Trial identities to be protected

Full story: Chicago Tribune

Officers from the federal witness-protection program will testify from behind a screen in a trial accusing a deputy U.S. marshal of leaking information about the main prosecution witness in the landmark Family Secrets organized-crime case, a federal judge ruled Tuesday.

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 5 of5
Cadillac

Darien, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Apr 8, 2009
 
This is unconstitutional!

Ammendment #6:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

.
.
Going to hide behind a screen?
Unconstitutional!!!!
Jethro

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Apr 8, 2009
 
Cadillac wrote:
This is unconstitutional!
Ammendment #6:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
.
.
Going to hide behind a screen?
Unconstitutional!!!!
We'd burn through a lot of under-cover agents if you were in charge.
Advocate4Liberty

Waukegan, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Apr 8, 2009
 
Jethro wrote:
<quoted text>
We'd burn through a lot of under-cover agents if you were in charge.
You're right. Secrecy is necessary for the KGB, oops, federal government, to operate efficiently without a bunch of busy bodies questioning their every crime, er, move.
blackolives

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Apr 8, 2009
 
Sorry to the bleeding heart ACLU types, but it seems to me he is getting his constitutional rights to confront his accuser protected. There is nothing wrong with the judge having one very modest safeguard to protect the identity of undercover Marshalls and protected witnesses. Or would you rather see more dead cops, like the 4 in Oakland and the 3 in Pittsburgh this month alone? You anti-government nut jobs are a joke. Go blow up a Starbucks at the next WTO or something you low life idiots. Or are you to busy sitting in Starbucks drinking a $4 latte and crying about an oppressive government, while living off your daddies trust fund?

Since: Jan 09

Gurnee, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Apr 24, 2009
 
Love your country, fear your government

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 5 of5
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••