Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

Full story: Newsday 71,255
Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family. Full Story
JOEL

New Delhi, India

#55450 Jun 25, 2013
The sobriquet "Land of the Rising Sun", suits Japan in so many ways.

Wow! What a nation!
JOEL

New Delhi, India

#55451 Jun 25, 2013
Help ever, hurt never.
JOEL

New Delhi, India

#55452 Jun 25, 2013
EVOLUTION?

1) Does evolution mean a creating of something new and superior in terms of information content from something inferior? This claim is as silly as creation from nothing.

2) Macro-evolution - bodily transformation of one species into another species, is pure BS.

3) Minor changes via gene mutation in a species can take place .

4) Before tackling macro-evolution, people should first dwell on the question of origins of life in matter - how did sentience arise in insentient matter?

5) Sentience, as a particular gradation of consciousness-energy with a specific rate of vibration, could have arisen in matter if and only if it was previously involved in matter and simpl.y emerged in matter when the surface conditions favored life on earth.
JOEL

New Delhi, India

#55453 Jun 25, 2013
Off to make su su. A few drops have stained my pristine white, cotton-silk pajamas.

(smiles)
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#55454 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.aglp.org/gap/1_history/
Alfred Kinsey's and colleagues' study on male and female sexuality marked the beginning of a cultural shift away from the view of homosexuality as pathology and toward viewing it as a normal variant of human sexuality.
Kinsey had criticized scientists' tendency to represent homosexuals and heterosexuals as "inherently different types of individuals."
Therefore, he introduced a 0 to 6 scale to classify sexual behavior or fantasy from "exclusively heterosexual" to "exclusively homosexual" (the "Kinsey Scale"). The "Kinsey Reports" found that 37% of males and 13% of females had at least some overt homosexual experience to the point of orgasm; furthermore, 10% of males were more or less exclusively homosexual and 8% of males were exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55. This is where the frequently quoted "10%" figure comes from. 2-6% of women reported more or less exclusively homosexual experience or response. A more modest 4% of males and 1-3% of females had been exclusively homosexual after the onset of adolescence until the time of the interview.
"Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects." (Kinsey, et al. 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948), p. 639).
0- Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6- Exclusively homosexual
(Kinsey 1948), p. 638
rabbee: your considering the guy, who raped and had babies raped and sodomized as morally sane? i would not accept anything, the criminal kinsey said as the truth.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55456 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Still have a hard time believing you had an advanced education. Did you ever take a science class?
Oh I wish that you had eyes to see, the obvious.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55457 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Whose "scriptures"? Why should I flock your way?
HughBe -- Look into the scriptures and there you shall see the WAY. If you are bent on following a man follow me as I am on the WAY. The law of God does not FLOCK around and I don't when dealing with it.

Frijoles---Whose "scriptures"?

HughBe--- God's scripture meaning the words He gave to Moses and all the prophets.

Avoid CORRECTED "scriptures". Use the most ancient versions.

Frijoles-- Why should I flock your way?

HughBe--- Because I am on the ONLY way. There is no other way but the way that was delivered to the prophets.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55458 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
So, now that you have defined religion, your next project is to redefine science?
I'm not buying it. No more than I buy into your other definitions.
What comes to mind is a tiny minnow trying to swim upstream. Noble thought. But utterly useless, futile, and waste of all time.
HughBe---They are converts for whatever reason but it is certainly NOT scientific.

Frijoles---So, now that you have defined religion, your next project is to redefine science?

HughBe--- I shall now define religion and it is a belief in gods or God or the supernatural.

Definition of SCIENCE it is the study of the "world" that we live in and so its pillars are VERIFIABLE, REPLICABLE, OBSERVABLE etc.

Science is NOT faith it is NOT religion and so for it to REVERSE its position on a matter e.g. the classification of homosexuality as a mental health disease it means that the pillars of science must have been applied and led to NEW scientific discoveries. What are these VERIFIABLE discoveries?
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55459 Jun 25, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
Science bashing is necessary by bible literalists such as HughBe in order to maintain the delusion.
But you have to admit, the fact that he thinks he's qualified to debate evolution and natural selection is cute (in the same way that a baby making his first boom-boom is cute).
Tell me CoR, how do you approach proving a mathematical equation?

