US Land Claims in Bundy Case Based on...

US Land Claims in Bundy Case Based on Lie-Started, Treaty-Violating

Posted in the Chicago Forum

Washington Blog

Matawan, NJ

#1 Apr 15, 2014
US Land Claims in Bundy Case Based on Lie-Started, Treaty-Violating, Unlawful War on Mexico
Washington's Blog
April 15, 2014
“The only thing new in the world is the history you don’t know.”- President Harry Truman, Plain Speaking: An Oral Biography of Harry S. Truman (1974), Merle Miller, pg. 26.
The Bundy land case raises questions of US federal authority on the ~80% of Nevada they claim to “own.” It’s also a spark for Americans to act on a local issue within a context of US government “leaders” engaging in OBVIOUS crimes centering in war, money, and media (also in ~100 other crucial areas).
US land claims (and here) in Nevada and throughout the US Southwest originate in similar crimes to current US lie-started, treaty-violating, unlawful Wars of Aggression. These claims are from violating treaties with Native Americans, and a lie-started, treaty-violating, unlawful invasive war on Mexico.
If the land in question was stolen by the US federal government, and used US military to do so only with unlawful orders and lies to our trusting soldiers and families, then we have strong arguments that all ensuing claims of the federal government are void because anything passed as so-called “law” in obvious violation to the US Constitution is void with zero legal force.
And that said, again, the big picture action is to arrest US “leadership” from more obvious crimes and lies in the present in war, money, and media (plus ~100 other crucial areas)
The Mexican-American War is vitally important to understand because it sets the precedent of a US president lying, violating clear treaty, and the US stealing resources at the expense of thousands of deaths of US soldiers, and many multiples of those deaths of the people we attacked. Then, as today, the majority of Americans believed their “leaders” in ignorance of the facts, and without media’s coverage of clear voices like Abraham Lincoln’s to explain the facts.
The US invaded Mexico in 1846 despite it being a clear treaty violation and upon clear lies of US President Polk:“American blood shed upon the American soil.” The result of the war was the US taking 40% of Mexico’s land. Although historians note that freshman member of Congress Abraham Lincoln was/is correct that the president lied and violated a treaty with criminal complicity of Congress, both parties’ and media propaganda allowed the war to move forward without criminal prosecution. The House of Representatives had enough votes to censure the president for,“a war unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President of the United States,” but not to impeach. Importantly, I’m unaware of any historian’s rational challenge to this history, despite the lies of omission you’ll read in corporate media textbooks today.
But don’t believe any expert or me; use your critical thinking skills. This is as easy as our baseball rule analogy that when a person knows the rule when a runner is safe or out at first base, there’s no need to ask anyone. If you know that:
a treaty is defined in Article Six of the US Constitution as the “Supreme Law of the Land,” the US had the Adams-Onís Treaty with Mexico (originally with Spain and formally transferred to Mexico in 1831) in crystal-clear language regarding the areas of the now Southwest US (including Texas with all the “border dispute” lands because the Sabine River between Louisiana and today’s Texas was the agreed border):“The two high contracting parties agree to cede and renounce all their rights, claims, and pretensions to the territories described by the said line, that is to say:
Read the rest of the article
http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/04/no_author/...
Sammy

East Bernstadt, KY

#2 Apr 17, 2014
No He's a tax cheat and a COWARD!!!. A man that uses women as standing members for His guard is a yellow bellied coward if you ask me!!!. I thought rich conservative people was supposed to fight their own battles not depend on other people, I thought that's what they believed in. I guess He'll be using Children as a shield for Himself next. Rich people should pay their taxes!. After all, this country has given itself graciously to them, This country has done so Mitch for them and they need to learn to give something back, Conservatives and rich people call Bill Clinton a "Draft Dodger", yet they themselves are TAX DODGERS!!!. Besides, rich people don't have to go fight in wars and we use tax money to fight wars!!!. Rich people ain't nothing but a big bunch of HOGS THAT WONT GIVE BACK AND THEY TAKE WHAT THEY CAN OFF YOU!!!!!!.
You made a mistake

Matawan, NJ

#3 Apr 18, 2014
Everything you said is almost true except that Bundy had volunteers. He didn't put anyone up in harms way and the militia from other states were on their way there except that the feds heard of it and left the area.

The rest is true if you are speaking of the cowardly NRA. Remember if you get any donation material from the NRA don't send them any money. They just use it to buy $800.00 shoes,$2000 suits and $80,000 cars for themselves.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Aquarius-WY 1,563,337
Bill and Hillary 35 min Art Vandalay 13
WHO'D have thunk it? 44 min Art Vandalay 7
Maxwell street ghosts 2 hr LATEX Art 2
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 hr Dr Guru 242,219
Jonny's Towing is Chicagoland's Most Crooked Co... 6 hr Art Mandalay 63
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 8 hr They cannot kill ... 11,008

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages