Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1497186 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Get RIGHT or be left”

Since: Nov 07

www.dreamindemon.com

#776470 Oct 18, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Household net worth fell from 2007 to 2009 by a total of $17.5 trillion or 25.5%. Thank you housing collapse & Bush recession. It had been gaining since.
I see you neglected to tell us which 4 years you were talking about. Accident? Or are you just another lying right whiner POS?
Here, look at the f*cking graph.
http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/09/news/economy/...
So really,thank you George Bush for losing all that wealth for us.
And thank you Barack Obama for getting it back.
Yes, LIBERAL RINO Bush did that!

And Obama has all the same policies!

Obama = Bush!

Hope and Change in 2012.

Dump ABJECT FAILURE Bush/Obama!
carol

Orlando, FL

#776471 Oct 18, 2012
Homer wrote:
I give up.
Good...finally.

Now think of something else to talk about that doesn't make you look so out of the loop.
gerbilLNyerBUTT

Haslet, TX

#776472 Oct 18, 2012
THE DEBIL wrote:
<quoted text>
UH-HUH. UM, HARD TO SEE WHAT LOOK YOU GOIN' FO' HERE? YOU TELL DEBIL MO' FIRST, THEN, AFTER HE PULL YOU PANTIES DOWN AN' ASS-RAPE YOU A FEW TIMES, MAYBE HE TELL YOU SECRET OF LIFE, WHICH INVOLVES HOW TO SURVIVE AN' REBUILD YOU DIGNITY AFTER YOU BEEN ASS-RAPED BY THE DEBIL.
You are a dum one....
You know many gerbils that wear underwear?

Ima a boy gerbil which means you a homo!
On a lighter note....

Thanks to your lips my micronuts are clean!
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#776473 Oct 18, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe Leo remembers the 'procedure' she claims healed brain damage.
I was too busy laughing.
How much hair do you have growing out of your ears?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#776474 Oct 18, 2012
Informer wrote:
I find it amazing how people actually believe that ANY president can change ANYTHING. The republicans shoot down anything that a democrats come up with, and vice versa . No matter how good of an idea it is, or how good it would be for the American public.
Blaming Obama for the mess we are in is utterly stupid, and confirms that the general public is made up of people that can't think on their own.
People argue over how good, or bad they think Obama is based on election commercials, and what their friends tell them about him......ya gotta love it.
Things will never change, no matter WHO is the president.
It is wrong to blame Obama for anything that our government does.
For Obama to have done something wrong, he would have actually had to do something.
What's wrong is the people making all the decisions using Obama as cover sitting in the Oval Office and making it look as if we actually have a president.
Soon, we'll actually have a president again.
Phil

Saint Louis, MO

#776477 Oct 18, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Phil and Homer are in serious denial and apparently really do believe no woman would ever accuse a man falsely of rape.
I don't live in denial. Maybe men should really get to know the women they are sleeping (consenually) with to avoid having this situation happen to them.
Morons4Mitt

Rochester, KY

#776478 Oct 18, 2012
KetchupFreedomRights wrote:
<quoted text>
Translate: we the duhmocrapTic entitlMENTALLy disabled, have yet to figure out, Bush is NO longer on the ballots!
You-table four. Commie ketchup bottle herd pack lickers. Third shackles and chain in. NO whining or regurgitating anymore "duh one point duh --uh..we don't got no plan so...duh rich are evile!" camplaigner whining either. You'll cause a spike that cannot be met-due to commie veto groveling of ingrediants required in the demand for production of ignoRANT blocking earplugs!
ROMNEY/RYAN 2012
REAL Experience for ALL of America again!
If we Democrats did not remind you Repubs what it was like for America when it was losing 750,000 jobs per month you might elect someone that would have the same ideas and do it all over.
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#776479 Oct 18, 2012
Phil wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, false accusations happen all the time. Especially in Politics.
Democrats are trend setters in this area.
carol

Orlando, FL

#776480 Oct 18, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
That's horrible, Were the rapists prosecuted?
I agree with Carol that there are the possibilities of cases that are not rape but an act of revenge. It does happen, sad to say, because then this makes it bad for the real rape victims.
Rape is a hard thing to prosecute, it's usually a he said, she said scenario, with no witnesses. Unless there is evidence of brute violence and dna, it can be tough to prove, especially if it is a date rape situation.
Thank you for having a grasp on reality, Lily.

Unfortunately, false accusations do happen. But that was the whole point behind that lawmaker telling the story about his father warning him about having sex.

Homer was terribly offended because he left out the word "cry" before "rape so easily" ignoring the whole context of what he said.
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#776481 Oct 18, 2012
Why is Obama losing?
gerbilLNyerBUTT

Haslet, TX

#776482 Oct 18, 2012
leosnana wrote:
<quoted text>That would be "bear" not "bare" repeating, and it doesn't...what might be noteworthy in an eighteen-year-old study would be the number of false accusers, not the commonality of their motives.
Can you help me spell gerbilnyo b u t t?

Its important to that debil wacko...he be needn help!

