Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel

[rabbee yehoshooah adam]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess it doesn't take much to get a degree in "electronics engineering" where he comes from. Do they have Devry or other such trade schools in the middle east?

rabbee: oh, yes devry, formerly known as the national radio institute.

and are they are limited to, how to pack a suicide vest school of technology? with tech courses in, how to load and reload an ak 47.

how to dawn a gas mask, you don't have in 9 seconds or less. and inject yourself with, an automatic syringe. that you have absolutly, no idea what's in it. what the heck is, atropine sulphate anyway? bella-done a what?

[hillbillyboy]

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

<quoted text>
The invisible sky daddy doesn't exist and creation from nothing is a myth.
Yes, you're IGNORANT since you know nothing about the fundamentals of nature and being beginning with their origins from a unified source and all that you know by way of a few crude inferences is something so superficial that it does not count and gives a misleading picture of the reality.
You and your filthy family are heading for destruction and death within a couple of years.
(smiles)

..."And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved"...

Mark 13:13

[Cult of Reason]

rabbee yehoshooah adam wrote:

<quoted text>
rabbee: oh, yes devry, formerly known as the national radio institute.
and are they are limited to, how to pack a suicide vest school of technology? with tech courses in, how to load and reload an ak 47.
how to dawn a gas mask, you don't have in 9 seconds or less. and inject yourself with, an automatic syringe. that you have absolutly, no idea what's in it. what the heck is, atropine sulphate anyway? bella-done a what?

And don't forget the extra credit project: how to rig an IED with a cell phone trigger.

[hillbillyboy]

Modern science is catching up to the 19th century assumptions of evolution and debunking them.

So also are the wrong assumptions of the Big Bang Theory. 21st century science is doing a great job of debunking them both.

A little video of explanation and edification...

Our Solar System, Evidence of Creation - Spike Psarris - YouTube

&#9658; 88:05&#9658; 88:05

www.youtube.com/watch...

So there we see a scientist revealing how the BBT is debunked beyond any reasonable doubt. 21st century science has proven it so, and debunked the BBT.

[Eric]

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

70% homosexual + 30% heterosexual. LOL.

There is that Gay Anxiety Syndrome (GAS) again.

[former res]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
Must be those fuzzy glasses Frijoles posted about yesterday. Clearly, we're the blind ones for not seeing the invisible sky daddy.

Probably owing to our lack of imagination.

My mother never read to me when I was a child.

[Cult of Reason]

hillbillyboy wrote:

Modern science is catching up to the 19th century assumptions of evolution and debunking them.
So also are the wrong assumptions of the Big Bang Theory. 21st century science is doing a great job of debunking them both.
A little video of explanation and edification...
Our Solar System, Evidence of Creation - Spike Psarris - YouTube
&#9658; 88:05&#9658; 88:05
www.youtube.com/watch...
So there we see a scientist revealing how the BBT is debunked beyond any reasonable doubt. 21st century science has proven it so, and debunked the BBT.

Nice try...

http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/05/23/how-...

[Frijoles]

former res wrote:

<quoted text>
Probably owing to our lack of imagination.
My mother never read to me when I was a child.

and look how you turned out!

if anything that may be an argument of nature over nurture.

[Frijoles]

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

WAS OBAMA WAS MARRIED TO A PAKISTANI MAN?
Barack Obama, the president of the United States of America, was previously married to a gay Pakistani man.

Yoda - you are soooo obsessed. Just come out. Its the ONLY way forward.

(I am sure somewhere out there is a support group for gay yogis)

[Frijoles]

JOEL PASTAKIA wrote:

SCIENCE - NO WHERE NEAR SOLVING THE QUESTION OF THE ORIGINS:
Another problem is this:
Does any version of the Big Bang theory, including the inflationary model, really predict the observed universe?
What is finally got out of this complicated initial state is a universe about 4 inches across, filled with nothing more than a uniform superdense, superheated gas.
This will expand and cool, but there is no reason to suppose that it will ever become more than a cloud of uniformly distributed gas.
In fact, this is all that any of the Big Bang theories leave you with.
So, if present theory requires implausible tinkering simply to yield a universe consisting of uniformly distributed gas, then we can just imagine what would be necessary to get it to yield the complex universe as we know it today ! LOL.
In a good scientific explanation many complex phenomena can be deduced from a simple theoretical scheme, but in the inflationary model of the universe - and indeed in the standard Big Bang theories - we have just the opposite:
From a very complex tangle of equations, we just get an expanding uniform ball of gas.
Despite this, science magazines run articles about the inflationary model, complete with pages of high tech illustrations, that give the impression that physics has finally achieved the ultimate goal - explaining the origin of the universe.
Not quite, it seems.
In fact, no where near it.
BIG BANG OR BIG HOAX?
(smiles)

Argument from ignorance- logical fallacy

havent you been paying attention?

[Frijoles]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess it doesn't take much to get a degree in "electronics engineering" where he comes from. Do they have Devry or other such trade schools in the middle east?