Do you omit some or any of the steps or facts? If Not why not?

Having answered the above, link the concept above to evolution and teach me the TRUTH of evolution.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55460 Jun 25, 2013
JOEL wrote:
Off to make su su. A few drops have stained my pristine white, cotton-silk pajamas.
(smiles)
Having made it, don't drink it. It is not a beverage.
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#55461 Jun 25, 2013
Off to "make" lunch.
JOEL

India

#55462 Jun 25, 2013
POLYTHEISM SCORES OVER MONOLATRY, MONOTHEISM & PAGANISM:

1) It's an egregious error to talk in terms of my god and your god.

2) These callous distinctions have been made by the so-called prophets with each trying to prove through force and threat that his god is simply the best while the other archetrypal beings or rival gods are inferior or evil. This parochial approach forms the basis of the Babylonian cults like kabbalah, Baal worship, Judaism, Islam and Christianity. This is the worst mistake one can make when it comes to dealing with the multiple powers of consciousness since it invites perpetual strife and imprisonment in narrowness.

3) If one is a believer the best appraoch is to respect all the various archetypal beings of the numerous planes of consciousness-energy. Respect the good and the bad powers so as not to antagonize any and to invite the blessings and help of all these powers of consciousness. In this way, the world is not divided into warring religious camps and at a deeper level of being one is not assaulted by those archetypal powers who one ignores, opposes and reviles. So, in this way, polytheism is superior to monolatrism, monotheism and paganism.

4) Monism exceeds polytheism and is the total conquest of the whole of nature and being that're simply seen as manifestations of one reality.
JOEL

India

#55463 Jun 25, 2013
SUPRAMENTAL YOGA IS SUPERIOR TO MONISM:

1) The supramental yoga exceeds monism and takes its stand on the unified field of consciousness-energy as manifested through the supramental range of consciousness-energy.

2) The cardinal error comitted by nondualism/monism is to consider consciousness the source of energy which is simply impossible and so in the final analysis monism falters and becomes mumbo jumbo.

3) Monism fails to recognize the fundamental difference between consciousness and energy that are like the obverse and reverse sides of a coin or the 2 ends of one pole of existence. One is intelligence, the other force. They form a unified field that is inseparable in their ultimate reaches where the highest ranges of consciousness and energy merge.
JOEL

India

#55464 Jun 25, 2013
MONOTHEISM IS A FALSE DOCTRINE:

1) Yes, monotheism is a false teaching since there exist a plethora of archetypal beings on the various planes of consciousness-energy and so the idea of just one God is simply ridiculous.

2) The god of a particular religion is simply a specific archetypal being chosen from many archetypal beings that the founder of the religion chose to worship and this is why we find numerous warnings in the various scriptures against worshipping other gods (rival archetypal beings of the same plane or of other planes).

3) One may correctly aver that existence is one since the basal constituents of the varied states of existence reduce to various vibrational modec of consciousness and energy that originate as a gradation from a unified field of consciousness-energy.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#55466 Jun 25, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>

HughBe--- I shall now define religion and it is a belief in gods or God or the supernatural.
Definition of SCIENCE it is the study of the "world" that we live in and so its pillars are VERIFIABLE, REPLICABLE, OBSERVABLE etc.
Science is NOT faith it is NOT religion and so for it to REVERSE its position on a matter e.g. the classification of homosexuality as a mental health disease it means that the pillars of science must have been applied and led to NEW scientific discoveries. What are these VERIFIABLE discoveries?
Science doesnt classify. People classify. Science suggests theories. Theories evolve as data collection and analyses evolve. Science is not static.

And yes, theories change all the time. Its all part of the method.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#55467 Jun 25, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
HughBe -- Look into the scriptures and there you shall see the WAY. If you are bent on following a man follow me as I am on the WAY. The law of God does not FLOCK around and I don't when dealing with it.
Frijoles---Whose "scriptures"?
HughBe--- God's scripture meaning the words He gave to Moses and all the prophets.
Avoid CORRECTED "scriptures". Use the most ancient versions.
Frijoles-- Why should I flock your way?
HughBe--- Because I am on the ONLY way. There is no other way but the way that was delivered to the prophets.
Your messiah complex again.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#55468 Jun 25, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
HughBe---They are converts for whatever reason but it is certainly NOT scientific.
Frijoles---So, now that you have defined religion, your next project is to redefine science?
HughBe--- I shall now define religion and it is a belief in gods or God or the supernatural.
Definition of SCIENCE it is the study of the "world" that we live in and so its pillars are VERIFIABLE, REPLICABLE, OBSERVABLE etc.
Science is NOT faith it is NOT religion and so for it to REVERSE its position on a matter e.g. the classification of homosexuality as a mental health disease it means that the pillars of science must have been applied and led to NEW scientific discoveries. What are these VERIFIABLE discoveries?
The scientific method is a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_meth...

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#55469 Jun 25, 2013
HughBe wrote:
<quoted text>
What are these VERIFIABLE discoveries?
And by the way, I already posted on the history of the reevaluation of the concept (Kinsey above)

I should of reminded you that before the last two posts, but your butchering of the scientific method appalled me.
Voluntarist

United States

#55470 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.aglp.org/gap/1_history/
Alfred Kinsey's and colleagues' study on male and female sexuality marked the beginning of a cultural shift away from the view of homosexuality as pathology and toward viewing it as a normal variant of human sexuality.
Kinsey had criticized scientists' tendency to represent homosexuals and heterosexuals as "inherently different types of individuals."
Therefore, he introduced a 0 to 6 scale to classify sexual behavior or fantasy from "exclusively heterosexual" to "exclusively homosexual" (the "Kinsey Scale"). The "Kinsey Reports" found that 37% of males and 13% of females had at least some overt homosexual experience to the point of orgasm; furthermore, 10% of males were more or less exclusively homosexual and 8% of males were exclusively homosexual for at least three years between the ages of 16 and 55. This is where the frequently quoted "10%" figure comes from. 2-6% of women reported more or less exclusively homosexual experience or response. A more modest 4% of males and 1-3% of females had been exclusively homosexual after the onset of adolescence until the time of the interview.
"Males do not represent two discrete populations, heterosexual and homosexual. The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories... The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects." (Kinsey, et al. 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (1948), p. 639).
0- Exclusively heterosexual with no homosexual
1- Predominantly heterosexual, only incidentally homosexual
2- Predominantly heterosexual, but more than incidentally homosexual
3- Equally heterosexual and homosexual
4- Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual
5- Predominantly homosexual, only incidentally heterosexual
6- Exclusively homosexual
(Kinsey 1948), p. 638
Kinsey was a pervert, but that answer was non-responsive
yehoshooah adam

Denver, CO

#55471 Jun 25, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
Your messiah complex again.
rabbee: christian - anointed or messiah like, aka follow the leader. does an apprentice, following the steps of their master, mean they have a messiah complex? does anyone doing what G-D, says to do to be holy. mean it is, a deity complex? does pleasing the boss, make you the boss?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 min PEllen 98,879
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min Incognito4Ever 1,155,823
Chicago Pizza Blows 15 min Larry 4
Chicago police stop black motorists more, ACLU ... 45 min reality is a crutch 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 49,319
Is Vanessa Hudgens A PORN-STAR ?? (Oct '07) 1 hr moe 189
amy 12-25 1 hr RACE 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Jacques Ottawa 182,087
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:06 am PST

Bleacher Report12:06AM
Indianapolis Colts vs. Tennessee Titans: Complete Week 17 Preview for Tennessee
NBC Sports 3:43 AM
Jay Cutler on Bears: "Everyone could get axed"
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Colts' Complete Week 17 Preview vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 6:00 AM
Bears vs. Vikings: What Experts Are Saying About Chicago
NBC Sports 6:03 AM
Jim Caldwell: No concerns about starting a rookie center