Avoid SC Family Court Judge Segars-Andrews
Posted in the Anderson Forum
#1 Dec 3, 2009
She can not be trusted to be fair in any domestic case before her. If you have a case that is going before her, or any other motions or rules to be heard before her, by all means do what you can to have another judge preside.
Segars-Andrews has a well documented record of being biased, prejudice, and unqualified.
Twice (2x), the Judicial Merits Sellection Commission has ruled Segars-Andrews unqualified to be seated when her six year term expires next year.
#2 Dec 9, 2009
Well said , this judge is corrupt , biased and routinely orchestrates conflicted interests to her benefit.
#3 Jan 3, 2010
Looks to me with so much mudslinging, SC citizens should demand an audit- just like the recent one conducted in California. California State Senator Mark Leno did just that with the family courts in CA this past July. Makes perfect sense to me. If you have nothing to hide, then you should have nothing to fear.
If you're interested in reading more you can Google "Joint Committee Approves Senator Leno’s Family Court Audit Request" and that will get you started. It's also found on the Senator's webpage http://dist03.casen.govoffice.com/index.asp ... under "News Room" dated July 2, 2009.
#4 Feb 2, 2010
The improper and otherwise useless petition to keep Segars-Andrews on the bench continues to pointlessly collect signatories. It seems like a feel-good exercise for those who have issues with judicial accountability.
Well, maybe not all of the signers have problems seeing this thing for what it is:
5:28 am PST, Jan 28, Mercy Me, Washington D.C.
This petition looks like an illegal solicitation for public votes to a non-elective office.
26164 – SC Public Interest Foundation v. Judicial Merit Selection Commission
[…] the State Constitution, in unequivocal terms, vests the power to determine the qualifications for judicial candidates in the General Assembly. Were we to review this case, this Court would be delving into the decision making process of the very body that determines whether the members of this Court are qualified to seek election to the bench. We decline to put the judiciary in a position that would interfere with the selection of its very own members. Accordingly, we hold that the issue of whether Mullen was properly qualified is a nonjusticiable political question.[…]
#5 Mar 7, 2010
There is a major difference between “Disgruntled Litigant” and “Victim” and to classify all victims as disgruntled litigants is blatantly dishonest.
What about the "UNMARRIED" and "CHILDLESS" "WHITE" man who was "ILLEGALLY" halled into Charleston County family court on false allegations (87-DR-10-0294)?
He was "VERBALLY" alleged to have "VERBALLY" agreed to sign over his property to a "WHITE" woman who "FORGED" his name to a marriage license and directly pay her $200.00 per month for the support of her "ASIAN BASTARD"!
(Two Whites cannot make a Wong and these two Whites were never married!)
I later married that man (1999) and have been fighting the corruption and crimes in this case ever since (case file # 87-DR-10-0294).
My husband was never a “litigant”—he was never allowed to litigate anything.
He was always a “victim”.
Some of the crimes against him and me were directly committed by --- SEGARS-ANDREWS!!!
#6 Jun 5, 2010
yes, she should go. she can't make a decision on her own without looking to inexperienced solicitors.
#7 Jun 6, 2010
We have been fighting to get our grand-daughter out of a deployerable home for over a year. These were'nt the judge's. But there are other's just as bad as you say these are. It is unreal how these little innocent children have to suffer because of stupidity.Yet they can bring kid's from Haiti & they get adopted right away. Why does the one's born here have to suffer. it makes me madder then you know what. Out sider's get get more,& more done than the people that live here.WHY?
#8 Jun 9, 2010
LOL...you talk about "stupidity," yet your post looks like it was written by an 8 yr. old....LOL!
#10 Mar 24, 2013
Segars-Andrews was brought down by the people of SC. She was as bad as they come. Oh, she might have a nice smile and a soft voice, but her blood is poisoned with corruption.
She should be in federal prison with Paul Garfinkle.
Add your comments below
|Debate: Marijuana - Greenville, SC (Aug '10)||8 hr||Anna Kernells||143|
|Bob Inglis breaks from Republican Party, advoca...||21 hr||barefoot2626||10|
|Thinking of moving to Greenville SC (Feb '07)||Mon||nurse||311|
|why don't white males date black women (Jul '12)||Mar 22||old bf||49|
|looking for robin scheon||Mar 20||Ron from wv||1|
|Review: 911 Driving School||Mar 19||William Todd||2|
Find what you want!
Search Anderson Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC