First, never mind the prior post. I screwed that one up and hit send before realizing it wasn't the one I'd wanted to send. I know where Roe v Wade discussed states' interests in potential life. It's a bit chaotic here, but you probably don't care. Anyway, I screwed up and sent the wrong reply. Sorry.<quoted text>
Oh really ? THAT'S what it is ???
If you hurry you can catch your sense of humor before it gets away.
For crying out loud if you weren't going to answer the question couldn't you have said that in the first place instead of cutting and pasting all this crap that does nothing but repeat what everybody knows ?
If I wanted to speculate I would have done so. Instead I did what I thought was the right thing by giving you the opportunity to give your opinion. You of course, declined. But not before wasting everyone's time by cutting and pasting a slew of crap that is common knowledge
I never said they were equivalent. And I never said the pregnant woman should be discounted from the equation. The only thing I DID do was ask your opinion regarding what significance, if any, the fetus had, at any time, relative to the abortion issue.
How does a simple question put to you, come around to the PLM followers and what you think they are trying to do ?
What I wanted to point out was that BA had asked for my opinion before you came along and made that snarky reply to me. Why are you interested, if not to be snarky?
My answer stands as it did the first time I gave it. If it's not my pregnancy, not my embryo/fetus, it's not my business. Sure, even if the pregnancy is unwanted/unhealthy, if left alone, a baby will be born. How else can an embryo/fetus be relative to pregnancy/abortion? Were you expecting a different answer??