Messianic Jews say they are persecute...

Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

There are 72043 comments on the Newsday story from Jun 21, 2008, titled Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel. In it, Newsday reports that:

Safety pins and screws are still lodged in 15-year-old Ami Ortiz's body three months after he opened a booby-trapped gift basket sent to his family.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Newsday.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47037 Jan 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
I did read his book in the first place!!
And I did not just commented his "pygminess" based on any prejudice.
These people decide their "Mission" before even writing the book.
If they want to picture some one as "devil"….they first make a picture of "devil" in their mind.
Then they start "looking for evidence"…and they collect one piece from here and one piece from there (all from "Authentic Islamic Book" no doubt) and then piece together to complete their picture of Devil.!!
A person who does not have actual knowledge of his mission is impressed by his deep knowledge of Islamic books.
His books are full of contradictions….They "usually" start with what great man our prophet was, his sincerity his calmness, his determination, his steadfastness….all positive traits.
Then one by one he breaks all these qualities and present the prophet as a "forger" "A sooth sayer" "A crafty man" a "Cruel man, "A sex maniac"… what happened to the "positive traits shown earlier"? All vanished in thin air!!
With each episode , they offer different explanation of his character…. All contradictory with each other.
This is the attitude of all such Western Scholars who write about the life of our prophet from "Authoritative Islamic Sources".
And people who do not know Arabic language and not aware of Islamic way of analysis and criticism are "taken in" by their writers.
I can find excuses for people who have no knowledge and talk from what they read in the papers and media…. But no excuse for these "knowledgeable people" who try to Create Falsehood from the Truth.
These people are agents of Devil , if not the Devil in human forms!!
OOOEEH an outright lie.
You did not read the book first.
I know you are familiar with f.i. Guilleaume since i quoted him extensively as well as some other more modern western writers. But if you are going to claim that the professor Margoliouth is all these people combined in one person we've stretched the byzantian to a kairoism.
So You are intimitely acquainted with all the people mentioned in the footnotes! That predate the western writers mentions by others in other threads.
Well that just can't be since a while back you never even heard of them.
(It's not that i can envisage you outguessing my next contribution and pre-read thus during my absesnse. Though you should be aware that i pick up on those little remarks like f.i. unfamiliarity or gross exagerations.)

It's only natural that the professor would point out that some behaviour would be consider contra western mores, though he frankly gave an example of a man living with the native americans and their alien ways, that serve however as an example of the way other cultures think and reason.

But i have not come upon any rant. Or outright polemics as you suggest.

So no MUQ you have not read the book.
Though i posted it so you could get familiar with a different approach. Alexander the Greats story is also not all roses and sunshine. Empire builders are usually not, but this book is about the conditions that enabled the man, a study as such.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47038 Jan 15, 2013
As to the duality also found in the traditins on Mohammed...well isn't it said that this is explained as being to serve as an example to all man. So they can recognize themselves in his life and choose a better path.

At least i came across that apology.

It is the new fad to present the prophet as all good. That political correctness i spoke about before, that makes people change texts.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47039 Jan 15, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
You really dont think you dont do the same towards us?
Do you know the meaning of the term "Self reflection"?
Interestingly some psychologists think that this is actually impossible.(Apart from a lot of processes that the mind has no control over. So even awareness, or 'I', or conscious would be a fiction.)
Only others can hold up the mirror to out wanton behaviours.
Even if we think about ourselves we can keep on doing that forever, but it would not change an iota, for it would still be the same conscious doing the thinking.
For innovation and creative change of behaviour you would frankly have to introduce a period of random behaviour.

And boy oh boy does that sound wrong here.
It's not as if we are lacking that.:))

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47040 Jan 15, 2013
Just wiki for D.S. Margoliouth and let me enlighten you on f.i. Snouck Gurgronje, who was by the way offered a professorship at the National Egypt University in Cairo in 1925.

Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje (8 February 1857 – 26 June 1936) was a Dutch scholar of Oriental cultures and languages and Advisor on Native Affairs to the colonial government of the Netherlands East Indies (now Indonesia).

Born in Oosterhout in 1857, he became a theology student at Leiden University in 1874. He received his doctorate at Leiden in 1880 with his dissertation ‘Het Mekkaansche Feest’("The Festivities of Mecca"). He became a professor at the Leiden School for Colonial Civil Servants in 1881.