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#776484 Oct 18, 2012
Nobama wrote:
<quoted text>
another leftwing homophobe....
Hussein Obama supporters, the Chicago bathhouse boy, are the last ones who should be making references to the homosexual tendencies of their leaders.....
I called Romney a chickenshit chickenhawk--no homophobic reference there. I notice with the "bathhouse boy" you managed to double down homophobia and racism--not a pretty sight...
Lord Fetch

United States

#776485 Oct 18, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> two different things there Dave. The police gather evidence, make arrests and hold the suspects for trial. They do not prevent most crime. That is one of the reasons we have the second amendment. Ask any policeperson. They will tell you.
if that's the case then why are there squads out on patrol? your description makes it sound like all cops are detectives and csi techs that only solve crimes after the fact.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#776487 Oct 18, 2012
This from Exxon after the first presidential debate:

October 4, 2012
To hear President Barack Obama in last night’s first presidential debate, you would think he was running against ExxonMobil this November given his tendency to single us out for criticism.
In a discussion of ways to address the federal deficit, the president repeated incorrect claims that ExxonMobil receives what he termed “corporate welfare.”
Because we’ve been pulled into this debate, I feel like asking the moderator to let me respond with several points.
The first is that ExxonMobil receives no special treatment in the U.S. tax code.
What the president often calls subsidies for “Big Oil” are legitimate tax provisions that apply to virtually all American manufacturers and producers. In fact, companies like ExxonMobil actually are specifically disadvantaged: The oil and gas industry deduction under section 199 of the tax code, for instance, is lower than the deduction allowed for nearly all other U.S. manufacturers.
The president has said he wants to remove these provisions for the oil and gas industry entirely – a punitive proposal that would do nothing except raise the cost of producing the energy that America needs to support economic recovery.

2011 Exxon earnings in the US 9.6 billion dollars
2011 Exxon taxes to US government 12.3 billion dollars

Keep in mind, too, that ExxonMobil’s U.S. tax expense amounts to more than $1 billion per month. In 2011, our total U.S. taxes of $12.3 billion exceeded our U.S. earnings by almost $3 billion, and our effective income tax rate in the U.S. was 31.4 percent – far higher than many critics have claimed. We are a large corporation with a disciplined business approach that has generated substantial earnings for our shareholders as well as energy for millions of U.S. consumers. Our earnings may be large – but so are our taxes.
Finally, there’s one more thing we do with the money we earn: We re-invest it. ExxonMobil plans to spend close to $37 billion for each of the next five years on forward-looking projects to develop the energy supplies the world will need in the decades to come.
Much of that money will be spent right here in the United States, which is why the Progressive Policy Institute recently hailed ExxonMobil as an “Investment Hero“ for our substantial U.S. capital investments.
Misleading attacks on oil companies like ExxonMobil have become a staple of some candidates during election time. And while such an approach may produce sound bites for the evening news, they do nothing to provide voters with the fundamental facts about the U.S. energy industry or the many ways we contribute to our nation’s economic growth, public treasury and international competitiveness. Thank you
Lord Fetch

United States

#776488 Oct 18, 2012
gerbilLNyerBUTT wrote:
<quoted text>

Thanks to your lips my micronuts are clean!
you said it

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#776489 Oct 18, 2012
Lily Boca Raton FL wrote:
<quoted text>
And now that red light cameras are going up everywhere, the cameras snap the photo, you get ticket in mail. Who needs cops anymore? They'll probably make cars that can't go over the speed limit and not start if the person is drunk. Fire the cops.
That's about 5 years away. Both. Actually there will be speed strips like NASCAR uses to determine position. There will be transponders with license information on the car. I believe it was Texas that passed a law stating all new cars sold after , forget the year, must have the sensors in the car. If I get a chance I will look it up.
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#776491 Oct 18, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> two different things there Dave. The police gather evidence, make arrests and hold the suspects for trial. They do not prevent most crime. That is one of the reasons we have the second amendment. Ask any policeperson. They will tell you.
How about all the police who while away hours ensnaring sex offenders on line or those who operate radar or visual speed and seat belt traps. How about the DUI roadblocks or those who simply sit outside popular nightspots or billiard lounges and just wait for easy pickins around closing time. How about the marine patrol who call boaters out for no reason whatsoever and conduct searches under the guise of safety inspections. I could fill up three pages of topix with cops behaving proactively as opposed to reactively Flacko and barely scratch the surface.
carol

Orlando, FL

#776492 Oct 18, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree 100 percent.
Our biggest problem is we have so many people that actually realize this, but pretend to not know.
Almost every Obamabot poster herre falls into that category.
On here maybe but not necessarily in the real world. Even in an MSNBC focus group, half the audience acknowledged they were switching over to Romney after the second debate. They represent a whole lot of other people.

And the last debate is on foreign policy.
gerbilLNyerBUTT

Haslet, TX

#776493 Oct 18, 2012
THE DEBIL wrote:
<quoted text>
UH-HUH, MAYBE SO. WHAT DOOM YOU EFFORTS TO FAILURE, HOWEVER, IS YOU PENCHANT FO' THE WORD,'SAMBO.' DEBIL PERPLEXED THAT YOU NOT ABLE TO SEE THIS WITHOUT HIS EXPENSIVE HELP? DEBIL SAY, "EXPENSIVE" CAUSE YOU GONNA PAY DEARLY FO' YOU LACK OF HUMILITY AN'u UNDERSTANDIN' OF THE HUMAN CONDITION.
What makes your stupid a$ d an expert on the human condition?
You need to get your head out from Obamas sphincter first...it must stink....

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#776494 Oct 18, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
A woman who is a nurse is going to make less than a male who is a computer programmer.
It's not that, cough, hard to understand.
Obama made a huge mistake by not clarifying this. Fortunately, enough lawyers did. Look it up if you even care enough about the truth.
Invalid analogy, dumb carol...a male nurse usually does make more than a female nurse; programmers tend to be treated more equally.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Addison Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 9 min Sublime1 105,004
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 19 min Jacques Ottawa 237,635
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 19 min Patriot AKA Bozo 63,302
Are democrats destroyed? 52 min Dixiecrat 318
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 10,353
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 1 hr RACE 3,601
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr RACE 2,466

Addison Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Addison Mortgages