Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52083 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54436 Apr 25, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Gay marrage does not require permanence. A marrage contract can have an expiration date, or an easy opt-out clause.
Nor does gay marrage require sexual exclusivity. In fact, it unconstitutionally restricts freedom.
Was that nonsense supposed to be English princess? There's no such entity as gay marriage dear so your post simply demonstrates what a moron you are.

Have a nice day Nancy pants! Time to play fetch yet?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54437 Apr 25, 2014
CDC wrote:
No I am not.
Please refrain from using real names on the forum.
Thanks again for your cooperation in this matter.
<quoted text>
Sod off dolt.
Chicagobunny

Fairview Heights, IL

#54438 Apr 25, 2014
wingless wackadoo and CDC - ya'll from Missoura need to get off of this Illinois thread. We are not pleased with your daily comments meaning absolutely nothing. TY
Sean B

Granite City, IL

#54439 Apr 25, 2014
So much hate. Worry about yourself, let others live as they choose.
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#54440 Apr 25, 2014
Careful now...or you will receive my rage!
Registered Earth Angel wrote:
<quoted text>
Sod off dolt.

Cali Girl 2014

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#54441 Apr 25, 2014
CDC wrote:
<quoted text>No I am not.
Please refrain from using real names on the forum.
Thanks again for your cooperation in this matter.
Oh,I don't plan to sorry.....

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54443 Apr 25, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Gay marrage does not require permanence. A marrage contract can have an expiration date, or an easy opt-out clause.
Nor does gay marrage require sexual exclusivity. In fact, it unconstitutionally restricts freedom.
Put down the crack pipe, Hunty.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54444 Apr 25, 2014
I never mention Kimare's wife by name in any post. I merely talk about his Sandy vagina.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#54445 Apr 25, 2014
Yeah, you bring that up when I talk about your marrage.

Smile.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54446 Apr 25, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Yeah, you bring that up when I talk about your marriage.
Smile.
We're making progress. You now acknowledge my marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#54447 Apr 25, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
We're making progress. You now acknowledge my marrage.
Smirk.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54448 Apr 26, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Smirk.
Your made up words make you feel clever, apparently. They don't, however, represent reality.
Scott

Manhattan, IL

#54449 Apr 26, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Your made up words make you feel clever, apparently. They don't, however, represent reality.
Actually it is you that lives a life of fantasy.
Chicagobunny

Fairview Heights, IL

#54450 Apr 26, 2014
Ya'll needs an INNSBROOK week-end get-out-of-the way. Ya hear.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#54451 Apr 26, 2014
Gay marrage does not require permanence. A marrage contract can have an expiration date, or an easy opt-out clause.

Nor does gay marrage require sexual exclusivity. In fact, it unconstitutionally restricts freedom.

Marriage is for life, because it connects the mother and father to their children.

Marriage is also sexually exclusive so children can be raised by their mother and father.

Ss marrage doesn't require children, therefor it needs neither.

I simply note the historical function of marriage which distinguishes it from marrage and point out the change that occurred with no-fault divorce (children are not considered in divorce), and abortion (children are murdered for convenience). Hence the divorce and childless rate today.

In marrage, children are not required (or possible). However, there are still mothers and fathers committed and monogamous for the sake of their children. Marriage.

Smile.
Be kuel

Marshfield, MO

#54452 Apr 26, 2014
The Monster Mutation KiMare speaks again. What nonsense and what more nonsense will it come up with today!! Kinda fruitie if ya ask me? Don't ask..

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54453 Apr 26, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Gay marrage does not require permanence. A marrage contract can have an expiration date, or an easy opt-out clause.
Nor does gay marrage require sexual exclusivity. In fact, it unconstitutionally restricts freedom.
Marriage is for life, because it connects the mother and father to their children.
Marriage is also sexually exclusive so children can be raised by their mother and father.
Ss marrage doesn't require children, therefor it needs neither.
I simply note the historical function of marriage which distinguishes it from marrage and point out the change that occurred with no-fault divorce (children are not considered in divorce), and abortion (children are murdered for convenience). Hence the divorce and childless rate today.
In marrage, children are not required (or possible). However, there are still mothers and fathers committed and monogamous for the sake of their children. Marriage.
Smile.
So much double speak and large volumes of words to state absolutely nothing.
Yawn.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#54454 Apr 26, 2014
Girls, you understand exactly what it says.

Problem is, you can't argue the logic.

Smirk.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54455 Apr 26, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Girls, you understand exactly what it says.
Which is why it requires no response. Here's one of your "points" I found particularly idiotic.... "In marrage, children are not required (or possible)."

Really? In marriage children are not possible? You're a moron.
KiMare wrote:
Problem is, you can't argue the logic.
Smirk.
No princess, the problem is that you can't present any logic. You never have, you never will. You're a moron gramps.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54458 Apr 26, 2014
KiMare wrote:
Girls, you understand exactly what it says.
Problem is, you can't argue the logic.
Smirk.
More signs of your senility; it only makes sense you.

Secretsmile, Hunty.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Yeah 1,521,667
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 3 min Outlaw-HALAL Foods 12
I think she is pissed. From a few years ago. 6 min SENIORS READ-THIS 5
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 28 min They cannot kill ... 10,574
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Coffee Party 240,324
quality Novelty IDs 3 hr Lasen 1
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 12 hr TRD 71,284

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages