Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 Read more: www.cnn.com 201,862

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Read more

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163854 Oct 18, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
You are so clueless Rose. You are too stupid to even comprehend your own lies.
Are you this much of a joke in real life? My guess is you are.
Really? What lie did I tell?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163855 Oct 18, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's both have a go at her....
Be fine if she looked like her picture. But it's probably some fat old pervert dude in pink bra and panties. Maybe Rose_NoHo. Yecch.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163857 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Does "anal retentive" have a hyphen?
We know you don't like facts.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163858 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? What lie did I tell?
The one where you claimed to be educated.
Parkerfu

Shingle Springs, CA

#163859 Oct 18, 2012
Way to go!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163860 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Does "anal retentive" have a hyphen?
Writing your memoirs?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163864 Oct 18, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh...since you asked...
The question was: Does not society have a right to set certain standards, by which we all live ?
Not if those rules violate the basic equal rights of individuals.
R Hudson wrote:
Same-sex marriage proposes the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarity in marriage.
Hallmark crap. Marriage is a legal contract. Marriage is a right.
R Hudson wrote:
It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the perpetuation of the human race and the raising of children.
You don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.
R Hudson wrote:
Calling something marriage does not make it marriage. Marriage has always been a covenant between a man and a woman which is by its nature ordered toward the procreation and education of children and the unity and well being of the spouses.
Another is that it always denies a child either a father or a mother. It is in the child’s best interests that he be raised under the influence of his natural father and mother. This rule is confirmed by the evident difficulties faced by the many children who are orphans or are raised by a single parent, a relative, or a foster parent.
The unfortunate situation of these children will be the norm for all children of a same-sex “marriage.” A child of a same-sex “marriage” will always be deprived of either his natural mother or father. He will necessarily be raised by one party who has no blood relationship with him. He will always be deprived of either a mother or a father role model. Same-sex “marriage” ignores a child’s best interests.
Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

Gay couples can raise children without getting married.
R Hudson wrote:
Another is that, in the name of the “family,” same-sex “marriage” serves to validate not only such unions but the whole homosexual lifestyle in all its bisexual and transgender variants. Legal recognition of same-sex “marriage” would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.
What a bunch of BS.
R Hudson wrote:
The whole purpose of same-sex marriage , objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.
Again, stupid, you don't have to be able to procreate in order to marry.
R Hudson wrote:
By legalizing same-sex “marriage,” the State becomes its official and active promoter. The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children,
Rose's Law...
R Hudson wrote:
and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval. In the 1960s, society was pressured to accept all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women. Today we are seeing a new sexual revolution where society is being asked to accept sodomy and same-sex “marriage.” If homosexual “marriage” is universally accepted as the present step in sexual “freedom,” what logical arguments can be used to stop the next steps of incest, pedophilia, bestiality, and other forms of unnatural behavior? It is already being promoted as the next barrier to be bridged. Where does it end ?
Hope that answered your questions.......Because I cannot state it any more clearly than that. "Whew"
LOL. Slippery slope fallacy.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163866 Oct 18, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
The one where you claimed to be educated.
LOL. If you only knew...
I pass gas that is better educated than you are.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163868 Oct 18, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
We know you don't like facts.
No problem with facts. But you are just nit-picking, arguing semantics, and playing word games.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163871 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. If you only knew...
I pass gas that is better educated than you are.
We do know, you childish posts speak for themselves. But keep at it Rose, you will get that GED, I have faith in you.

And we know, when you pass gas it most certainly is the smartest thing in the room.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163872 Oct 18, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
So you produce ad hominem as a defense against the refutation of your claim ? That rape does not occur in nature ? I see you are again sidestepping, as you do so often, instead of admitting that you were erred. But think no more about it, it would only place you into an unrecoverable loop.
Your kitty porn site doesn't prove that animals have the concepts of consent and rape.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163873 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
No problem with facts. But you are just nit-picking, arguing semantics, and playing word games.
Pointing out something that was presented as Quote in fact wasn't, is not nit-picking, it is fact checking.

But most of the time you don't know fact from fantasy, so I understand why this concept is foreign to you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163874 Oct 18, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Kindly attempt to divert your limited attention to post #163847..If any of the bigger words confuse you, I will draw pictures....
I ripped that to shreds. You didn't make a single rational argument against gay marriage.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#163875 Oct 18, 2012
akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Pointing out something that was presented as Quote in fact wasn't, is not nit-picking, it is fact checking.
It's nit picking, just arguing semantics.
You do that because you don't have real arguments.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163877 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
It's nit picking, just arguing semantics.
You do that because you don't have real arguments.
Kind of like your nonsense about quoting the Declaration of Independence is presenting a "religious" argument.

You really are an idiot Rose.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#163878 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I ripped that to shreds. You didn't make a single rational argument against gay marriage.
The only thing you "rip to shreds" is common sense.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163879 Oct 18, 2012
R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
Jeez, Mike, give a guy a minute to get home and read his posts after 14 hours+ on the road....
She wouldn't do me anyway. Says I have gas. But it's not me, it's wafting over from Rose_NoHo's place. It's smart gas though.
milhouse

Los Angeles, CA

#163883 Oct 18, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
She wouldn't do me anyway. Says I'm too much of a queen because of the pink pleated skirt I like to wear and my silver colored lip gloss. That's how I roll.
So, you aren't the "masculine" leather kind of homosexual? You "swish" fem queero-sexuals are the worst kind of gay. Even the lesbians are higher up on the pecking order over types like you.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163886 Oct 18, 2012
Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
I ripped that to shreds. You didn't make a single rational argument against gay marriage.
Danth's Law.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#163888 Oct 18, 2012
milhouse wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you aren't the "masculine" leather kind of homosexual? You "swish" fem queero-sexuals are the worst kind of gay. Even the lesbians are higher up on the pecking order over types like you.
Nope. Not homosexual at all. Are you?

What kinds are there? You're the expert.

What a dope.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Anaheim Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Tree Falls On Car In Whittier; 2 Kids Hurt 17 min Joe Vhaney 3
News Striking: Hot, humid weather expected to linger (Aug '07) 3 hr Melvyn Doherty 9
News Stalker case leads to lawsuit against St. Bruno... (Feb '13) 4 hr tellinitlikeitis 1,326
News Albertsons out (Jul '08) 4 hr Skinny Johnson 40
Building Department 4 hr La Mirada Homeowner 4
News The leg end of Turnbull Canyon (Feb '08) 4 hr Joseph 189
News Sulfur-like smell covers Santa Fe Springs, surr... (Jul '13) 4 hr Harding 4
More from around the web

Anaheim People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]