Local news: Adrian, MI  (change)

 | 

Join the Topix community today: 

Sign Up

 | 

Sign In

Advertisment
Adrian, MI

Bill Clinton is a Big, Fat Liar

In response to Bill Clinton's furious interview with smirky Chris Wallace on FoxNews Sunday, Condoleezza Rice has some explosive things to say about Clinton in this morning's New York Post.

Read All 79 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 20 of 79
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
notasitseems
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Sep 26, 2006
 
You could tell he was fibbing when he kept covering his mouth with his hand. The second area that is a "tell" is when he starts pointing the finger for emphasis. His eyes also give him away, that "momentary deer in the headlights" look. The biggest "tell" of all is when he gets red faced and becomes aggressive. He would be great to play poker with.
Wellington
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Sep 26, 2006
 
Bill Clinton's capacity for veracity on a scale of one to ten would be about a negative three. He's proved himself to be a chronic liar since his early days in Arkansas. Those who would believe him are foolish or worse. I accept nothing he says until it is independently confirmed.
lou ramsey
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Sep 26, 2006
 
WHO READS THE NEW YORK POST????????
lou ramsey
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Sep 26, 2006
 
WHO'S A BIGGER LIAR THAN BUSH??????
Bernard
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Sep 26, 2006
 
George Bush's capacity for veracity on a scale of one to ten would be about a negative four hundred. When this man lies people die. He has not told the truth about the war in Iraq. He has not found Osama and is not looking. He remains cozey with the Saudis who have financed this 9/11 fiasco. The only thing Clinton ever lied about was his sex life. Bush lies about EVERYTHING...Cheney...Rumsfeld ..Powell...Rice...none of these people can be trusted to tell the truth about anything...Must be part of the republican party platform. Tell only Lies
J Sanders
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Sep 26, 2006
 
lou ramsey wrote:
WHO READS THE NEW YORK POST????????
People who can't find the NY Times?
rob maspeth
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Sep 26, 2006
 
lou ramsey wrote:
WHO'S A BIGGER LIAR THAN BUSH??????
all the democrats thats who,clinton is the liar in chief.
leopolis treeman
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Sep 26, 2006
 
Bernard wrote:
George Bush's capacity for veracity on a scale of one to ten would be about a negative four hundred. When this man lies people die. He has not told the truth about the war in Iraq. He has not found Osama and is not looking. He remains cozey with the Saudis who have financed this 9/11 fiasco. The only thing Clinton ever lied about was his sex life. Bush lies about EVERYTHING...Cheney...Rumsfeld ..Powell...Rice...none of these people can be trusted to tell the truth about anything...Must be part of the republican party platform. Tell only Lies
The pigeons on my silo are spying on me and reporting back to George Bush--- COME ON!! Quit being so paranoid! Open up your mind and THINK for yourself. Don't let the almighty GOD--TELEVISION--rule you and fool you.
steve
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Sep 26, 2006
 
Take a few minutes for a fair and balanced perspective: http://video.google.com/videoplay...
kiet
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Sep 26, 2006
 
The former president, Clinton, may not told the true about his sexual relation with other woman. Who's care? nobody's business any way. After thousands U.S soldier has been killed in Iraq, hundreds of billions has beeen wasted, and oh... where is the WMD???? HMMMM... who is telling the true here... when we compare the former president with the sitting president, boy..... Mr. Clinton is a very decent man and far more intelligence than Mr. Bush.
jnyangel
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Sep 26, 2006
 
bubba tells the truth, GW does not know what is going on. If you thought those in Iraq would actually meet our troops with candies and flowers as this administration declared would be the case, you are all fools. you have no understanding why the British lost 18000 army personnel when they "controlled" Iraq. The problem was that they never controled the Anbar province area and they made a country out of a merid of tribes with differing warlords. If you want to win the war in Iraq, you should be shouting for the use of gas/air bombs over those cities where we are receiving car bombs and IEDs. Remember Dresden, Strasberg, Nagasaki, and others. If we are at war, we must fight as though we are at war. this means that there is nothing called "collateral damage." the populace are the enemy. they must be destroyed. we should be bombing the rubble, killing everyone in these areas. I know this feels like something we Americans would not do, however we must recognize that we are facing a threat to our basic principles. We must use every weapon we have to wipe out the threat. We must fight this threat in the same way we did in WW2. We must flatten every city where there are any of these Islamic facists types. We must not care that there are men, women and children who think that Islam by the sword is the way to go. We must eliminate those thinkers.
Snow
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#12
Sep 27, 2006
 
lou ramsey wrote:
WHO'S A BIGGER LIAR THAN BUSH??????
Uh where is monica
Sher Gill
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Sep 27, 2006
 
notasitseems wrote:
You could tell he was fibbing when he kept covering his mouth with his hand. The second area that is a "tell" is when he starts pointing the finger for emphasis. His eyes also give him away, that "momentary deer in the headlights" look. The biggest "tell" of all is when he gets red faced and becomes aggressive. He would be great to play poker with.
It is clear that your interpretation skills need significant refinements.
Also, you are clearly anti-Clinton.
Well done for expressing your feelings by blaming someone else. Mr. Clinton was elected twice as president. I am sure you could write a book about the American Voters. Have a go, bud.
Snow
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Sep 27, 2006
 
Sher Gill wrote:
<quoted text>
It is clear that your interpretation skills need significant refinements.
Also, you are clearly anti-Clinton.
Well done for expressing your feelings by blaming someone else. Mr. Clinton was elected twice as president. I am sure you could write a book about the American Voters. Have a go, bud.
You don't know anything about my skills.I said nothing about
Clinton.You have a go yourself.
Fox
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Sep 27, 2006
 
Bernard wrote:
George Bush's capacity for veracity on a scale of one to ten would be about a negative four hundred. When this man lies people die. He has not told the truth about the war in Iraq. He has not found Osama and is not looking. He remains cozey with the Saudis who have financed this 9/11 fiasco. The only thing Clinton ever lied about was his sex life. Bush lies about EVERYTHING...Cheney...Rumsfeld ..Powell...Rice...none of these people can be trusted to tell the truth about anything...Must be part of the republican party platform. Tell only Lies
So when Clinton was in office nobody died? On July 20 1993 Vince Foster was found very dead in Ft. Marcy Park shot through the head. There was no blood on the scene and after he allegedly blew his head off, he wiped the gun clean and threw it into the brush.
notasitseems
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Sep 27, 2006
 
Sher Gill wrote:
<quoted text>
It is clear that your interpretation skills need significant refinements.
Also, you are clearly anti-Clinton.
Well done for expressing your feelings by blaming someone else. Mr. Clinton was elected twice as president. I am sure you could write a book about the American Voters. Have a go, bud.
Strictly my interpretation of what I observed during the interview. Your interpretation of my motives for expressing my opinion is highly biased. No where in my pointed critique of the former president did I blame someone else. You are paranoid in your rush to defend an obvious liar.
Wellington
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#17
Sep 27, 2006
 
Bernard wrote:
George Bush's capacity for veracity on a scale of one to ten would be about a negative four hundred. When this man lies people die. He has not told the truth about the war in Iraq. He has not found Osama and is not looking. He remains cozey with the Saudis who have financed this 9/11 fiasco. The only thing Clinton ever lied about was his sex life. Bush lies about EVERYTHING...Cheney...Rumsfeld ..Powell...Rice...none of these people can be trusted to tell the truth about anything...Must be part of the republican party platform. Tell only Lies
You cannot give me one concrete example, backed up by solid evidence, of a lie by George W. Bush. Your comments are hysterical---and wrong. As for Clinton lying about nothing but his sex life, I would suggest you look at the very long record which is there for everyone to see. For instance, Clinton (and his wife) claimed they didn't know Jim McDougall was paying their half of the mortgage (as well as his half) on the Whitewater real estate venture for a full seven years. This is not credible in the least. The Clintons were partners with McDougall in the Whitewater real estate endeavor. It is untenable in the extreme to maintain that when one takes out a mortagage on any property, as the Clintons did, it could naturally follow that such a person could rightly conclude that no payments were due. This is EXACTLY the kind of nonsense the Clintons want dupes like yourself to swallow. Clinton's lies are legion. Apparently you remain clueless to this day about them.
notasitseems
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Sep 28, 2006
 
The Clintons are now in the process of rewritting their history. They want to control what people remember so they at every opportuntity will contest and attempt to change perceptions of what happened in the past. This is why they applied so much pressure on ABC for the 9/11 drama and why he lost his temper with Wallace during the question and answer session.
jujubeanny
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Sep 29, 2006
 
Clinton isn't a liar. He has told lies and admitted them publicly, which is a helluva lot more than you can say for most people. Everyone tells lies but most are cowards and dont admit it. As far as body language like covering his mouth and pointing, only a moron would think that indicates lying. He covered his mouth to be prepared for the expected bad questions that FOX is known for. He knew that. He pointed because he's not afraid. It's like he said, if people are afraid they'll vote for the war mongers, but if people stand up and not be cowards they will give dems a chance to prove.
notasitseems
|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Sep 29, 2006
 
jujubeanny wrote:
Clinton isn't a liar. He has told lies and admitted them publicly, which is a helluva lot more than you can say for most people. Everyone tells lies but most are cowards and dont admit it. As far as body language like covering his mouth and pointing, only a moron would think that indicates lying. He covered his mouth to be prepared for the expected bad questions that FOX is known for. He knew that. He pointed because he's not afraid. It's like he said, if people are afraid they'll vote for the war mongers, but if people stand up and not be cowards they will give dems a chance to prove.
You contradict yourself ! "Clinton isn't a liar. He has told lies and admitted them publicly, which is a helluva lot more than you can say for most people." For your info, a liar is a liar even it he admits telling a lie. Most people are not the President and you expect more from one holding that position. Tells one lie and the rest get easier and easier.
As to covering his mouth when he talks, ask a police interrogator if that is not a sign of deception. Finger pointing for emphasis can get your fingers broken in a heated exchange. Very bad attempt to convince others of your honesty.
Showing posts 1 - 20 of 79
« prev | next »
Go to last post | Jump to page:
Type in your comments to post to the forum
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Adrian Discussions
Topic Updated Last By Comments
trying to find obituary Jul 20 Debbie 1
Redford Township may not be among nation's safe... (from Sep '06) Jul 18 Joe Schmoe-R... 83
Family blames death on faulty railroad crossing (from Oct '07) Jul 18 midwest rail 276
Don't Move Firewood This Summer Jul 3 Greg 1
Attorney: Teacher's chat inappropriate, not crime (from Dec '07) Jun 30 Sister 3
Driver Faces Sentencing For Killing 5 From Md. Jun 29 Kalamazoo 3
Drunken driver gets 43 years for killing mom, kids Jun 28 mom of two 2
Related Topix Forums: Terrorism, Top Stories in the Blogosphere, Condoleezza Rice