He is from India. So you cant even blame it on the lack of Arab intellectuality.

A while ago on the other thread he accidentally revealed his name and job. His job had something to do with engineering/water resources, but given his limited ability to think independantly or employ critical thinking, I doubt his job requires major responsibility. At one point we veared into a discussion of the hydrology of a Muslim sacred spring, and it was obvious he didnt know anything elementary about that subject either.

[Cult of Reason]

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
He is from India. So you cant even blame it on the lack of Arab intellectuality.
A while ago on the other thread he accidentally revealed his name and job. His job had something to do with engineering/water resources, but given his limited ability to think independantly or employ critical thinking, I doubt his job requires major responsibility. At one point we veared into a discussion of the hydrology of a Muslim sacred spring, and it was obvious he didnt know anything elementary about that subject either.

Guess he couldn't make it into India's Institutes of Technology (IIT). Oh well, I guess that's why the trade schools exist.

[hillbillyboy]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice try...
http://worldofweirdthings.com/2009/05/23/how-...

Ah yes, the old "An object crashed into it" explanation that evolutionist give to explain the BBT fails in the solar system. Such is common on atheist websites.

Just about every BBT fail is explained this way by evolutionist(though with no scientific evidence to support it)

For those who dont know what we are taling about, go back to post 39564 of this thread and take in the video. Its from a scientist who exlains in very careful an scientific language, how the BBT is a total fail, from scientific evidence.

[Frijoles]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
Guess he couldn't make it into India's Institutes of Technology (IIT). Oh well, I guess that's why the trade schools exist.

OTOH I wouldnt be impressed even if he graduated from IIT. Yoda tutors those students (or those similar). Can you imagine?

[rabbee yehoshooah adam]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text> And don't forget the extra credit project: how to rig an IED with a cell phone trigger.

rabbee: oh hell i can do it cheaper than that, without a cell phone. there was not anything as a child prodogy, there was no problem i could not solve with the proper application of homemade high or low explosives. even set, booby traps for flies. and many times have indirectly been accused, as a ufo, marsh gas or sonic boom. and i knew, i was not marsh gas either.

[Frijoles]

hillbillyboy wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes, the old "An object crashed into it" explanation that evolutionist give to explain the BBT fails in the solar system. Such is common on atheist websites.
Just about every BBT fail is explained this way by evolutionist(though with no scientific evidence to support it)
For those who dont know what we are taling about, go back to post 39564 of this thread and take in the video. Its from a scientist who exlains in very careful an scientific language, how the BBT is a total fail, from scientific evidence.

Thats ok. Tennessee (and Kentucky) are often viewed by many here as existential proof for the theory of alien landings....

[rabbee yehoshooah adam]

Cult of Reason wrote:

<quoted text>
Guess he couldn't make it into India's Institutes of Technology (IIT). Oh well, I guess that's why the trade schools exist.

rabbee: is union carbide, in india still hiring? but if you want to become an expert injunear, you have to go to a reservation in america.

[Cult of Reason]

hillbillyboy wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes, the old "An object crashed into it" explanation that evolutionist give to explain the BBT fails in the solar system. Such is common on atheist websites.
Just about every BBT fail is explained this way by evolutionist(though with no scientific evidence to support it)
For those who dont know what we are taling about, go back to post 39564 of this thread and take in the video. Its from a scientist who exlains in very careful an scientific language, how the BBT is a total fail, from scientific evidence.

Just the fact that you use the term evolutionist when talking about planetary formation and BBT speaks volumes of you and your fellow illiterati.

So we have one pseudo-scientist/creationist versus all mainstream astronomers with evidence-backed theories. Hmmmm,, who/what to believe? The magic sky daddy theory or science. The choice is clear.

[Cult of Reason]

Frijoles wrote:

<quoted text>
Thats ok. Tennessee (and Kentucky) are often viewed by many here as existential proof for the theory of alien landings....

And also a fine case study on the results of inbreeding.

[rabbee yehoshooah adam]

hillbillyboy wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes, the old "An object crashed into it" explanation that evolutionist give to explain the BBT fails in the solar system. Such is common on atheist websites.
Just about every BBT fail is explained this way by evolutionist(though with no scientific evidence to support it)
For those who dont know what we are taling about, go back to post 39564 of this thread and take in the video. Its from a scientist who exlains in very careful an scientific language, how the BBT is a total fail, from scientific evidence.

rabbee: basil body temperature??? or was my premed school, a total waste here? man i hate it when people us anacronyms, without n initial qualifier.

if you have no observer, or cannot duplicate it. then why bother propagandize, it? you don't really know nor is there any way to prove, exactly how the universe is formed. it is all conjecture, as far as i am concerned.

the universe is not chaotic, we are chaotic in our helter skelter approach to it. don't worry about it, it will change again. just like all the other theories, of the formation of the universe. none of this crap, will make life better on earth.