Yeah Badaxe NEVER brings the oppositions FAMILY in to the debate.<quoted text>And the basis for your argument is, and has been, that RvW defined viability, and/or the point of viability. And that's not true. SCOTUS affirmed what medicine defined. Not the opposite.
Badaxe wrote, "<quoted text>Where the F' do you get that I'm suggesting that artificial aide is a "requirement" of "viable"? It "includes" artificial aide, albeit- "not withstanding", not required. Come on man, that's as simple as a lawyer understanding that calling your wife a bitch does not constitute assault charges in Florida, oh sorry, I didn't mean to bring that up again."
So you're saying that a viable fetus can survive without any artificial aid?
BTW, keep the argument between you and me; ok? The only one who can bring my wife into the mix is me.
He has far to much honesty and integrity for that.