Eric---I'd settle for an admission on his part that he had not thought through his hypothesis completely nor thought to apply it to Jesus as described in the New Testament.<quoted text>
I'd settle for an admission on his part that he had not thought through his hypothesis completely nor thought to apply it to Jesus as described in the New Testament. Then we can move on. We have all had the opportunity on here to bite our tongue and admit mistakes. Hugh should not be made to do more.
HughBe--- You are a COMIC. Are you the one that have maintained that I ask questions that I know the answers for? YES
This should tell you that I am a THINKER. So, although the matter under consideration is not a question it is my HABIT to THINK. Besides my approach is honest and logical and so it did not require me to contemplate its implications in relationship to Jesus before I made the utterance.
I have observed that at best you think occasionally. I am not like you in this regard and neither am I like you to speak lies so freely. It is a true statement to say that I am almost PERFECT when it comes to honesty.
Finally, I have a LOGICAL, HONEST and scriptural answer. I would not insist on saying this if it was not so especially since the context is not a joke or a tease.