b)– to detain them “without trial until the end of the hostilities.” That is the very definition of “indefinite detention,” and the statute could not be clearer that it vests this power. Anyone claiming this bill does not codify indefinite detention should be forced to explain how they can claim that in light of this crystal clear provision.
http://www.salon.com/2011/12/16/three_myths_a...
@@@@@@@@@@

Your "SMOKE" dickie, is the same "SMOKE" Contra Costa County Government EMPLOYEES is "BLOWING UP Everyones AZZ".

As you can "READ" I have support.

@@@@@@@@@@

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Antioch Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Two shot in Antioch on Thursday night (Oct '12) 37 min Spoiled White People 4
Why is Oakley turning into a section 8 haven ? (Jul '09) 42 min Spoiled White People 36
Antioch Middle School Teacher hit in face Apr 25 Travis Wheatley 4
News Antioch Council endorses cheaper, innovative ra... Apr 14 neighborhood sens... 1
News Antioch: Congressmen McNerney and DeSaulnier to... Apr 14 preuser 1
Old School Autoworks (Jan '10) Apr 13 MyBirdBack 33
News Antioch approves cameras at intersection near s... Apr 12 neighborhood 1

Antioch Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Antioch Mortgages