Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday 71,541
Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family. Full Story

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#66324 Jan 22, 2014
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh behave!
Good for all of us that I ran out of tissues the other day
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66325 Jan 22, 2014
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again, please read and respond. I am taking my questions one by one.
Ezekiel 6:5 And I will lay the dead carcases of the children of ISRAEL before their IDOLS"
What did GOD call them?
Who were they worshipping?
PS: If you make an HONEST attempt at the above I shall ignore the rest of my previous post. I shall introduce another point and I want us to reason together.
Finally, keep your misguided/lying and foolish opinion about who is a Jew to yourself and the spiritual PHARAOHS of Judaism aka rabbis and FOCUS on the words of God or what is found in the Tanach.
Now son, do as you are told and you shall see the LIGHT.
I don't believe in god so you will have to probe me in a different manner.

Also, I lack the biblical knowledge to respond to your query, Mr. Queer.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66326 Jan 22, 2014
HughBe wrote:
Oh Former dear, here is more help for you and the god-men of Judaism.
It is NOT the other point that I spoke of, it is just one of many passages that call you and them LIARS.
Your point is, once a Jew does not follow Judaism s/he is not a JEW.....
You couldn't be more wrong.

And point out where I actually wrote the words you attribute to me.

A Jew will still be Jewish ethnically if leaves Judaism. He will be an ethnic Jew but not a religious Jew.

I know we have covered all this before and no doubt Frijoles is laughing at me for even engaging you on this subject yet again.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66327 Jan 22, 2014
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
The coolest bad guys always quote Melville.
'Star Trek The Motion Picture' aka Star Trek 1, was actually written to be a series. When the studio decided to kill the series (which was to be called 'Star Trek New Voyages') they mashed up two scripts from the series and took the sets, props and actors who were already filming the pilot to make the movie.
That is the reason for the slow pacing. The scripts were written to build up to a mid season climax after six to ten episodes, not 132 minutes.
On its own, I would have to agree that 'STWOK' was a better film than 'STTMP'(much more watchable) But,'STTMP' was cinegraphically better and closer to the tone of the original 'Star Trek' series.
Fair enough and interesting background.

Can I take it you're also a Star Trek fan vs Star Wars?

I had looked up the Kahn quote but forgot it was Melville.

Reminds of a good short story - Bartleby the Scrivener.

He kept saying "I would prefer not to". Good stuff to the teenager I
was at the time I read it.(Him and of course Holden Caulfield.)
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66328 Jan 22, 2014
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: nah! considering the budget, i think the first one was better.
The first one dragged for me.

I even remember the approach to the Enterprise
at the beginning.

It took forever!

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#66329 Jan 22, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
You couldn't be more wrong.
And point out where I actually wrote the words you attribute to me.
A Jew will still be Jewish ethnically if leaves Judaism. He will be an ethnic Jew but not a religious Jew.
I know we have covered all this before and no doubt Frijoles is laughing at me for even engaging you on this subject yet again.
Ask it what the two denominations are that it goes to.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66330 Jan 22, 2014
Frijoles wrote:
More stupidity from the gay Jamaican I see
,

When he asks me technical questions about the good book,
he loses me.

Too late in life for me to become a biblical scholar or apologist.

I just know Jews don't believe in JC as the son of god.

Otherwise they'd be Christians.

That part at least seems fairly straight forward.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66331 Jan 22, 2014
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
I heard they just like to hang out (at those conventions).
LOL!!!

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#66332 Jan 22, 2014
MORALS

What're morals? People say they're mere mental constructs of right or wrong that can be dispensed with or which have no real existence except in a subjective sense since materialistic science cannot answer questions on morality. What is mind? Mind is a specific frequency of vibration of the energy field with its innate consciousness. Thus, morals have a basis in the reality and are not simply intangible mental constructs that're more subjective than objective. Any action that results in bringing more order into the system is moral, any act that introduces disturbance in the energy field of the system is amoral which we know is true from personal experience and by observing world events. Are the Gods (created by the yogis by projecting their own mental formations in the universal energy field) moral? Far from it. Were the religious prophets moral? Far from it. Are most people in the world moral? Far from it.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#66333 Jan 22, 2014
Neither crass rationalists nor the religious nuts are capable of entering into deeper states of consciousness because rationalists are too rigid in thinking and cannot think in terms of omnijectiveness, while religious freaks are too caught up in the shenanigans of the Personal God (that was created by a powerful mental projection of a mystic or by a group of mystics of their religion) they worship to look at the reality in its plenary splendor and besides they have weird creationist ideas that warp their perception of the reality. Only those rare individuals with a sensitive nervous system with 24/7 burning aspiration to unite with the higher dimensions of the reality and who understand the subjective as well as the objective aspects of the universal energy field with its inherent consciousness can hope to become yogis.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#66334 Jan 22, 2014
Of tea sommeliers, white gloved waiters, ornate lobbies, swanky furniture, elegant ambience, Reidel crystal, gold-edged Bernardaud porcelain, world foods, pricey spirits and South Mumbai snobbery of the Malabar Hill, Carmichael Road, Altamount Road, Cuffe Parade, Breach Candy and Nepeansea Road kind. Welcome to the heritage-tagged Hotel Taj Mahal Palace and Tower, Mumbai.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#66335 Jan 22, 2014
Infinity - Infinity = Infinity!

Since: Nov 13

Denver, CO

#66337 Jan 22, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
The first one dragged for me.
I even remember the approach to the Enterprise
at the beginning.
It took forever!
rabbee: nah! i am talking about, star trek the series - about the wrath of kahn. so far all the star trek movies, are little more than expansions of one of their episodes - nothing really new. just like the new Riddick movie, is just another pitch black movie with a twist.

Since: Nov 13

Denver, CO

#66338 Jan 22, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>,
When he asks me technical questions about the good book,
he loses me.
Too late in life for me to become a biblical scholar or apologist.
I just know Jews don't believe in JC as the son of god.
Otherwise they'd be Christians.
That part at least seems fairly straight forward.
rabbee: well HaMosheeach is the same one as the last two Torot times. and this world still can't figure out, G-D'S Story does not change to this world rejecting it from G-D again.

Since: Nov 13

Denver, CO

#66339 Jan 22, 2014
G-D already told this world, Who HaMosheeach is. and this world still does not believe it, here in TheTorah again. and just can't get that G-D'S Truth does not ever change, to this world making all the same mistakes again.

“Act Interdimensional ly”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#66340 Jan 22, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
Fair enough and interesting background.
Can I take it you're also a Star Trek fan vs Star Wars?
I had looked up the Kahn quote but forgot it was Melville.
Reminds of a good short story - Bartleby the Scrivener.
He kept saying "I would prefer not to". Good stuff to the teenager I
was at the time I read it.(Him and of course Holden Caulfield.)
Trek vs Wars? Alien apples and genetically mutated oranges. Both are cool but Trek is probably more closely related to the human condition and the story lines are supposed to make you think (mostly about alien women with gravity-defying boobs).

Star Wars, on the other hand, is good old-fashioned space blaster action and good fun (we won't speak of those "prequels" for which may Mr Lucas be fed to the Sarlac).

FYI -- Holden Caulfield is a character in a novel by J.D. Salinger, not the author.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66341 Jan 23, 2014
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: nah! i am talking about, star trek the series - about the wrath of kahn. so far all the star trek movies, are little more than expansions of one of their episodes - nothing really new. just like the new Riddick movie, is just another pitch black movie with a twist.
Love the original series. That's where it all came from.

Ever see the Twilight Zone episode with Shatner on the plane? Classic.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66342 Jan 23, 2014
yehoshooah adam wrote:
<quoted text>
rabbee: well HaMosheeach is the same one as the last two Torot times. and this world still can't figure out, G-D'S Story does not change to this world rejecting it from G-D again.
You lost me.

Frijoles would understand.
former res

Cheshire, CT

#66343 Jan 23, 2014
Rick Moss wrote:
<quoted text>
Trek vs Wars? Alien apples and genetically mutated oranges. Both are cool but Trek is probably more closely related to the human condition and the story lines are supposed to make you think (mostly about alien women with gravity-defying boobs).
Star Wars, on the other hand, is good old-fashioned space blaster action and good fun (we won't speak of those "prequels" for which may Mr Lucas be fed to the Sarlac).
FYI -- Holden Caulfield is a character in a novel by J.D. Salinger, not the author.
Yes, I know. Was comparing Bartlbey with Holden - two characters. Thought you were with me! Two independent types.

Most American school kids had to read Catcher.

Star Wars is ok/ I'm generally not a sci fi fan. Save the Star Treks mentioned.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#66344 Jan 23, 2014
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
You lost me.
Frijoles would understand.
or not!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 min scirocco 50,481
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,174,308
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 16 min Analog man 5,396
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 21 min TRD 69,018
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 33 min RayOne 183,937
lace hairline fusion ! ! ! 1 hr Soliloquy 2
Dear Abby 1-31-15 1 hr PEllen 1

Winter Storm Warning for Cook County was issued at January 31 at 2:47AM CST

Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots