The courts interpret the law. Noone else is tasked with this. Certainly not you.<quoted text>
This is just another case where there is documentary proof and people reject it because "the courts have rejected it".
That doesn't mean it isn't true , that just means some politicians in robes are running interference for the system.
And if you go back to when the amendment was ratified, the wording that was rejected was stunning. The vague wording in the sixteenth amendment seems to have been picked on purpose.
If you dont recognize the courts, besides from being UnAmerican, you are a certified member of the fringe. Therefore, you have no standing to discuss anything of legal import.