The only one having a hissy fit is you git.<quoted text>
Calm down, you are having another hissy fit!
No, those aren't my words at all, nor is that statement anything that has beeen presented as "according to the gays". But given that lies are all you have Greg, no one is surprised to see you post yet another. No one mentioned anything at all about what a "factor" children would be. YOU, went on a fundi-bender about "procreation between a same sex couple" as if that had some type of importance. "Procreation between a couple" is not the same as "factoring children" before and after marriage. But you keep spinning Greg. Dance like the lying puppet you are.<quoted text>
By your own words.
According to gays, children are a factor after the affect, but not before? A little late dont you think?
Oh, and I notice you cowardly avoided responding to one of the few questions actually asked of you. Here, let's try it again sniveling princess....
In what state has the argument of "ability to mutually procreate" been determined to be a valid state interest in denying a couple the right to marry? SMIRK. Don't let the answer stop you from continuing to try and present it as important.