Clinton supporters rue what might have been

BRIDGEPORT, W.Va. - It seems like only a few days ago, right after Hillary Clinton 's big primary win in Pennsylvania, that Margaret Hamrick was on the phone with one of her bank customers, rejoicing at what ...

[bobby- g]

I remember what Ronald Reagan said when asked if a woman would one day be president. He answered, "of course a woman will be elected but she will be a Republican". The major, insurmountable problem Queen Hillary has is not gender but her personality. She is without doubt the most polarizing individual in the history of American politics. In everything from her ensemble of Mao jackets and pant suits, to her socialist approach to generic issues make people either love or hate her. This is a fact and it is indisputable. Thanks.

[The laughing liberal]

The Obama implosion continues with fact that his adviser was meeting with the Terrorist Group Hamas.

He said they wouldn't talk to them. Obama is starting to lie like Hillary now.

Very disappointing!

[Yep]

There will not be a president called Sadam Ossama, I mean Barak Obama.

He's not electable, McCain will win if the DNC choses him.

I think both parties are corrupted by the Central Banks.

Look up "what is a central Bank" if you're not sure.

Go Hillary!

[SMS]

I was thinking about this bitter comment that people are still hammering Obama on....why is it that when Senator Clinton made those comments to ABC about hard-working Americans, white Americans, and wrote those off as a poor choice of words it was accepted as such. However, when Senator Obama used "bitter" instead of "angry/frustrated" and "cling" instead of "rely on", Senator Clinton pounced on them and labeled him as an elitist. Senator Obama's poor choice of words no more make him an elitist who looks down on small-town people than Senator Clinton's make her a racist who looks down on African Americans (which both their RECORDS indicate clearly otherwise).

[Bill]

Mmmmm, let's see now. Here is another reason for Clinton to stay in and fight on to the convention and for those weak super delegates to ponder.

Although Obama has won more states and pledged delegates, on the electoral college scoreboard, he only scores 210 votes. Clinton, meanwhile scores 251 votes, not counting Florida or Michigan and the remaining primaries. Also, if the Democrats had a winner take all policy in their primaries, wonder who would be ahead in pledged delegates?? Only the Democrats can FUBB a primary.

Fight on Hillary!!

[ruth]

Bill wrote:

Mmmmm, let's see now. Here is another reason for Clinton to stay in and fight on to the convention and for those weak super delegates to ponder.
Although Obama has won more states and pledged delegates, on the electoral college scoreboard, he only scores 210 votes. Clinton, meanwhile scores 251 votes, not counting Florida or Michigan and the remaining primaries. Also, if the Democrats had a winner take all policy in their primaries, wonder who would be ahead in pledged delegates?? Only the Democrats can FUBB a primary.
Fight on Hillary!!

How can anyone think it would be a fair, democratic process to count the votes in Michigan when Obama wasn't even on the ballot?

[TexasRealist]

Hillary supporters are as delusional as she is. She needs to stop now. She's got 177 delegates LESS than Obama and has NO hope of winning. Even if he hands her West Virginia as a gift (which he is), she still will be more than 140 delegates behind him.

[Bill]

ruth wrote:

<quoted text>
How can anyone think it would be a fair, democratic process to count the votes in Michigan when Obama wasn't even on the ballot?

Duh Ruth
Obama removed his name from the ballot. Now, who's fault is that?? If you are going to run for President, your name should/needs appear on each and every state that has a primary. Face it, Obama made a bad choice in removing his name from the Michigan ballot and should not be awarded any delegates from Michigan. That is the price you pay for your political decisions.

[ruth]

Bill wrote:

<quoted text>
Duh Ruth
Obama removed his name from the ballot. Now, who's fault is that?? If you are going to run for President, your name should/needs appear on each and every state that has a primary. Face it, Obama made a bad choice in removing his name from the Michigan ballot and should not be awarded any delegates from Michigan. That is the price you pay for your political decisions.

Michigan violated the Democratic party rules by changing its primary date. In compliance with the rules, Obama and 3 other candidates removed their names from the ballot, but Clinton did not. Consequently, people who went to the polls who wanted to vote for a candidate other than Clinton were not given the opportunity to do so. If Clinton is awarded all of the delegates from Michigan as a result, then those voters who did not want her were robbed of their voice. Some democracy!