"There has been lots of post showing the issues with the DA. You just choose to skip over those post" - No, I've read them, you just keep repeating yourself &still provide not much reason why I should believe what you say.<quoted text> see below please. your comments are in quotations followed by my response.
"An its real easy if you are tired of people assuming you are one of those people then just post your name, problem solved. Except I don't really think you are going to do that" - You're right, I'm not going to post my name. What's your name?
"An yes there are people that have posted they have seen these things he has done first hand. First hand would me to me that they seen it happen which would lead me to believe that is fact" - I will sort of give you credit for this one, because I have seen firsthand how he & people w/in the office have worked cases & haven't provided links to documents on these cases & I can't prove a lot of it. I don't expect you to take my word for it, I'm not going to give you documents, all you would have to do is check the records of cases tried by the ADA's around 00 & 02. But you're nuts if you think I am going to take your "firsthand" knowledge any more seriously than you are mine. But at the same time, I understand your experiences are different from mine. U have seen wrongdoing, I haven't. I get it, I really do.
"On the other hand you show no proof to dispute the accounts. You can't even give one fact that disputes any of the claims that have been made" - I will say this one more time: you show no proof of your accusations. Why should I go on a Mother Goose chase to find what YOU & OTHERS claim to be true? If you have proof, then where is it? I have said time & again that I CAN'T DISPROVE what you say, but you seem to not be able to PROVE what you say. Again: I HAVE NO, NONE, ZILCH, NADA FACTS TO DENY YOUR ALLEGATIONS THAT IS WHY I HAVE ASKED YOU FOR IT. But just like my situation, I understand there may not be "proof" for all of it, but for as much as is being said here, there has to be something to back some of it up, at least
"Instead of crying about people bashing you give us some facts that support your claim that he is such a great DA" - I haven't shed one tear about the radicals in this forum bashing me. Also, it's not hard to find cases where justice was served for both criminals & victims alike. I know that isn't good enough for you, but it will have to do for now. Plus, stop worrying about what I have and prove me wrong. You haven't completely convinced me yet.
"An I'm still waiting for someone to show me some facts that dispute any of the claims that have been posted on here" - & I'm still waiting for someone to show me the facts that say these claims are true.
"Here I will make it easy for everyone. I'm going to make a short list of things he has been accused of doing since he has been in office. All someone one has to do is prove they are not true" - How is this easy? Why do you refuse to prove that it is true? My guess is because you CAN'T.
"1. He has commited adultry several times since he has been in office." - Said the pot to kettle:'you must be sleeping with Burns to know this about him'. Also, what he does or doesn't do in his spare time should be of no concern, but hear me: I DON'T CONDONE ADULTERY but I also don't condone butting into others business in this fashion, especially since I am just spreading rumors. Now unless you were there, I assume you are repeating what you heard.
"2. Dismissed cases on people because of his political ties to people running for office in his district ie. Sheriff Races" - You should dig deeper. Perhaps they received probation, community svc, fines. That happens. Were NO repurcussions given? I understand there are many travesties of justice, I am not saying you are lying at all, but will you give some criminal names in these cases so that I can look them up? Pretty please?