Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52086 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

Ace

Benton, IL

#54075 Apr 12, 2014
Speaking in gods behalf. God give mankind the gift of voice and a brain with instructions so god fearing people could speak in his behalf.

Cali Girl 2014

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#54076 Apr 12, 2014
Ace wrote:
Speaking in gods behalf. God give mankind the gift of voice and a brain with instructions so god fearing people could speak in his behalf.
Judge not,yet thee be judged as well...
Matthew 7:1

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54077 Apr 12, 2014
Ace wrote:
Speaking in gods behalf. God give mankind the gift of voice and a brain with instructions so god fearing people could speak in his behalf.
In my entire 30 years as a UCC employee, I never once heard a colleague, or congregant use the term "God fearing".

I truly feel sorry for you.
Ace

Benton, IL

#54078 Apr 12, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
In my entire 30 years as a UCC employee, I never once heard a colleague, or congregant use the term "God fearing".
I truly feel sorry for you.
god-fearing - definition of god-fearing by the Free Online ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/god-fearing
God-fearing adj 1. pious; devout: a God-fearing people . God&#8242;-fear`ing adj. 1. deeply respectful or fearful of God. 2.( sometimes l.c.) deeply religious; pious ...

Then you should educate yourself before you speak and quit making a fool of yourself.

The term "God fearing people" is common language.
Ace

Benton, IL

#54079 Apr 12, 2014
Cali Girl 2014 wrote:
<quoted text>
Judge not,yet thee be judged as well...
Matthew 7:1
Romans 2:1

Inexcusable means "without any defense" (compare Rom. 1:20). He has nothing to say, he is silenced (compare Romans 3:19); he is guilty and he knows it!

This verse is talking about a person who is passing judgment on another, condemning the actions of another. Hence, it is talking about the moral person (the person with moral discernment, the person who passes a moral judgment on someone). There is a difference between the moral man and the heathen man. In Romans 1:32 the heathen man APPROVES and APPLAUDS sinful conduct but in Romans 2:1 the moral man DISAPPROVES and JUDGES sinful conduct.

Yes moral men has the right to judge good vs evil behavior.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54080 Apr 12, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text>god-fearing - definition of god-fearing by the Free Online ...
www.thefreedictionary.com/god-fearing
God-fearing adj 1. pious; devout: a God-fearing people . God&#8242;-fear`ing adj. 1. deeply respectful or fearful of God. 2.( sometimes l.c.) deeply religious; pious ...
Then you should educate yourself before you speak and quit making a fool of yourself.
The term "God fearing people" is common language.
Or course it is, among "God-fearing" people.

I believe in a God of Grace, not a God to be feared.

Thanks for trying to school me.

Cali Girl 2014

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#54081 Apr 12, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text>Romans 2:1

Inexcusable means "without any defense" (compare Rom. 1:20). He has nothing to say, he is silenced (compare Romans 3:19); he is guilty and he knows it!

This verse is talking about a person who is passing judgment on another, condemning the actions of another. Hence, it is talking about the moral person (the person with moral discernment, the person who passes a moral judgment on someone). There is a difference between the moral man and the heathen man. In Romans 1:32 the heathen man APPROVES and APPLAUDS sinful conduct but in Romans 2:1 the moral man DISAPPROVES and JUDGES sinful conduct.

Yes moral men has the right to judge good vs evil behavior.
Per you......You think your way and I
will think mine... You consider yourself
above others?I don't,we are all human.
Ace

Benton, IL

#54082 Apr 12, 2014
So you disapprove of jury duty? When we go vote we are choosing what candidate is the least of the two evils. Yes we are judging all the time, as i have seen you judge people on this forum. Don't act so innocent lol.
PS judging is not thinking you are better than anyone else. It's a god given way of life, Good morals or heathen? Working or lazy? I'm sure you wouldn't choose a lazy bum to marry.

Cali Girl 2014

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#54083 Apr 12, 2014
Ace wrote:
So you disapprove of jury duty? When we go vote we are choosing what candidate is the least of the two evils. Yes we are judging all the time, as i have seen you judge people on this forum. Don't act so innocent lol.
PS judging is not thinking you are better than anyone else. It's a god given way of life, Good morals or heathen? Working or lazy? I'm sure you wouldn't choose a lazy bum to marry.
No.....Voting is not judging,it's choosing.
Ace

Benton, IL

#54084 Apr 12, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Or course it is, among "God-fearing" people.
I believe in a God of Grace, not a God to be feared.
Thanks for trying to school me.
Dusty said, "in his behalf.
In my entire 30 years as a UCC employee, I never once heard a colleague, or congregant use the term "God fearing".

So why did you lie and act like the phrase "God Fearing" wasn't common language?
MYOB

Beverly, MA

#54085 Apr 13, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text>Romans 2:1
Inexcusable means "without any defense" (compare Rom. 1:20). He has nothing to say, he is silenced (compare Romans 3:19); he is guilty and he knows it!
This verse is talking about a person who is passing judgment on another, condemning the actions of another. Hence, it is talking about the moral person (the person with moral discernment, the person who passes a moral judgment on someone). There is a difference between the moral man and the heathen man. In Romans 1:32 the heathen man APPROVES and APPLAUDS sinful conduct but in Romans 2:1 the moral man DISAPPROVES and JUDGES sinful conduct.
Yes moral men has the right to judge good vs evil behavior.
If you do not want to be a homosexual, you don't have to participate. If you do not want to go to a gay wedding, then don't. Nobody is asking everyone to applaud homosexuals. Just treat people fairly and when it comes to personal lives, mind your own business.

