Where did you read this. Being that 90% of what you say is lies, you'll need to document your sources, bitch.<quoted text>
I've read the early accounts of descriptions of native American homosexuality. Not a pretty description. Most often a very abusive situation. You might want to forgo the gay sites and read the actual accounts available on the internet.
Greeks did not have ss marriage. Men took boys to war for a convenient sexual release. They then returned to their wives. The boys grew up, and converted to heterosexuality and married women. Are you sure you want to promote that example???
Nor did the Romans ever legalize ss marriage. Nero claimed to have a ss marriage. Twice. He was mocked by his peers.
The rest of your post is similar. Ignorant bigotry and troll behavior at an immature level. How old are you?
Yes, the Greeks did have same sex marriage. So did the Romans. Native American homosexuals were revered as holy men.
Regardless, it's a stupid point to even bring up. It doesn't matter what history has been. For most of history, slavery has been acceptable. Using the same logic that you are applying here, slavery must still be acceptable because there's a historical record of it. That's sheer idiocy.
Not to mention that thorughout most of history, narriage has been polygamous and had nothing to do with one man and one woman. Then there's the nepali cultures that practice polyandry. You are trying to change history so you can make an argument that history is on your side, which isn't even that good of an argument to begin with. Damn you're dumb, boy. But what else can we expect from some hillbilly truck driver?
The only problem here is that you are the only one who gives a shit what you think, my little narcissistic friend. As a defrocked pastor who was kicked out of his church for adultery, you just aren't that important.