UN rights expert accuses Israel of 'e...

UN rights expert accuses Israel of 'ethnic cleansing' in treatment of Palestinians

There are 2168 comments on the Bellingham Herald story from Mar 21, 2014, titled UN rights expert accuses Israel of 'ethnic cleansing' in treatment of Palestinians. In it, Bellingham Herald reports that:

He spoke against a backdrop of deadlocked peace talks and accelerating Israeli settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem which Palestinians say is dimming their hope of establishing a viable state on contiguous territory.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Bellingham Herald.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2095 Sep 4, 2014
Abdurratln wrote:
<quoted text>
Judaism was the first? Well, another ignorant POS has spoken. If Judaism was first, what was Moses' religion? And there was Noah before Moses. What was Noah's religion? What was Adam and Eve's religion? It was w3as not Judaism. The biggest idiot on earth can see it was not Judaism.
Abraham was the first Jew. Noah, Adam and Eve were prior to Abraham. Moses was post Abraham and thus a Jew.

You qualify as the biggest idiot.

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#2096 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Abraham was the first Jew. Noah, Adam and Eve were prior to Abraham. Moses was post Abraham and thus a Jew.
You qualify as the biggest idiot.
The tem Jew comes from a member of the house of Judah, the southern kingdom. Abraham and Moses were not Jewish, they were Hebrew but they practiced what would later become Judaism.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2097 Sep 4, 2014
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>The tem Jew comes from a member of the house of Judah, the southern kingdom. Abraham and Moses were not Jewish, they were Hebrew but they practiced what would later become Judaism.
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Mandela

Baldivis, Australia

#2098 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Bull Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet

Hebrew woz a race

Jewish = judaism = religion - but now its been hijacked by zionist banksters

>
>

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2099 Sep 4, 2014
Mandela wrote:
<quoted text>
Bull Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet
Hebrew woz a race
Jewish = judaism = religion - but now its been hijacked by zionist banksters
>
>
FYI...

Jewish is an ethnicity... Judaism a religion

You are a racist

Since: Aug 14

Powhatan, VA

#2100 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
Where's credible source for that Brain Bubble

Just remember, today's modern day Jews in Israel have absolutely no genetic connection to the Ancient Hebrews who may have briefly occupied Canaan

“New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine!“http://socioecohist ory.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/n ew-genome-study-destroys-zioni st-claims-to-palestine-koestle rs-khazar-history-vindicated-z ionists-design-myth-of-jewish- genome-to-usurp-palestine/
“ EXCERPT On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.
-
But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
-
How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik,“First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.
-
But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.
-
They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood.
-
They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.”CONTINUED

The politically motivated Zionist geneticist you cited refuses to show his work and has the unique caveat that his findings would be of a "......non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.”

“Did YU's Harry Ostrer Cook The Genetic Books To Support False Findings Of Ashkenazi Jews Origins?”
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messi...

EXCERPTS "Ostrer replied that the data are not publicly available.

“Criteria for reviewing include novelty and strength of the proposal, non-overlap with current or planned activities, and non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.” That last requirement, Elhaik argues, reveals the bias of Ostrer and his collaborators." CONTINUED
________

That was only ONE of the many times I've debunked your Hasbara nonsense

So, where's your credible source for: "Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage"

What about the millions of Jewish converts over the years.

You're saying that if an Eskimo converts to Judaism that means his ancestors are suddenly Hebrews.

Try again

Since: Aug 14

Powhatan, VA

#2101 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage
I think that with that Brain Bubble you'd be more careful who call an "Idiot"

Now would be a good time to use your Rule # 13

“Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2102 Sep 4, 2014
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
Where's credible source for that Brain Bubble
Just remember, today's modern day Jews in Israel have absolutely no genetic connection to the Ancient Hebrews who may have briefly occupied Canaan
“New Genome Study Destroys Zionist Claims to Palestine!“http://socioecohist ory.wordpress.com/2013/03/04/n ew-genome-study-destroys-zioni st-claims-to-palestine-koestle rs-khazar-history-vindicated-z ionists-design-myth-of-jewish- genome-to-usurp-palestine/
“ EXCERPT On December 14, 2012, Dr. Eran Elhaik turned almost two generations of Jewish genome research upside down.
-
But he went even further. The young Israeli-American geneticist has charged former researchers with academic fraud, and he has the research to back it up.
-
How could those those eminent Jewish scientist before him have been so wrong? Easy says Dr. Elhaik,“First these researchers decided what conclusions they wanted to find, and then they set off to find evidence to support it.” I was not bashing Jewish scientists. What Elhaik has described is a slam dunk fraud.
-
But why? Why would Jews who take such pride in the academic achievement risk exposing themselves to a group deception which was bound to be discovered later? Dr. Elhaik does not delve into the quicksand of the politics, but I will gladly do so.
-
They perpetrated the fraud solely to support the bogus biblical claim to Palestine which was anchored in their being a separate people. This distinguished them from all others because they claimed a land title in their blood.
-
They bet the farm on this DNA proof of purchase, a God given bar coded passport to the Palestine. Dr. Ehaik just erased the bar code. It was just stamped on anyway, because it was never in the blood.”CONTINUED
The politically motivated Zionist geneticist you cited refuses to show his work and has the unique caveat that his findings would be of a "......non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.”
“Did YU's Harry Ostrer Cook The Genetic Books To Support False Findings Of Ashkenazi Jews Origins?”
http://failedmessiah.typepad.com/failed_messi...
EXCERPTS "Ostrer replied that the data are not publicly available.
“Criteria for reviewing include novelty and strength of the proposal, non-overlap with current or planned activities, and non-defamatory nature toward the Jewish people.” That last requirement, Elhaik argues, reveals the bias of Ostrer and his collaborators." CONTINUED
________
That was only ONE of the many times I've debunked your Hasbara nonsense
So, where's your credible source for: "Hebrew=Jewish, same ancestral heritage"
What about the millions of Jewish converts over the years.
You're saying that if an Eskimo converts to Judaism that means his ancestors are suddenly Hebrews.
Try again
A post doctoral researcher with little credential is being laughed at by the scientific community

Got any more jokes?

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2103 Sep 4, 2014
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that with that Brain Bubble you'd be more careful who call an "Idiot"
Now would be a good time to use your Rule # 13
“Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.
Got anything of value to add?

DO you get paid by the word?

Since: Aug 14

Powhatan, VA

#2104 Sep 4, 2014
Just A Number wrote:
<quoted text>
Not all Americans support the President and his decisions. I however feel the Jewish People have been wronged and hated for basically no reason.
EDITED FOR SPACE
.
Virtually all anti Jewish sentiment stems from the criminal atrocities of Israel's Genocidal Zionists

It is the Zionists that carry out Israel's "final Solution" called Plan Dalet"

“Israel’s “Plan Dalet”: The Green Light for Zionism’s Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”

http://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-plan-dal...

EXCERPT “On that day in 1948, two months before Israel’s unilateral declaration of independence in defiance of the will of the organized international community as it then was at the UN, Zionism’s in-Palestine political and military leaders met in Tel Aviv to formally adopt PLAN DALET, the blueprint with operational military orders for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.”CONTINUED

It is the Zionist leaders & policy makers who support Israel's Genocidal massacres that incur hostility toward most all Jews:

"Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them".
[Israeli General Moshe Dayan; diaries]
http://www.trionfopublishing.com/news_page_49...

"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed
against the boulders and walls." -- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak
Shamir in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988

"We will carry out a greater holocaust against the Palestinians," Matan Vilnai, Deputy israeli Defense Minister
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2010/...

“..... most Palestinians “were born to die—we just have to help them.”CONTINUED
Amiram Levin, former head of the Israeli army’s northern command :

"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as
slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General
Shlomo Lahat as mayor of Tel Aviv, 1983.

"What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on.[…] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases." Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot

 Re: Palestinian Mothers "They have to die and their houses should be demolished so that they cannot bear any more terrorists.”
Ayelet Shaked Israeli MK
http://www.albawaba.com/editorchoice/ayelet-s...

"We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own..." —Ari Shavat. Reproduced in the New York Times, May 27th, 1999
________
And, Zionists do not hesitate to kill Jews when it serves their purpose:

“When a shipload of Jewish refugees on the Danube river were refused permission to disembark anywhere, Henry Montor the leader of the United Jewish Appeal explained that they could not be allowed to sail the Holy Land because “Palestine cannot be flooded with old people or with undesirables”.(Feb. 1, 1940).

“On Nov. 25, 1940 the Haganah commanders ordered the blowing up of the ship Patria in Haifa Harbor as a protest against England’s plan to send refugees to Mauritius instead of to Palestine, and thus 272 Jewish refugees perished.”

There are more ethical Jews, today, than ever who oppose Zionist Genocide:

“Jewish activists light children’s dolls on fire at Yad Vashem to protest Gaza attack”
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/activists-child...

“American Jews are giving up on Israel”
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/american-jews-...

Thanks

Since: Aug 14

Powhatan, VA

#2105 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
A post doctoral researcher with little credential is being laughed at by the scientific community
Got any more jokes?
Show some sources for your desperate & fraudulent claim

Since: Aug 14

Powhatan, VA

#2106 Sep 4, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Got anything of value to add?
DO you get paid by the word?
1. Does debunking your Hasbara Drivel count

2. Honesty is its own reward

I see you decided to choose # 13 from your Hasbara playbook below rather than attempt an honest, On Topic response:

Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.

You of all Hasbarats shouldn't be calling others "Idiot"
James

Corona, CA

#2107 Sep 4, 2014
Right out of the muslimrat playbook.
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Does debunking your Hasbara Drivel count
2. Honesty is its own reward
I see you decided to choose # 13 from your Hasbara playbook below rather than attempt an honest, On Topic response:
Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression”
http://www.brasscheck.com/martin.html
EXCERPTS:
1. Dummy up. If it's not reported, if it's not news, it didn't happen.
2. Wax indignant. This is also known as the "how dare you?" gambit.
3. Characterize the charges as "rumors" or, better yet, "wild rumors." If, in spite of the news blackout, the public is still able to learn about the suspicious facts, it can only be through "rumors."
4. Knock down straw men. Deal only with the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Even better, create your own straw men. Make up wild rumors and give them lead play when you appear to debunk all the charges, real and fanciful alike.
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
6. Impugn motives. Attempt to marginalize the critics by suggesting strongly that they are not really interested in the truth but are simply pursuing a partisan political agenda or are out to make money.
7. Invoke authority. Here the controlled press and the sham opposition can be very useful.
8. Dismiss the charges as "old news."
9. Come half-clean. This is also known as "confession and avoidance" or "taking the limited hang-out route." This way, you create the impression of candor and honesty while you admit only to relatively harmless, less-than-criminal "mistakes." This stratagem often requires the embrace of a fall-back position quite different from the one originally taken.
10. Characterize the crimes as impossibly complex and the truth as ultimately unknowable.
11. Reason backward, using the deductive method with a vengeance. With thoroughly rigorous deduction, troublesome evidence is irrelevant. For example: We have a completely free press. If they know of evidence that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (BATF) had prior knowledge of the Oklahoma City bombing they would have reported it. They haven't reported it, so there was no prior knowledge by the BATF. Another variation on this theme involves the likelihood of a conspiracy leaker and a press that would report it.
12. Require the skeptics to solve the crime completely.
13. Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.
You of all Hasbarats shouldn't be calling others "Idiot"

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2108 Sep 4, 2014
James wrote:
Right out of the muslimrat playbook.
<quoted text>
Excellent # 5

5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.

That seems to be the only one you can accomplish without the help of a rational adult.

By all means, avoid a fair & open debate at any cost.

Now, dog paddle on back to the shallow end of the think tank & be quiet.

Since: Aug 14

Richmond, VA

#2110 Sep 4, 2014
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
That they consider this a victory worth dancing in the streets (and killing more of their own women and children with celebratory gunfire) says a lot more about Palestinian Arabs than it does about the Israelis.
And none of what it says is complimentary.
Where's your source for this "story"

How many were killed by celebratory gunfire or are you just making that up?

And, what do you know about life in a crowded, toxic, Open Air Shooting Gallery?

Perhaps a small number were simply celebrating surviving another Mass Murder committed in the longest lasting Ethnic Cleansing at the hands of the most ruthless genocidal Occupier in modern history.

When has there been anything about Palestine's native Christians, Muslims, Copts etc that has been complimentary in the eyes of a bigoted Apologist for Genocide?
James

Corona, CA

#2111 Sep 4, 2014
You just described yourself heir goebbels
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
Excellent # 5
5. Call the skeptics names like "conspiracy theorist," "nut," "ranter," "kook," "crackpot," and of course, "rumor monger." You must then carefully avoid fair and open debate with any of the people you have thus maligned.
That seems to be the only one you can accomplish without the help of a rational adult.
By all means, avoid a fair & open debate at any cost.
Now, dog paddle on back to the shallow end of the think tank & be quiet.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#2113 Sep 5, 2014
scirocco wrote:
<quoted text>
Abraham was the first Jew. Noah, Adam and Eve were prior to Abraham. Moses was post Abraham and thus a Jew.
You qualify as the biggest idiot.
You are not worth responding to.

Since: Aug 09

Saint Louis, MO

#2114 Sep 5, 2014
susanblange wrote:
<quoted text>The tem Jew comes from a member of the house of Judah, the southern kingdom. Abraham and Moses were not Jewish, they were Hebrew but they practiced what would later become Judaism.
Thank you. That is closer to the truth. The main point is Hebrews came before Jews. But an even bigger question is what was Monotheism before the Hebrews? The answer is Islam. Adam and Eve were Muslims. And we still the Kabah built by Adam as proof.

Since: May 14

Location hidden

#2116 Sep 5, 2014
Grau wrote:
<quoted text>
Virtually all anti Jewish sentiment stems from the criminal atrocities of Israel's Genocidal Zionists
It is the Zionists that carry out Israel's "final Solution" called Plan Dalet"
“Israel’s “Plan Dalet”: The Green Light for Zionism’s Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine”
http://www.globalresearch.ca/israels-plan-dal...
EXCERPT “On that day in 1948, two months before Israel’s unilateral declaration of independence in defiance of the will of the organized international community as it then was at the UN, Zionism’s in-Palestine political and military leaders met in Tel Aviv to formally adopt PLAN DALET, the blueprint with operational military orders for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine.”CONTINUED
It is the Zionist leaders & policy makers who support Israel's Genocidal massacres that incur hostility toward most all Jews:
"Our strategy was always to provoke the Arabs and get an appropriate response so we could attack and smash them".
[Israeli General Moshe Dayan; diaries]
http://www.trionfopublishing.com/news_page_49...
"(The Palestinians) would be crushed like grasshoppers ... heads smashed
against the boulders and walls." -- Isreali Prime Minister (at the time) Yitzhak
Shamir in a speech to Jewish settlers New York Times April 1, 1988
"We will carry out a greater holocaust against the Palestinians," Matan Vilnai, Deputy israeli Defense Minister
http://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2010/...
“..... most Palestinians “were born to die—we just have to help them.”CONTINUED
Amiram Levin, former head of the Israeli army’s northern command :
"We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as
slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General
Shlomo Lahat as mayor of Tel Aviv, 1983.
"What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on.[…] We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases." Maj. Gen. Gadi Eizenkot
 Re: Palestinian Mothers "They have to die and their houses should be demolished so that they cannot bear any more terrorists.”
Ayelet Shaked Israeli MK
http://www.albawaba.com/editorchoice/ayelet-s...
"We killed them out of a certain naive hubris. Believing with absolute certitude that now, with the White House, the Senate, and much of the American media in our hands, the lives of others do not count as much as our own..." —Ari Shavat. Reproduced in the New York Times, May 27th, 1999
________
And, Zionists do not hesitate to kill Jews when it serves their purpose:
“When a shipload of Jewish refugees on the Danube river were refused permission to disembark anywhere, Henry Montor the leader of the United Jewish Appeal explained that they could not be allowed to sail the Holy Land because “Palestine cannot be flooded with old people or with undesirables”.(Feb. 1, 1940).
“On Nov. 25, 1940 the Haganah commanders ordered the blowing up of the ship Patria in Haifa Harbor as a protest against England’s plan to send refugees to Mauritius instead of to Palestine, and thus 272 Jewish refugees perished.”
There are more ethical Jews, today, than ever who oppose Zionist Genocide:
“Jewish activists light children’s dolls on fire at Yad Vashem to protest Gaza attack”
http://mondoweiss.net/2014/07/activists-child...
“American Jews are giving up on Israel”
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/american-jews-...
Thanks
Once again...you tell us the date of Plan Dalet and when the Arabs began the war against the
Jews

GO ahead make my day
cancersuxs

Faribault, MN

#2117 Sep 5, 2014
Muzzies are insane and pure evil. That said Israel is no better. I say the USA cuts all ties with the whole region blockades any trade from an to the are and cuts of all funding to whole region and lets the muzzies an jews fight it out..

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Acme Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Bellingham man sentenced to 9 months for 2013 rape Jun 7 LMac 2
News Medical examinera s office identifies human sku... May 26 binaries 1
Review: Complete Auto Repair Service (Apr '11) May '16 CARS4724 7
News Gold still streams through the Skagit and Samis... (Sep '09) Nov '13 Nick 6
Election Who do you support for U.S. House in Washington... (Oct '10) Jul '13 Michael Monson 5
Recall of Mt Baker school board member (Sep '12) Sep '12 John L 1
Debate: Farm Chores - Acme, WA (May '12) May '12 John L 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Acme Mortgages