Voting in ways that cause others to endure discrimination is a form of judgement and also passing a sentence.

So stay in your comfort zone and leave others alone. Go to your church and hang out with those who think like you and leave everybody else alone. Sit in your little corner and pass all the judgement you want. Fantasize about all those things with which you so disapprove. It. Seems to give you something to do, just do it at home and keep your discrimination at home.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#54086 Apr 13, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text> Dusty said, "in his behalf.
In my entire 30 years as a UCC employee, I never once heard a colleague, or congregant use the term "God fearing".
So why did you lie and act like the phrase "God Fearing" wasn't common language?
Go back and read the post, Bufford.
jimtownhounddogs niffing

Fairview Heights, IL

#54087 Apr 13, 2014
OMG - don't vote for Durbin. Now back to Illinois house. Don't vote for an incumbent. They are all related.

Cali Girl 2014

Since: Mar 14

Location hidden

#54088 Apr 13, 2014
MYOB wrote:
<quoted text>If you do not want to be a homosexual, you don't have to participate. If you do not want to go to a gay wedding, then don't. Nobody is asking everyone to applaud homosexuals. Just treat people fairly and when it comes to personal lives, mind your own business.

Voting in ways that cause others to endure discrimination is a form of judgement and also passing a sentence.

So stay in your comfort zone and leave others alone. Go to your church and hang out with those who think like you and leave everybody else alone. Sit in your little corner and pass all the judgement you want. Fantasize about all those things with which you so disapprove. It. Seems to give you something to do, just do it at home and keep your discrimination at home.
Very well said.You don't have to like
some things,but you do have to
respect them....
jimtownhounddogs niffing

Fairview Heights, IL

#54089 Apr 13, 2014
Kinda like the Call Girl 2014. She could get thems POLITICIANS in trouble for sure in Springsfield. That would shake up the House fer sure.
Doctor Truth

United States

#54090 Apr 13, 2014
This string should be deleted. Gays can marry each other and that is the law. Who cares?

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54091 Apr 13, 2014
KiMare wrote:
The personal bullying and troll attacks don't answer the question:
Won't same sex couples feel inferior next to diverse gendered couples, especially when the latter have children?
A cultural relationship is defined by specific details. There is significant differences between a diverse gendered couple and a duplicate gendered couple. There is also a profound difference between a relationship that bears fruit, and one that never does.
An example for just part of the question is the difficulty a heterosexual couple unable to bear children experiences.
The question was answered. The answer was "no", because there is no reason to.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/johnston-city...

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54092 Apr 13, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Lol, you have a piece of paper from the state that every element of reality mocks.
No dear, only inferior curmudgeons like your self mock it. Inferior curmudgeons like yourself don't represent every element of reality, you only represent a pitiful handful of the planets lowest denominator of the human species. No one cares about what you mock princess.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Your relationship is a duplicate gendered fruitless fraud.
My relationship is plenty fruitful fruitloops.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Smirk.
I do. Every time you post your stupidity gramps. I smirk knowing that absolutely nothing you say affects gays in any way, shape, or form, and yet you continue to deliriously think your opinions have some sort of value. I smirk everyday at how ultimately pathetic you are Greg.
Ace

Benton, IL

#54093 Apr 13, 2014
Doctor Truth wrote:
This string should be deleted. Gays can marry each other and that is the law. Who cares?
For now, but there is a revolution coming.

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#54094 Apr 13, 2014
Ace wrote:
<quoted text> Now you are talking out of your ass because your mouth knows better. If a gay couple is raising a child at least one of them is not the biological parent!
No? Really? Alert the presses everyone!!!!! I love it when idiots like yourself place huge amounts of importance on things that have no importance whatsoever!!! One person not being the biological parent has no importance to the non-biological parent, the biological parent, or the child. But straight adoptive parents all over the world appreciate you letting them know that your loathing extends to them as well. Seems the number of people you hate grows everyday.
Ace wrote:
Just taking advantage of someone else's fuckings.
Yes, that’s what all adoptive parents are doing. But tell me rocket scientist, who else is supposed to raise all those millions of children you fundies don’t want to be aborted? Oh, that’s right….adoptive parents. Seems you want to have all sorts of children be brought into the world, but then when people step up to raise them, you shit on them by saying they are taking advantage of the very scenario you people peddle! I love when you fundies demonstrate your hypocrisy so well.
Ace wrote:
God will never bless two gays with a biological child.
Really? Shocker!!!!! And this is important why? LOL!! Dolt.
Ace wrote:
Two men will never replace the most special word on earth. "Mom".
And two lesbians will improve on the most special word on earth.“moms”. Now, who exactly dear has declared that “mom” is the most special word on earth? Is it more special than “love”,“compassion”,“health”,“ acceptance” or “fairness”? Who exactly is head over deciding what words are most special?
Ace wrote:
Mom would have a much better successful chance of replacing dad with a women, that dad would have replacing mom with man.
Was that supposed to be English?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min flack 1,498,669
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 min Patriot AKA Bozo 63,409
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 12 min Coffee Party 237,906
The reasons why the liberals lost. 21 min actorvet 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr SweLL GirL 10,378
Norcross and Chertoff behind Russian Hacks 8 hr Norcross leak 1
Jonny's Towing is Chicagoland's Most Crooked Co... 9 hr Well Well 25

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages