Oh, so we are going to look to need, when deciding what rights folks should have. Okay how about this:No one needs an assault rifle. So I'll agree with that.
Absent where the mother's life is at risk, almost no one needs an abortion.
Yet women can still get them, EVEN THOUGH there is nothing in the constitution expressly saying women have the right to an abortion.
How can it be that women can have unfettered access to a non-constitutionally guaranteed act even when there is no need, but a constitutionally guaranteed right to bear arms is only applicable where there is a need for that right?
Given this, certainly need cannot be the standard that determines what folk's rights are. Try again Toj and Angela.