Shooter Won't Face Charges Prosecutor says evidence points to...
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Daily Reporter.
#1 Oct 10, 2013
Everything is based on her word and she had everything to loose if they divorced. She gets everything now. He was a licensed gun collector and she had no reason to tell him police was on their way and would take them away. She should have let the police do their jobs.
#2 Oct 10, 2013
She saved many lives. Yes I like guns. But he had a unstable past. Some people are nut cases and need to be taken out. You have no clue. If they were to divorce she get half of everything. Not to mention who knows what happen to his gun collection. Did the police take it?
Add your comments below
|amanda lardon||Mon||whats new?||2|
|Who do you support for U.S. House in Indiana (D... (Oct '10)||Aug 3||IMHO||93|
|What Do You Think About Public School Dress Code? (Mar '07)||Jul '16||knowitall||119|
|Daleville Music Thread (Jun '12)||May '16||Musikologist||15|
|Baseball field (Feb '16)||Feb '16||Judy||1|
|the music thread (Jan '12)||Nov '15||Musikologist||57|
|Who do you support for U.S. House in Indiana (D... (Oct '10)||Oct '15||Yes||17|
Find what you want!
Search Anderson Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC