LA COP KILLER IS a LIBERAL

Since: Oct 08

.

#42 Feb 14, 2013
We use firearms for self-defense in preference to less effective tools. The need for effective, capable equipment is not unique to self-defense. For example, no one uses 1986 vintage computers and few people drive 1968 cars. No one claims that access to modern computers should be restricted to deter hackers or that prohibiting new car models would reduce the number of deliberate hit-and-run accidents.

Yet much of the effort by the perpetrators of gun control has been to deny the rest of use safe, effective and well-designed guns. For example, one of the handgun features restricted in 1994 was called ventilated barrel shroud. That fancy term means simply the handguard which keeps the operator of a pistol from getting her hands burned. Can you think of any other tool on which a safety feature like that is prohibited by law?

Clearly, our safety is not a concern for the prohibitionists. What they want is to reduce our ability to defend ourselves. Some sick people get off on being in control of others. Some turn to rape and battery to satisfy their urges, others run for Congress. The sentiment which governs the two groups is identical: desire to be in control of others. Just as rape is more about control than it is about procreation, so gun banning is about social control and not about public safety.
Guns are Bad

Alamogordo, NM

#44 Feb 15, 2013
Skuttlebutt wrote:
We use firearms for self-defense in preference to less effective tools. The need for effective, capable equipment is not unique to self-defense. For example, no one uses 1986 vintage computers and few people drive 1968 cars. No one claims that access to modern computers should be restricted to deter hackers or that prohibiting new car models would reduce the number of deliberate hit-and-run accidents.
Yet much of the effort by the perpetrators of gun control has been to deny the rest of use safe, effective and well-designed guns. For example, one of the handgun features restricted in 1994 was called ventilated barrel shroud. That fancy term means simply the handguard which keeps the operator of a pistol from getting her hands burned. Can you think of any other tool on which a safety feature like that is prohibited by law?
Clearly, our safety is not a concern for the prohibitionists. What they want is to reduce our ability to defend ourselves. Some sick people get off on being in control of others. Some turn to rape and battery to satisfy their urges, others run for Congress. The sentiment which governs the two groups is identical: desire to be in control of others. Just as rape is more about control than it is about procreation, so gun banning is about social control and not about public safety.
Nothing you stated above proves you NEED a gun. YOU do not NEED a gun. Protectors of America knows who you are and where you are 24/7..
Reflections

White Oak, TX

#45 Feb 15, 2013
Skuttlebutt wrote:
We use firearms for self-defense in preference to less effective tools. The need for effective, capable equipment is not unique to self-defense. For example, no one uses 1986 vintage computers and few people drive 1968 cars. No one claims that access to modern computers should be restricted to deter hackers or that prohibiting new car models would reduce the number of deliberate hit-and-run accidents.
Yet much of the effort by the perpetrators of gun control has been to deny the rest of use safe, effective and well-designed guns. For example, one of the handgun features restricted in 1994 was called ventilated barrel shroud. That fancy term means simply the handguard which keeps the operator of a pistol from getting her hands burned. Can you think of any other tool on which a safety feature like that is prohibited by law?
Clearly, our safety is not a concern for the prohibitionists. What they want is to reduce our ability to defend ourselves. Some sick people get off on being in control of others. Some turn to rape and battery to satisfy their urges, others run for Congress. The sentiment which governs the two groups is identical: desire to be in control of others. Just as rape is more about control than it is about procreation, so gun banning is about social control and not about public safety.
Sleeping with both a man and a woman is the only way you will truly know which one you like, you dumb sack of shit. It is about procreation or the removal of guns for gun tote n loons.
Guns are Bad

Alamogordo, NM

#46 Feb 15, 2013
guns are guns

Alamogordo, NM

#47 Feb 15, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>Nothing you stated above proves you NEED a gun. YOU do not NEED a gun. Protectors of America knows who you are and where you are 24/7..
Your just another utopianist, an idealist. Preaching perfection in a world cracked by biblical implications. Anyone who believes in a self contrived perfection is an extremist. Pursuing a unworkable goal.
That is what you are calling for, a world without guns. Not going to happen. You just think it makes you sound clean and pure. But you are just like a young pregnant girl talking about abstinence and hoping that some act of retribution will make her a virgin again.
Not going to happen.
Guns are Bad

Alamogordo, NM

#48 Feb 15, 2013
guns are guns wrote:
<quoted text>
Your just another utopianist, an idealist. Preaching perfection in a world cracked by biblical implications. Anyone who believes in a self contrived perfection is an extremist. Pursuing a unworkable goal.
That is what you are calling for, a world without guns. Not going to happen. You just think it makes you sound clean and pure. But you are just like a young pregnant girl talking about abstinence and hoping that some act of retribution will make her a virgin again.
Not going to happen.
OK virgin boy tell me why you NEED a gun? Let's have a civil debate here. Why do you need a gun?
guns are guns

Alamogordo, NM

#49 Feb 15, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>OK virgin boy tell me why you NEED a gun? Let's have a civil debate here. Why do you need a gun?
Seriously.......... are you really this much of a dipshite?

You certainly like to fight alot for a pacifist.
Did you obviously not read the part that says you are arguing an unacquirable goal?

I don't need a gun at this very moment but as long as there is a N. Korea thriving somewhere on this planet, we had better keep some clean and oiled guns somewhere near by.
You can continue having your very own massdebate now.
Before we ENTER

Alamogordo, NM

#50 Feb 15, 2013
guns are guns wrote:
<quoted text>
Seriously.......... are you really this much of a dipshite?
You certainly like to fight alot for a pacifist.
Did you obviously not read the part that says you are arguing an unacquirable goal?
I don't need a gun at this very moment but as long as there is a N. Korea thriving somewhere on this planet, we had better keep some clean and oiled guns somewhere near by.
You can continue having your very own massdebate now.
maybe we should knock firs..

do you ever grow tired

Alamogordo, NM

#51 Feb 15, 2013
of placing icons above your own postings? Sort of defeats the purpose if you rate your own ignorance.
Just my opinion.
Guns are Bad

Alamogordo, NM

#52 Feb 16, 2013
do you ever grow tired wrote:
of placing icons above your own postings? Sort of defeats the purpose if you rate your own ignorance.
Just my opinion.
Protectors of America never get tired of doing what is right..
patrick

Tularosa, NM

#54 Feb 16, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>Protectors of America never get tired of doing what is right..
Are you getting paid by Obummer and the bumbocrats to spew your drivel?
Guns are Bad

Alamogordo, NM

#55 Feb 16, 2013
patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you getting paid by Obummer and the bumbocrats to spew your drivel?
No sir..
patrick

Tularosa, NM

#56 Feb 16, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>No sir..
So you don't deny its drivel?
to bad for you

Alamogordo, NM

#57 Feb 16, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>Protectors of America never get tired of doing what is right..
that it is an endless history of guns that acquired you the right to be such a self proclaimed loud mouthed jerk!
to bad for you

Alamogordo, NM

#58 Feb 16, 2013
that all your squawking won't stop a single person from making a Molotov Cocktail. Timothy McVeigh very likely never wielded a weapon. Try studying the history of Ireland in modern day and then shut up.
to bad for you

Alamogordo, NM

#59 Feb 16, 2013
Guns are Bad wrote:
<quoted text>No sir..
that you are an extremest and we all know that is not healthy for our nation.
Bill C

Cloudcroft, NM

#60 Feb 16, 2013
do you ever grow tired wrote:
of placing icons above your own postings? Sort of defeats the purpose if you rate your own ignorance.
Just my opinion.
one cannot do this anyway. you should know, you tried and tried.
even a fool

Alamogordo, NM

#61 Feb 16, 2013
Bill C wrote:
<quoted text>
one cannot do this anyway. you should know, you tried and tried.
can be thought wise if he keeps his Bill shut.
Flamingo del la grase

Maumelle, AR

#62 Feb 16, 2013
to bad for you wrote:
<quoted text>
that you are an extremest and we all know that is not healthy for our nation.
What is not healthy for our nation is a country that didn't get on their knees and pray for the Sandy Hook victims.

And for the Atheist, a moment of silent reverence for the innocent blood that was shed.
to bad so sad

Alamogordo, NM

#63 Feb 17, 2013
Flamingo del la grase wrote:
<quoted text>
What is not healthy for our nation is a country that didn't get on their knees and pray for the Sandy Hook victims.
And for the Atheist, a moment of silent reverence for the innocent blood that was shed.
And what is with the thought that an atheist now has reverence for anything. God is the only anything in the universe that places value on mankind. Otherwise you are eat or be eaten. The more the God of Jesus is eradicated the less humanity has value. That is without question why so many cling to the bible. Without it we live in a dog eat dog world. Guaranteed.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Alamogordo Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Trump is doing it ! 4 hr Censorship 6
Mad Dog 5 hr Censorship 68
What is coming out of the swamp. 8 hr Nope 12
Why ? 10 hr Laughing 39
Fire Chief 13 hr Ralph 3
white Sands Bistro 13 hr Ralph 16
Free US Constitution for Ralph 15 hr Ralph 2

Alamogordo Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Alamogordo Mortgages