First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Feb 08

Location hidden

#21 Nov 27, 2012
Porto wrote:
<quoted text>
Was the 95% WERE found to have been abused- or was it 95% of abusers who were caught CLAIMED to have been abused? There IS a difference and it's possible that someone capable of doing such an evil act could make that claim to evade punishment.
Except that doesn't get them out of any punishment. It's not considered a mitigating factor for adults, at least, not here. Your jurisdiction may differ.

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#22 Nov 28, 2012
NWmoon wrote:
<quoted text>Except that doesn't get them out of any punishment. It's not considered a mitigating factor for adults, at least, not here. Your jurisdiction may differ.
I don't think it's much of a mitigating factor anywhere, and shouldn't be. I think we can have compassion for damaged people, but... I can't let 'em off the hook for crimes.
Porto

Nashville, TN

#23 Nov 28, 2012
NWmoon wrote:
<quoted text>Except that doesn't get them out of any punishment. It's not considered a mitigating factor for adults, at least, not here. Your jurisdiction may differ.
Put it this way: I think it's a safe bet that 95% of these evil folks would prefer having pollsters pity them ['You poor dear'!] as opposed to just thinking them worthless monsters [which they ARE]. Unless they somehow were able to follow molesters' entire lives back to infancy, there's no way the data can be irrefutably accurate- and molesters are notorious for lying and manipulating so why would anyone think they're above doing to same to pollsters? Not only do I not think they can be trusted, I also don't think they can believed!

Since: Jan 10

Location hidden

#24 Nov 28, 2012
Porto wrote:
<quoted text>
Put it this way: I think it's a safe bet that 95% of these evil folks would prefer having pollsters pity them ['You poor dear'!] as opposed to just thinking them worthless monsters [which they ARE]. Unless they somehow were able to follow molesters' entire lives back to infancy, there's no way the data can be irrefutably accurate- and molesters are notorious for lying and manipulating so why would anyone think they're above doing to same to pollsters? Not only do I not think they can be trusted, I also don't think they can believed!
The data can be VERY accurate if it's gathered correctly.
PEllen

Chicago, IL

#25 Nov 28, 2012
RedheadwGlasses wrote:
<quoted text>
The data can be VERY accurate if it's gathered correctly.
56.8% of statistics are made up

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
amy 12-20 5 min Pippa 5
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min No Surprize 1,154,064
abby 12-20 23 min Pippa 5
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 37 min Rogue Scholar 05 181,811
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 4,917
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Sunshine 49,190
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Ralph 98,853
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 11:28 am PST

Bleacher Report11:28AM
Jay Cutler Rumors: Latest Details, Speculation on Bears QB's Future
Bleacher Report11:39 AM
Complete Week 16 Preview for Indianapolis
NBC Sports12:33 PM
1 thing even Rahm can't fix: Da Bears - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 1:01 PM
Cowboys' Murray listed as questionable for Colts - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:26 AM
Report: Executives suggest Bears could have to attach a draft pick to move Cutler