Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

Nov 30, 2010 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: CBS2

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Comments
47,521 - 47,540 of 49,265 Comments Last updated 2 hrs ago

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54779
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

5

KiMare wrote:
I don't think there is a rational argument for ss marriage.
1. In this particular issue, it is interesting that every major religion disagrees with ss marriage. The Judeo/Christian position is that it is 'against nature'. In other words, mating behavior is mean't to be between opposite sexes. In terms of design and function that is not in conflict with medical or evolutionary science. The First Amendment encouraged the free exercise of faith, and was in fact fundamental in shaping our Constitution.
2. Marriage has been present in every culture in 8,000 years of human history. While quasi ss marriages have rarely and very briefly appeared, they have never established themselves and spread.
3. Social scientists assert that marriage would not exist were it not for procreation. In fact, with no-fault divorce ignoring the consequences on children, and abortion removing consideration of children, we have seen a dramatic and drastic decline in marriage and it's permanence.
It seems silly to expect a 'requirement' for procreation when most marriages require protection not to procreate. Additionally, until recently, the ability to determine the potential for conception could not be predetermined before marriage.
The fact of the matter is, normally the best place to raise a child is with their mother and father. And in fact, most parents and children prefer that.
4. I think you sell 'icky' short. It usually refers to anal sex (ie your note on Lawrence vs Texas). Medical science notes the inherent harm of anal sex. Most people view confusing a septic system for a playground as unhealthy, and even in the animal kingdom, ss anal sex is used as a means of domination.
5. At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron.
6. Words describe reality. The fruitful union of a diverse gender couple in marriage is distinctly different from the mutual barrenness of a duplicate gender couple. And those are just two of many distinctions between the two relationships. It would be deceptive to label them equal, and in fact, sets up an inferior comparison.
So many words to say absolutely nothing.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54780
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

CDC wrote:
Please provide the posting number and I will gladly retract my statement. I do not recall seeing him post the blog. I DO recall others.
If I am wrong I WILL apologize.
<quoted text>
You seem to be under the misimpression that we are here to do your research. We aren't. It's been years since Greg first revealed himself by posting directly from his idiotic blog site. No one here is going to go scrounging back through years of Greg's posts for you.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54781
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where have I judged in God's name?
I note two scientific facts:
1. At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior, making ss marriage an oxymoron.
2. Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning making homosexuality a sexual defect.
No Bible, only facts.
Smile.
Those aren't scientific facts. If they were, you could support them with scientific research. Good luck with that gramps. You haven't been able to support your repetition scientifically since you began your little one man impotent crusade!

Demonstrating what a pathetic lying cur you are is always fun Greg. Thanks for the always making it so easy to do so.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54782
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Its a fact that your marrage is an inferior mutually sterile pointlessly duplicate gender half of marriage.
Smile.
No, that ISN'T a fact, that's merely your prejudiced opinion, which is as worthless and impotent as your blogsite and your daily efforts on Topix! Keep dancing puppet, you have my permission.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54783
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You never go to bed because you are alone. Rejected over and over.
Why? Because you were a troll before you got on Topix.
Ugly inside and out.
Oh, look at Kuntmare, intentionally trying to sow discord. What does you little buybull say your Hebrew god thinks about people that intentionally sow discord Greg?

Burn in hell puppet!!

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54784
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Ace wrote:
<quoted text>"inferior".. .. Correct! Until same sex couples can reproduce human life without the opposite sex, same sex marriage will always be inferior!
Mans laws will never change that. It will always take one man and one women, for human fertilization to create life.
Adam can poke Steve in the butt all he wants, and the best case Scenario will be creating Constipation, not human life. That is Inferior!
Well, look who's back talking about butt sex again. Shocker.

Just for the record moron, marriages that don't produce children aren't magically superior to those that don't. They are completely equal in the eyes of the laws of the states that sanction them. And doesn't that just piss you off!!!!

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54785
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>...
Anal sex, on the other hand, is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning.
We spend literally billions of tax dollars trying to educate and provide the devices need to make anal sex reasonably safe. Foolish and futile.
What devices? Where are these devices? Is there a government program to get these devices? Why is it I'm just now hearing about devices that make anal sex even better?

Can Oprah help be get the devices I might be qualified for?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54786
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Its a fact that your marrage is an inferior
Smile.
That our marriage is inferior is a matter of opinion, not a matter of fact.

The quality of a union is not based on the union's ability to squeeze out a litter of pups. Single women have been popping out babies for years.
wtf

Woodbridge, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54787
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Holy shit this post is still going? You people need to get a life. Why do you worry about other people? I get tired of hearing bible this bible that. If you want to base a law on religion then church's need to pay taxes. For Christ sake call it a civil union as long as they get the same rights who cares

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54788
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where have I judged in God's name?
I note two scientific facts:
1. At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior, making ss marriage an oxymoron.
2. Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning making homosexuality a sexual defect.
No Bible, only facts.
Smile.
Move On wrote:
<quoted text>
Cite your sources for these facts...or
show the results from the study you did proving these facts...
if you can't do either then I'm sorry but you are just expressing your opinion...thats how that works.
I'm confused on why you actually put so much effort into this discussion...you really have no reason to post...you're not open to new ideas, you don't listen to anyone's views with an open mind, and now all you do is trade insults back and forth...you are caught in this wash/rinse repeat cycle...why the hell are still posting on here? No life?
Notice that not ONE response to my post acknowledged the lie that I based my position on the Bible.

All of you just moved from one lie to another. I've posted validation of both facts. Facts that teens know. Which only proves that your gay denial has made you dumber than an eight grader!

1. http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmit...

The first two sentences, "Mating is a human universal. All known societies have formal marriage alliances between men and woman."

2. http://www.webmd.com/sex/anal-sex-health-conc...

"Is Anal Sex Safe?

There are a number of health risks with anal sex, and anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons, including the following:"

Those two facts make ss marriage an oxymoron, literally marrage because of the desecration it seeks to create by denying reality.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54789
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

5

5

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

There are a number of health risks with anal sex, and anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons, including the following:"
Aside from masturbation, which sexual activities are 100% risk free?
If you want to be technical about it, ALL sexual activity is inherently unhealthy.

Pick and choose, you trampy, trailer-trash, tranny trucker troll.
lol

Elburn, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54790
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

7

6

6

Ace wrote:
<quoted text>"inferior".. .. Correct! Until same sex couples can reproduce human life without the opposite sex, same sex marriage will always be inferior!
Mans laws will never change that. It will always take one man and one women, for human fertilization to create life.
Adam can poke Steve in the butt all he wants, and the best case Scenario will be creating Constipation, not human life. That is Inferior!
ohhh I'm sorry there ace I thought this thread was about ssm and unions, I didn't realize it was about rather or not 2 men butt f@$&ing could shoot a baby out their rectum. Ya see, I agree with you there, I dont ever see that happening. Thankfully bearing children doesn't have anything to do with the legality of straight marriage, ssm or unions.
No Big Deal

Dublin, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54791
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

5

5

Scott wrote:
<quoted text>
Great post except you forgot about
A.I.D.S
Anally
Inflicted
Death
Sentence

Of course you're talking about the millions of straight men women and children with this dreaded disease right ? I mean those numbers are far greater Oh Scotty who believes the world is only 6 thousand years old ! Tell us all,when did you lose your logic bone ? LoL
Melissa

Douglasville, GA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54792
May 7, 2014
 

Judged:

6

5

5

As they say " So goes the family, so goes the country".
Just another reason to leave Illinois.
No Big Deal

Dublin, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54793
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Ace wrote:
<quoted text>"inferior".. .. Correct! Until same sex couples can reproduce human life without the opposite sex, same sex marriage will always be inferior!
Mans laws will never change that. It will always take one man and one women, for human fertilization to create life.
Adam can poke Steve in the butt all he wants, and the best case Scenario will be creating Constipation, not human life. That is Inferior!
Well Jesus H. Titty F-ing Christ,I wasn't aware that they passed a law stating that in order to marry you must procreate ! Who knew ? Better round up and arrest all those couples who aren't procreating then immediately ! Idiot ! D-U-H !

“"Not all who wander are lost."”

Since: Mar 10

freshroast666@gmail.com

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54794
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Where have I judged in God's name?
I note two scientific facts:
1. At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior, making ss marriage an oxymoron.
2. Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning making homosexuality a sexual defect.
No Bible, only facts.
Smile.
<quoted text>
Notice that not ONE response to my post acknowledged the lie that I based my position on the Bible.
All of you just moved from one lie to another. I've posted validation of both facts. Facts that teens know. Which only proves that your gay denial has made you dumber than an eight grader!
1. http://www.psy.cmu.edu/~rakison/bussandschmit...
The first two sentences, "Mating is a human universal. All known societies have formal marriage alliances between men and woman."
2. http://www.webmd.com/sex/anal-sex-health-conc...
"Is Anal Sex Safe?
There are a number of health risks with anal sex, and anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons, including the following:"
Those two facts make ss marriage an oxymoron, literally marrage because of the desecration it seeks to create by denying reality.
Finally, something that was actually published, albeit twenty-one years ago by Carnegie Mellon University. The text was copyrighted by the American Psychological Association in 1993 and is now useful primarily to line the bottoms of bird cages. As an aside, Greg, what were you doing in 1993? Interestingly, the same American Psychological Association has published things far more recently stating that the notion that homosexuality is a mental disorder was long ago abandoned by the scientific community. http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.as... . As for your second cited reference, what if I told you that anal sex does not equate to same-sex marriage, although this topic does seem to fascinate you, for some reason? What if I told you that not all male same-sex couples engage in anal sex? Would that disappointment you, Greg? But even if some male same-sex couples do choose to engage in such activity, how does it affect you or anyone else outside that particular relationship? And you never, ever address female same-sex relationships, which are as prevalent as their male counterparts. Are they less offensive to you because anal sex is, for all intents and purposes, impossible for them? Why the fixation on anal sex, Greg? Is that what you suppose a same-sex relationship is? Is that all you suppose it must amount to? You're really a pathetic little man, Greg, with a checkered past and a dim future. How exactly does one make the transition from pastor to truck driver over the years? That seems like quite a departure. Don't the vast majority of pastors remain pastors? I know what we need! We need back-story! Yes we do!

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54795
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

3

3

3

Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Aside from masturbation, which sexual activities are 100% risk free?
If you want to be technical about it, ALL sexual activity is inherently unhealthy.
Pick and choose, you trampy, trailer-trash, tranny trucker troll.
Talk about picking and choosing, I'm not the one who denies this:

"anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons"

http://www.webmd.com/sex/anal-sex-health-conc...

Or, your attempt to equate playing in shit with sexual fondling.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54796
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

8

8

8

MirthMenace wrote:
<quoted text>Finally, something that was actually published, albeit twenty-one years ago by Carnegie Mellon University. The text was copyrighted by the American Psychological Association in 1993 and is now useful primarily to line the bottoms of bird cages. As an aside, Greg, what were you doing in 1993? Interestingly, the same American Psychological Association has published things far more recently stating that the notion that homosexuality is a mental disorder was long ago abandoned by the scientific community. http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.as... . As for your second cited reference, what if I told you that anal sex does not equate to same-sex marriage, although this topic does seem to fascinate you, for some reason? What if I told you that not all male same-sex couples engage in anal sex? Would that disappointment you, Greg? But even if some male same-sex couples do choose to engage in such activity, how does it affect you or anyone else outside that particular relationship? And you never, ever address female same-sex relationships, which are as prevalent as their male counterparts. Are they less offensive to you because anal sex is, for all intents and purposes, impossible for them? Why the fixation on anal sex, Greg? Is that what you suppose a same-sex relationship is? Is that all you suppose it must amount to? You're really a pathetic little man, Greg, with a checkered past and a dim future. How exactly does one make the transition from pastor to truck driver over the years? That seems like quite a departure. Don't the vast majority of pastors remain pastors? I know what we need! We need back-story! Yes we do!
Well, Dick, I specifically quoted the premise that social/evolutionary scientists hold about mating behavior and marriage. That paragraph was not a theory, it is accepted truth, Dick.

Second, Dick, I didn't assert that all homosexuals engage in anal sex. In fact, Dick, I didn't exempt any orientation. I simply used a primary expression of gay sex that equates to natural sex, and noted that it requires the violation of purpose and function requiring the intervention of condoms, enemas and lub to even begin to be safe.

So Dick, all of this still leaves ss marrage as inferior to the union of both genders that normally result in fruit. Sorry Dick.

As to your reversion to gay troll ad homoan attacks, I retired after thirty years in ministry. Twenty at the last Church I pastored, an accomplishment very few pastors achieve. Does that answer your slanderous insinuation Dick?.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54797
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

7

7

6

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Talk about picking and choosing, I'm not the one who denies this:
"anal intercourse is the riskiest form of sexual activity for several reasons"
http://www.webmd.com/sex/anal-sex-health-conc...
Or, your attempt to equate playing in shit with sexual fondling.
Which sexual activity is 100% risk free? Is it oral? Vaginal?

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54798
May 8, 2014
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Melissa wrote:
As they say " So goes the family, so goes the country".
Just another reason to leave Illinois.
Then you better move to an African country. B/c SSM is taking one state at a time. Goodbye.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Ray Donovan 1,096,112
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Whiny1 4,640
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr LRS 176,797
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr andet1987 4,633
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 2 hr andet1987 557
Abby 8-15 2 hr Kuuipo 19
Ferguson police shoot another black unarmed man! 2 hr Hoodies Skittles ... 24
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 7 hr Toj 97,823

Search the Chicago Forum:
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••