The Racist Roots of Gun Control
Posted in the Chicago Forum
The historical record provides compelling evidence that racism underlies gun control laws - and not in any subtle way. Throughout much of American history, gun control was openly stated as a method for keeping blacks and Hispanics "in their place," and to quiet the racial fears of whites.
Could white folks want to disarm black folks so they can oppress them again? I don't know what do you think?
“Grow the power within yourself”
Since: Feb 11
As always, the projections of liberals reveal EXACTLY what they are planning to do. Let's add in some facts.
*"blacks and hispanics" are more likely to live in cities then "whites". Overall, the majority of larger cities are run by LIBERALS. They are mostly all disarmed to the bone due to LIBERALS. They tend to have the highest amount of violence, assault and murder despite LIBERALS outlawing it all along with guns.
So let's rephrase "mike''s closing statement then.
Could liberals along with racially stoked hispanics and blacks, who think the world (i. e. white people ) of today owe them everything want to disarm others so they can continue to tax them to death, keep feeding other fools how evil and wicked whites are and rob them more easily?
Throughout African and native American history, systemic torture, live sacrifices, and absolute mass totalitarianism, mostly due to super-blind religious oppression that makes the Catholic Church seem like modern metrosexual sissy-boys. Also, they did not only enslave any captive they didn't sacrifice or murder, but also base laws in huge parts due to religion on a level that faaaar supercedes "whites" at same time period.
Finally, I got news for you. I know people who are NOT 100% white that actually have firearms. GOSH!!! I even happen to know a "black" that has a concealed carry permit.. Is he a coconut then??
Since: Nov 08
More men under arms than in Iran, more than France and Germany combined.
These men deployed to the woods of a single American state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms, and no one was killed.
That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted the woods of Pennsylvania and Michigan's 700,000 hunters, all of whom have now returned home safely. Toss in a quarter million hunters in West Virginia and it literally establishes the fact that the hunters of those four states alone would comprise the largest army in the world.
Add to that the total number of hunters in the other 46 states and it becomes millions more.
Hunting is not just a way to fill the freezer. It's a matter of national security. That's why all enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see us disarmed.
Overall it's true, so if we disregard some assumptions that hunters don't possess the same skills as soldiers, the question would still remain... What army would want to face 30, 40, 50 million armed citizens?
I'm glad to be part of the world's largest army. I would risk my life to protect Americans no matter what color they are.
101 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now
|Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08)||3 min||Grey Ghost||1,033,954|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||6 min||litesong||42,945|
|Abby 4-17||8 min||Mister Tonka||18|
|Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09)||14 min||ScarletandOlive||96,031|
|Amy 4-17||19 min||ScarletandOlive||14|
|Chicago ranked among top 25 most frugal cities||21 min||Guest||1|
|Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10)||53 min||jimtownhounddogsniffing||47,005|
|BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09)||1 hr||Jacques from Ottawa||167,425|