Snouck, who was fluent in Arabic, through mediation with the Ottoman governor in Jeddah, was examined by a delegation of scholars from Mecca in 1884 and upon successfully completing the examination was allowed to commence a pilgrimage to the Holy Muslim city of Mecca in 1885. He was one of the first Western scholars of Oriental cultures to do so.

A pioneering traveler, he was a rare Western presence in Mecca, but embraced the culture and religion of his hosts with passion, converting to Islam.

---
So MUQ, no more fibbing.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#47041 Jan 15, 2013
MAAT wrote:
<quoted text>
Interestingly some psychologists think that this is actually impossible.(Apart from a lot of processes that the mind has no control over. So even awareness, or 'I', or conscious would be a fiction.)
Only others can hold up the mirror to out wanton behaviours.
Even if we think about ourselves we can keep on doing that forever, but it would not change an iota, for it would still be the same conscious doing the thinking.
For innovation and creative change of behaviour you would frankly have to introduce a period of random behaviour.
And boy oh boy does that sound wrong here.
It's not as if we are lacking that.:))
I am not looking for self actualization.

Just a minor reflection on ones own actions before one criticizes another for being a zealot.

MUQ doesnt even Google to perform this - so he has no excuse.

“Legumes of the World Unite ”

Since: Sep 11

Location hidden

#47042 Jan 15, 2013
MUQ doesnt even NEED Google to perform this - so he has no excuse.

(Frijoles does NEED a good editor.)

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47043 Jan 15, 2013
Interesting comment....uhhh

What i was getting at, actually was that MUQ just has the same tune bouncing in his head forever.

So would self reflection not also mean self actualisation with a twist?

Maybe we should simply tell him not to project anymore.

MUQ did not even google.

(we could both do with an editor, or a secretary friend.)

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47044 Jan 15, 2013
The jewish definition of faith is a stumbling block not only to R.
I got a comment that i must be stating pistis.

Apropos pistis sophia, i found J. Rendel Harris.
On the (origin jewish proselyte)psalms of solomon and the earliest christian Odes of Solomon.
Written in old Syriac, end of the first century in Antioch, where christianity was invented.

Especially Ode 19 is of interest. Also because it looks like a later text but still an odd one out given the trinitarian idea (though maybe for other reasons). It is definitely not gnostic.

quote

ODE 19.

Fantastic and not in harmony with the other Odes. The reference to a painless Virgin Birth is notable.

1 A cup of milk was offered to me: and I drank it in the sweetness of the delight of the Lord. 2 The Son is the cup and He who was milked is the Father: 3 And the Holy Spirit milked Him: because His breasts were full, and it was necessary for Him that His milk should be sufficiently released; 4 And the Holy Spirit opened His bosom and mingled the milk from the two breasts of the Father and gave the mixture to the world without their knowing: 5 And they who receive in its fulness are the ones on the right hand. 6 The Spirit opened the womb of the Virgin and she received conception and brought forth; and the Virgin became a Mother with many mercies; 7 And she travailed and brought forth a Son, without incurring pain; 8 And because she was not sufficiently prepared, and she had not sought a midwife (for He brought her to bear) she brought forth, as if she were a man, of her own will; 9 And she brought Him forth openly, and acquired Him with great dignity, 10 And loved Him in His swaddling clothes and guarded Him kindly, and showed Him in Majesty. Hallelujah.

http://www.goodnewsinc.net/othbooks/odesolmn....
But other
Gtown71

United States

#47045 Jan 15, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
The $30 is accounted for. The hotel got $25, the clerk takes $2, and the men get a $3 refund.
25+2+3 =30
If your point of this story is to show your inability to reason through a logic problem, you've succeeded ;-).
The points in my prior post stand.
My point is to let you know, that thing happen in this world that has nothing to do with logic.
It amazes me how people can open their mind into believing some of the wildest things, but to other wild sounding things -they just close their minds.
Religious people do the same thing.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#47046 Jan 15, 2013
Gtown71 wrote:
My point is to let you know, that thing happen in this world that has nothing to do with logic.
If anything, your story reinforces my point, not yours. Your story was a riddle designed to confuse the reader. In attempting to analyze the riddle, people tend to go with their initial instincts (much like they do with religion or try to explain something they don't understand). It's lazy thinking that leads to incorrect assumptions. In the end, though, I have shown that it is logic and a proper understanding of mathematics that yields the truth, not some subjective, intuitive experience.
Gtown71 wrote:
It amazes me how people can open their mind into believing some of the wildest things...
Like rising from the dead, walking on water, turning water into wine? I agree. It amazes me how people can believe such wild things.

At least with evolution, we have compelling, physical evidence across multiple, scientific disciplines all converging on the same conclusion. No theory in the history of science has been so thoroughly tested and withstood so many attacks by the unenlightened. You really should make an attempt to understand the science better rather than making lazy assumptions.
former res

Broomall, PA

#47047 Jan 15, 2013
Frijoles wrote:
<quoted text>
...This forum is like a swingers party. Instead of sex, we have "intellectual" exchanges. Single partners, multiple partners, even if you dont like your partner you are likely back for more after other experiences.
Hows that for unflattering imagery?
I like it!

Instead of swapping bodily fluids, we swap our invaluable opinions and pithy comments.

Good stuff!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#47049 Jan 15, 2013
idgaf wrote:
I see truth and understanding of stories and philosophies that people have individually. I fail to see connections with God. I fail to see that although you are all very knowledgable about the early languages that one of you can make the connections with God. I do see a lot of knowledge or perceived knowledge.
I reiterate, why did God not reveal Himself to the American Indians (America being the new world)? There were also many others who didn't get the memo. Why? Why theJews? Why the Arabs? Why the Romans?
The most likely explanation is that god did not reveal himself to them because he does not exist. They are just made up stories. Every culture/society has their own stories. Some stories tend to stick around, most likely because they served some useful purpose for a period of time. Many others die out as they outlived their usefulness.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#47050 Jan 15, 2013
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
I like it!
Instead of swapping bodily fluids, we swap our invaluable opinions and pithy comments.
Good stuff!
I feel like I need a shower.

““You must not lose faith ”

Since: Jun 11

Location hidden

#47055 Jan 15, 2013
former res wrote:
<quoted text>
I like it!
Instead of swapping bodily fluids, we swap our invaluable opinions and pithy comments.
Good stuff!
Like that episode of Fairly Legal were the guys ask why that judge keeps asking them back, and even at home, and get the reply that is is indeed sex on an intellectual level.
"She get's of on your minds."

The judge in question had been married to a real goodlooking stud.
So needed some different stimulation.

I can dig that, but the bit on needing a mental shower too. lol
former res

Broomall, PA

#47068 Jan 15, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
I feel like I need a shower.
Certain opinions and/or comments will have that effect!

Mr. Trump (among others) comes to mind...
HughBe

Kingston, Jamaica

#47069 Jan 15, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
The $30 is accounted for. The hotel got $25, the clerk takes $2, and the men get a $3 refund.
25+2+3 =30
If your point of this story is to show your inability to reason through a logic problem, you've succeeded ;-).
The points in my prior post stand.
GTown 71----Now, instead of each man being out 10 dollars each for the room, they are only out 9 dollars each.

Yet 9 times 3 = 27 + the 2 dollars the clerk stoled only comes to 29, so what happened to the other dollar?

Culti---The $30 is accounted for. The hotel got $25, the clerk takes $2, and the men get a $3 refund.
25+2+3 =30

HughBe--- My dear Culti, you have ACCOUNTED for the $30 but have NOT answered the question i.e. what happened to the other dollar?

The answer is NOTHING. It is in the $27. The addition of the two dollars to the $27 is double counting and so wrong.

Actual cost to the men $27 (25+2)
Refund 3
Original funds $30

The "9 times 3 = 27 + the 2 dollars the clerk stoled" is just a magic trick. If the refund was added you would get $32 or more money than the original $30 given, see below. Also, the $27(9 times 3) dollars ALREADY contains the stolen $2 and so to add another stolen $2 is double counting and foolish.

$27(9*3)+$2(stolen)+3(refund)= $32
former res

Broomall, PA

#47071 Jan 15, 2013
Huggybear

Do you enjoy Blue Mountain Coffee?

Do you say "Mon" at the end of each sentence?

Just curious.

Have you shined yourself today?

Admired yourself in the mirror?

Missed me?

Happy New Year, if it's not too late..
Voluntarist

United States

#47072 Jan 15, 2013
Texas Congressman Threatens Obama With
Impeachment If He Uses Exec. Orders on Guns
Adan Salazar
Infowars.com
January 15, 2013
A Texas Congressman is threatening president Obama with
impeachment if his administration exercises executive action to scale
back the Second Amendment.
In a press release titled,“Obama’s gun grab
an unconstitutional threat to the nation,”
republican Rep. Steve Stockman stated,“The
White House’s recent announcement they
will use executive orders and executive
actions to infringe on our constitutionally-
protected right to keep and bear arms is an
unconstitutional and unconscionable attack
on the very founding principles of this
republic.”
Rep. Stockman said that he will pursue “any
means necessary” to thwart Obama’s use of
executive orders targeting the Second
Amendment “including but not limited to eliminating funding for
implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles
of impeachment.”
“Under no circumstances whatsoever may the government take any
action that disarms any peaceable person – much less without due
process through an executive declaration without a vote of Congress
or a ruling of a court,” Rep. Stockman stated.
The Congressman said that the president’s actions would represent
“not just an attack on the Constitution” but “a direct attack on
Americans that place all of us in danger.”
“If the President is allowed to suspend constitutional rights on his own
personal whims, our free republic has effectively ceased to exist.”
Congressman Stockman’s strong defense of the Second Amendment
comes at a crucial time in the gun control debate. Anti-gun
proponents have been envigored by the recent tragic events in
Newtown, CT and are seeking to capitalize on the nation’s emotional
vulnerability during this opportune moment to pass sweeping gun
reform.
However, there are some law enforcers at local levels that say they
will not enforce any unconstitutional mandates declared by the federal
government. Sheriff Denny Peyman of Jackson County, Kentucky
during a town hall speech this past Saturday, told attendees that he
had no intention of taking anybody’s guns away .“I am responsible for
the people inside this county,” stated Peyman, adding,“I couldn’t
justify, if Obama passes this, it doesn’t matter what he passes, the
sheriff has more power than the federal people.”
“I consider this a moral obligation… My office will not comply with
any federal actions which violate the United States Constitution or the
Kentucky Constitution which I swore to uphold,” Peyman declared.

http://www.infowars.com/texas-congressman-thr...
former res

Broomall, PA

#47074 Jan 15, 2013
No shortage of fringe lunatics.
Gtown71

United States

#47076 Jan 15, 2013
Cult of Reason wrote:
<quoted text>
If anything, your story reinforces my point, not yours. Your story was a riddle designed to confuse the reader. In attempting to analyze the riddle, people tend to go with their initial instincts (much like they do with religion or try to explain something they don't understand). It's lazy thinking that leads to incorrect assumptions. In the end, though, I have shown that it is logic and a proper understanding of mathematics that yields the truth, not some subjective, intuitive experience.
<quoted text>
Like rising from the dead, walking on water, turning water into wine? I agree. It amazes me how people can believe such wild things.
At least with evolution, we have compelling, physical evidence across multiple, scientific disciplines all converging on the same conclusion. No theory in the history of science has been so thoroughly tested and withstood so many attacks by the unenlightened. You really should make an attempt to understand the science better rather than making lazy assumptions.
So you're saying that people have seen people evolve from rocks?
plus it don't take a rocket scientist to live life.
Maybe my example was poor, and I don't study alot of science. What I know about science, is that it is wonderful, but true science and God can and does walk hand in hand.
Millions of years ago, or far far away this or that happened, is no different then saying many years ago a man walked on water.

I've never been able to explain what happened to me, and for sure I didn't evolve.

The same goes for many other true believers in God.
Their lives were completely changed by God.

You are no different then anyone else, who tries to not believe in a God.
You know if there is a God, then you may be held accountable for your sin.

To those who don't believe, there is no amount of evidence that will be enough. To those of us who do believe, no amount of evidence is needed.

God put in every man the need to worship, this is why every man worships something. Most worship themselves, just like I did for years.

All I know for sure, is what happened to me that night. It was clear who woke me up, and who changed my core values "things that are never changed in a person, was changed in me.

Plus I desired greatly to read a bible, and did for hours and hours, days, weeks, now years. Before I would have rather chewed off my own foot, then read 1 verse.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Earl 1,457,908
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 39 min jock itch lol 230,972
last post wins! (Dec '10) 7 hr They cannot kill ... 2,751
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 hr Moans6157 62,300
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 9 hr honeymylove 2,273
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 10 hr Doug77 9,840
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr Go Blue Forever 104,505

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages